Thread 106361410

>>106361410 (OP)
become Ameritel

>rename it as inTrump
>move its headquarters to tel aviv
>inject 5 trillion golemcoins

>>106361410 (OP)
fucking surreal
imagine telling anyone 10 years ago that intel would be in such hot water

>>106361410 (OP)
Put everything into Intel Arc GPUs and SSDs.
They are so close to beating Radeon.
Then just shamelessly copy AMD’s 3D cache
Finally, drop big.Little. It is gay.
Finally, free Thai ladyboy sex for the Arc engineers

>>106361543
> Put everything into Intel Arc GPUs and SSDs.

This.
Optane is the most performant SSD available to consumers.

I’ve only bought two GPUs in the last 5 years. An A770 and a B580. Not because they are great. Because I wanted Intel to see enough demand to keep investing in Arc.

>>106361410 (OP)
Get the money back.
They got bled dry unfortunately.
It’s like when your girlfriend is a vampire, and you spend your entire life feeding her.
It’s inherently dangerous, and you know that, but you keep on taking it close to the brink.
One day, you take it too far… beyond the tipping point, and you can’t be saved and you die.
Then, you too become a completely controlled vampire puppet. Not alive or dead. Just an existence of subservient shell.
This is where intel is heading.
NVIDIA and Google are next with their Mellanox and Wiz deals heralding in the new era of funneling.

>>106361410 (OP)
buy Trumpcoin

>>106361410 (OP)
Consumer AI cards

>>106361517
intel always had a monopolistic position since the deal with IBM and used legal pressure to kill any unauthorized competence like Cyrix, programmers using the quickness of their architectures instead a more agnostic approach and the retarded "5% faster halo" favored intel for decades.
all the competition were small fabs making copies of slightly older designs to fulfill a requirement of IBM and anti-trust laws.
AMD couldn't even design a CPU from scratch until the second half of the 1990s, and for some thing like good caches they're years behind. During the 90s Intel wasn't the best x86 CPU designer, let alone CPUs in general, but they had an advantage in fabs+IP for x86.

>>106361410 (OP)
Go unwoke?

The US will prop them up, no matter the cost. The supply chain issues experienced during COVID really woke up the powers that be.

>be intel
>build your own processor architecture which has been spread all around the world and was the most common architectured to be used
>inferior chinese crap spreads more and gets used more and more because its cheaper
Hm. Also maybe don't build CPUs that burn down your house? Is that so hard?

>>106361517
>fucking surreal
more like the clockwork mechanism of capitalism

>>106361605
IBM contributed significantly to the PC and tech
It was vastly better for the public than the silicon valley leeches that followed its demise

>>106361410 (OP)
If they had received the CHIPS Act funding without the deal being altered further they probably would have used it to spin off manufacturing and survive like AMD did as a fabless company with some onerous but not fatal wafer supply agreement
All roads lead to spin off. It is just the way the US structured its economy. If a company should be doing something useful (building chips) it cannot diversify into building other chips no instead it has to become a shitty finance company (e.g. Intel Capital)

>>106361577
> Optane
It’s dead, Jim.
It was just the storage equivalent on Itainium.
In this case, it was Micron that actually invented it, and most of the fabrication for Optane was done in mainland China (western Taiwan).
In Itainium’s case, it was HP’s design.
They had been just re-sellers already.
This goes the way back to bubble memory…it’s amazing they lasted as long as they did.
They should have stayed in their respective lane.
They peaked around the intel 386 days as far as I can tell.

>>106361642
you crazy stfu white boy

>>106361410 (OP)
i read somewhere that intel was 2.5% of all US exports in 2019
really how did they fuck up so badly

>>106361543
> They are so close to beating Radeon
Where do you think they are licensing the patents from they’re using to make those GPUs?

I’m pretty sure they are selling them at a loss to break into the market like Kia was.
But that’s not sustainable.
Same with Optane that the licensed from Micron.
They knew it wasn’t viable.

