← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106361356

35 posts 4 images /g/
Anonymous No.106361356 >>106361379 >>106361418 >>106361787 >>106361825 >>106361836 >>106361849 >>106361958 >>106362432 >>106362728 >>106362761 >>106365155 >>106367032 >>106367055 >>106369182 >>106369388
It's actually popping
It's... HAPPENING!
Anonymous No.106361379
>>106361356 (OP)
But when will the AI (Actually Indians) bubble pop? Or will that one take humanity with it?
Anonymous No.106361418 >>106361730
>>106361356 (OP)
this is what they always say whenever a new cost-cutting technology pops up. no one will remember these statements 10 years from now.
Anonymous No.106361675 >>106364893
the goal is to fire all white male programmers then in 2 years when the ai bubble bursts you replace them with foreigners claiming there are no "qualified domestic applicants" because they all have 2 year gaps in their work history
Anonymous No.106361730
>>106361418
>whenever a new cost-cutting technology pops up
HR roasties are tech?
Anonymous No.106361787
>>106361356 (OP)
>replace all junior staff with AI
>have no junior staff to tell the AI what to do
Understand?
Anonymous No.106361825
>>106361356 (OP)
The only reason aws is still competitive is because Amazon has better engineers than Microsoft.
Anonymous No.106361836
>>106361356 (OP)
Just write a better prompt bro , dont be luddite
Anonymous No.106361849
>>106361356 (OP)
>non-Indian non-jew white CEO says he wants real people
Not shocking at all
Anonymous No.106361958
>>106361356 (OP)
Yeah, you use it to replace middle management.
Anonymous No.106362432
>>106361356 (OP)
that cunt refers to jeet junior staff
Anonymous No.106362728
>>106361356 (OP)
they work for free, don't they?
Anonymous No.106362761 >>106362774 >>106367032
>>106361356 (OP)
This is a textbook case of a large corporation trying to fend off potentially distruprive AI-based startups.

Expect them to start pushing for manual review of code, randomized security audits by a government agency, minimum education, experience, and training requirements for tech executives - anything that will slow down the rate of progress.

They're fucking terrified.
Anonymous No.106362774 >>106362785
>>106362761
Can I join your disrupte startup? I make nice coffee
Anonymous No.106362785
>>106362774
Apply here.
https://asiz.org/
Anonymous No.106364590
Anonymous No.106364669 >>106365140 >>106365155 >>106366436 >>106367038 >>106369195
LLMs are good for:

1: Letting students cheat on assignments
2: Letting Email-Job office workers send useless emails faster.
3: Replacing time-wasting chatbot pajeet customer service workers who are following mindless scripts anyways

And that is the only output of the trillions of dollars of AI investment. The only ones who are still enthusiastic about this bullshit are 75IQ pajeets who are begging for jobs
Anonymous No.106364893 >>106365223
>>106361675
Isn't that a good thing?
Anonymous No.106365140 >>106367049
>>106364669
You forgot the primary purpose of ALL AI threads on this board thoughโ€” cooming.
Anonymous No.106365155 >>106367056
>>106361356 (OP)
>>106364669
the only thing AI is thriving is porn lol
Anonymous No.106365223
>>106364893
It depends on your zhiditty.
Anonymous No.106366066 >>106366412
>spend gorillions on GPUs, electricity and R&D
>all of that funded by burning investor and/or government money
>throughout the next year GPUs slowly burn up and become obsolete
>meaning you must waste gorillions on new GPUs
>all the while never making a profit or coming closer of breaking even
This isn't sustainable at all. Replacing junior staff with chatbots is really, really dumb.
Anonymous No.106366412 >>106366436 >>106366809
>>106366066
its retarded even if LLM's were productive and cheap. you replace juniors, then seniors retire, what then? literally nobody skilled will be left
Anonymous No.106366436 >>106367011
>>106364669
>Letting Email-Job office workers send useless emails faster.
Had a hilarious encounter involving this
>start writing bulletpoints full of typos and giving them to AI to turn into corpospeak emails
>feed the emails I receive to the AI directly and ask it to give me bulletpoints and quick summaries
>chilling with coworks, tell them that I have been using AI for that
>everyone has been doing it too
>now we just send each other bulletpoints, we don't even bother with "hello" in the opener

The next step of "AI as the middleman" is the removal of the middleman in his entirety.

>>106366412
You know damn well that they don't think that far though. They will "just" hire more seniors when the need comes.
From where? Ain't the CEO's problem. As long as this quarter's number is green, it's a job well done.
Anonymous No.106366809
>>106366412
That's a problem for next quarter/next CEO.
Anonymous No.106367011
>>106366436
I am a technical lead and I write like 1 email a month. I converse with coworkers in calls or chats on Slack. Live demo or some markdown notes on the screen if I have to present something to them or the other teams, no powerpoints.

I wonder what it is like to have a job that merely imitates human communication all day. Are you LARPing?
Anonymous No.106367032
>>106361356 (OP)
And yet it happens.

>>106362761
>Expect them to start pushing for manual review of code, randomized security audits by a government agency, minimum education, experience, and training requirements for tech executives - anything that will slow down the rate of progress.
I agree with all of these things. Fuck corporations.

You gave us accreditation gauntlets, now have yours, faggots.
Anonymous No.106367038 >>106368917
>>106364669
>Letting students cheat on assignments
I could literally do better with google. AI arguably does this worse than old pre-nerfed google.

It never sources shit correctly and that's why it's bad for this.
Anonymous No.106367049
>>106365140
But it's the best thing AI has contributed to.
I cannot believe it's this amazing even. kek. Greatest invention for cooming.

Until it was nerfed with censorship.
Anonymous No.106367055
>>106361356 (OP)
> looks at AI to replace C-suite positions.
They'd never.
But actually?
(It would work)
Anonymous No.106367056
>>106365155
And rightly so.

I don't why people think this will replace real artists, because I was already shooping their art for personal use when it was "off". AI arguably just makes that faster and makes consuming real artist content faster.
Anonymous No.106368917
>>106367038
I mean, if you provide it with good sources then it's pretty much flawless. The problem is students who want to cheat with it don't even want to put in the bare minimum effort into cheating.
Anonymous No.106369182
>>106361356 (OP)
>Not training a next generation of senior devs is BAD!?!?!
Wew, who would've known that not hiring junior devs means there won't be senior devs in the future?
Anonymous No.106369195
>>106364669
And all it costs is forcing everyone to question whether any piece of art they read or see was generated by a computer for the rest of time!!!
Anonymous No.106369388
>>106361356 (OP)
based