← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106350353

47 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.106350353 >>106350382 >>106350452 >>106350770 >>106351678 >>106352612 >>106354381 >>106355832 >>106357528 >>106359589 >>106362665 >>106364874 >>106365405 >>106374076
Why don't webshitters use Dart? Clearly better than JavaScript, not a retarded transpiler, has a working VM, compiles to JS and to binary, has superior features and syntax. Like if you're going to have your retarded build step and JavaScript is not enough for you and you want to larp as le serious developer who uses types, why not choose Dart?
Anonymous No.106350382 >>106350409 >>106352538
>>106350353 (OP)
This thing just compiles to JS. What's the Point
Anonymous No.106350409 >>106352548
>>106350382
Sorry, I meant to say "Clearly better than TypeScript". In general I agree with you you're better off just using JavaScript, but between Dart and TypeScript I don't understand how TypeScript can be more attractive.
Anonymous No.106350452 >>106350484 >>106351334
>>106350353 (OP)
superseded by javascript improvements + typescript.
never got merged into Chrome like planned
langauge is just a not-needed meme that will probably float around endlessly because like 10+ customers inside Google still use it and have no budget to remove it. Same shit with stuff like GWT, which STILL exists despite how totally dogshit it is.
Anonymous No.106350484 >>106350535
>>106350452
Except Dart is better than TypeScript, which is dogshit. But Dart isn't, it's pretty great.
Anonymous No.106350535 >>106367676
>>106350484
and? usecase for some nonfree nih google shitlang with most its killer features being merged into js?
>b-but it's foss
kek. this is like kotlin, powershell, etc where you download some blobs just to build it. it's like that schizo who said rust was nonfree because he claimed it couldn't be bootstrapped (it can be btw).
Anonymous No.106350770
>>106350353 (OP)
is't that a google product? they are a fucking meme company wrt dropping products at a whim
Anonymous No.106350786 >>106352000 >>106352116
For me it's ClojureDart™
https://github.com/Tensegritics/ClojureDart
Anonymous No.106351334
>>106350452
>superseded by javascript improvements + typescript
lolno
Anonymous No.106351678
>>106350353 (OP)
>Why don't webshitters use Dart?
Because there's lots of coders who know JS and next to nobody knows Dart, so hiring one is easy and hiring the other is impossible.
Nobody gives a shit what NEETs use, so there's hope for you.
Anonymous No.106352000
>>106350786
based clojurechad
Anonymous No.106352116
>>106350786
Is thia goos to build desktop apps? I want to build my own planner.
Anonymous No.106352302 >>106352538
Is fluttee webshit,
Anonymous No.106352538
>>106350382
compiles to wasm now, it's much better >>106352302
flutter is the optimal shitposting lang for every project
Anonymous No.106352548
>>106350409
TS is compatible with JS. Also, how is dart better than TS? I don't think dart even has union types. TS type system is very powerful and you can go from JS to strict TS with one config. This allows TS to be just another build step in the process, instead of a complete stranger separate from web technology.
Anonymous No.106352612
>>106350353 (OP)
Get the fuck off 4chan Brendan. Dart is for retarded Googlers.
Anonymous No.106352616
This shit wouldn't happen if we listened to Alan Kay.
Anonymous No.106354381
>>106350353 (OP)
>Java but just with some weird syntax
why would I use this instead of plain java
Anonymous No.106354864 >>106369323
When you compile to js it is much slower than natively written js, especially if you have a lot of ui elements on one page.

Why don't you use tauri for your apps together with a js framework of your choice (I use svelte)


Also ChatGPT writes HTML and js fluently and HTML also supports svg and it can put interactivity inside it so I can design everything that ai cannot do yet in svg like complex ui elements.

A tauri desktop app is 600kb because it is like electron but it uses the systems browser. You can also export it for mobile
Anonymous No.106355832 >>106358776 >>106359858
>>106350353 (OP)
Typescript tooling mogs Dart everything
What’s been written in Dart other than Sass?
Anonymous No.106357528
>>106350353 (OP)
Can it compile to anything low level and high performance?
Anonymous No.106358776
>>106355832
>Typescript
more like typecope
Anonymous No.106359589
>>106350353 (OP)
Blame "Project Ravager" google for it. Its a miracle its even alive nowadays. Same as Go, i use both because is convenient for multiplatform stuff and i hate js. But i cant blame people if they think is too risky for a long term project.
Anonymous No.106359858
>>106355832
>use a shitty, substandard wrapper for JavaScript
>to develop a shitty, substandard wrapper for CSS
The sass tranny should start replacing all of the documentation with pigdin, it'd be on brand
Anonymous No.106360060 >>106362373
the company i got laid off from used flutter, so now i hope to god google deprecates it. fuck em
Anonymous No.106362373
>>106360060
top kek
Anonymous No.106362665 >>106364797 >>106365284
>>106350353 (OP)
There's literally nothing wrong with javascript. It's a perfectly elegant language once you understand that it's supposed to work with an event loop and without throwing errors in someone's browser
Anonymous No.106364797
>>106362665
>There's literally nothing wrong with javascript
lol
Anonymous No.106364812
I'm trying to move away from OOP in Loo, functional react and immer got there to a digree, i don't want to code like im in a pajeet sweatshop again
Anonymous No.106364874 >>106366422
>>106350353 (OP)
Dart? More like Fart. More like Shart.
Anonymous No.106365284
>>106362665
kys
Anonymous No.106365382 >>106367431
For cross platform you either use QT or react native.
Nobody is going to risk google just dropping flutter support and learning new language for just one sdk is retarded.
Anonymous No.106365405
>>106350353 (OP)
>langauge is just a not-needed meme
Not true. Dart / Flutter supports all major desktops and it's better than Gtk and Qt.
Anonymous No.106366422
>>106364874
dart in your nutz nigga
Anonymous No.106367431 >>106367656 >>106368961 >>106372541
>>106365382
>Qt
License fuckery, plus C++ and Qt Creator suck.
>react native
Support for desktop adds isn't supported by the original creators, Microsoft created the desktop libs (Windows and Mac only lmao, so not truly cross-platform).
React Native for the desktop is also not popular enough to get proper help if you need it and it doesn't have as many useful libs. Plus Dart is a better language than JS/TS and it compiles to a native binary on the desktop.
Anonymous No.106367656 >>106367742
>>106367431
>sperges out about nonexistence licensing issues
>outs oneself as a freetroon
>go to point one where freetroon bitches about an LGPL software product
bonus:
>nooo you cant use software maintained by third parties. that goes against my troonix desktop foss principles
Anonymous No.106367676
>>106350535
>usecase
Flutter
Anonymous No.106367742 >>106368927 >>106368927
>>106367656
>non-existent licensing issues
Until you need to ship a bundle without wanting to pay.
>freetroon
If it doesn't support Linux, it's not really cross-platform.
>freetoon bitches about the LGPL
Actual freetards would complain the LGPL is too permissive to proprietary software.
>you cant use software maintained by third parties
Actual freetards love 3rd party forks and repackaging.
Anonymous No.106368927 >>106369074 >>106369256
>>106367742
>Actual freetards would complain the LGPL is too permissive to proprietary software.
Yet that's what you're doing, you utter retard.

>>106367742
>Until you need to ship a bundle without wanting to pay.
Damn, that's crazy. Guess I forgot to renew my glibc license.

Did brown hands type this or is this just the average amertifat zoomer with zero introspection skills?
Anonymous No.106368961
>>106367431
>License fuckery, plus C++ and Qt Creator suck.
Nobody is paying for Qt chud, and yes, RAD tools are dead.
Anonymous No.106369074 >>106369256
>>106368927
>Yet that's what you're doing, you utter retard.
No, I'm saying it's too restrictive.
Anonymous No.106369256 >>106369375
>>106369074
>No, I'm saying it's too restrictive
>>106368927
>Did brown hands type this or is this just the average amertifat zoomer with zero introspection skills?
Anonymous No.106369323 >>106370338
>>106354864
>Why don't you use tauri for your apps
>built on Rust


>Build your app for Linux, macOS, Windows, Android and iOS - all from a single codebase. Write your frontend in JavaScript, application logic in Rust, and integrate deep into the system with Swift and Kotlin.
kek
Anonymous No.106369375
>>106369256
>if I keep repeating my bullshit, I win!
Retard.
Anonymous No.106370338
>>106369323
Problem?
Anonymous No.106372541
>>106367431
>Qt Creator suck
I hate this shit so much
Anonymous No.106374076
>>106350353 (OP)
can't penetrate market where TypeScript already was estabilished as lingua franca, with packages for anything from single-line hello world to single-line revive roman empire.
same thing with windows phone vs android: everyone already chose one and they don't wanna bother changing even to a better choice.