I remember when they said Atom was going to kill ARM…. Intel’s best efforts had 4 *times* the power per compute unit of ARM so that was going nowhere.

>>106361695
they make 200w tdp mid tier cpu s
raptor lake i7/9s frying themselves pre patch
ultra series failure
et cetera

>>106361695
underestimated how much energy efficiency matters in an age of mobile devices
overambition with shrinking their nodes
>more cores will solve this

>>106361717
but that's where they are making money
their consumer CPUs!

>>106361605
> AMD couldn't even design a CPU from scratch until the second half of the 1990s
Nonsense. AMD are one of the OGs.
They were asked into the Intel cpu sphere due to second source requirements if the us government.
Thank god, eh? Now that contingency is becoming reality.

>>106361410 (OP)
whoring out to nsa

>>106361410 (OP)
Stop doing hundreds of billions of dollars in stock buybacks over 30 years?

>>106361883
> hundreds of billions
They’ve spent hundreds of billions on building at least 3 “fab plants” 20 minutes from the lebanon border on a fault line.

It makes “crystal pepsi” and “new coke” look like genius business ideas.

>>106361866
> whoring out to nsa
The “security processor” in every modern intel CPU wasn’t even designed by intel… they licensed it!
That likely means they were technically bankrupt already… for a loooong time.
So, their demise was inevitable, they were just treading water until major stakeholders could get their money out according to their charters.
(You can usually only take so much out at a time, or per month/year). Reminds me of Tesla.

>>106361410 (OP)
By using trump.
Last I heard they’re making TSMC buy 59% of their stock.
Protecting israeli companies is the solemn duty of enslaved amerimutts.

>>106361855
>>106361605
My first home PC was a 386 made by AMD, I used to play Wolfenstein and Doom on it. Very similar to pic related. Don't remember when we got it originally, around '89 I think.
All of my CPUs since then were AMD.

>>106361855
>4-bit slice
They're relying on intel designs as per agreement during all the 1990s and that nearly killed the non-authorized AM386.
Their first true x86 designed in-house was the failed K5, that was phased out and replaced with the non-AMD K6. Everything else was way simpler (for embedded systems) or based on other's designs. AMD was tiny compared to intel pre 2000s and their main business was the fab.

>>106361935
I know I cannot expect anything near accuracy on 4channel but all plans of manufacturing expansion outside of the US was cancelled. Ireland, Germany, Israel. All gone.
Here it was complained about by local politicians but it turns out we hadn't paid them anything yet and the tax rebates hadn't applied yet so... I guess they have us by the balls

>>106361410 (OP)
install gentoo

>>106361410 (OP)
They aren't going bankrupt anytime soon. Worse case they sell off their fabs. They have double their liabilities in assets (most of which is fabs and equipment). All of their latest CPUs/GPUs were made on TMSC nodes showing that their fabs aren't needed anymore. If you ever bother to actually look at their financial reports the fabs are literally bleeding them dry since 2023 (prior they were making ham over fist in NET income). Plus they still have nearly 20B in cash/short term investments. Intel could have another year like 2024 and still be fine.

Also in 2024 they wrote off their entire Intel 7 line as a failure which is why they had nearly $17B in NET losses. If Intel 18A is a failure (which we won't know until 2026/2027) then they would have to sell off their fabs and go TSMC.

>>106361410 (OP)
publicly lynch their two indian ctos

>>106361410 (OP)
Avoid? But they've been working so hard to achieve it...

>>106362151
they've been doing multi-billion dollar impairments every quarter since that Intel 7 failure
we can be pretty sure 18a is a failure already

>>106362203
>more cores of a failed, inefficient architecture are le good

>>106362264
kinda? for some jerk off workloads like transcoding in CPU

make chips for steam deck 2

>>106361866
They already do that, though.

>>106365317
well obviously they'll pay them more now that theyre desperate that's how it usually works out. they can play hardball.

>>106361410 (OP)
Fire jeets and put Jewish transexual in charge

>>106361410 (OP)
With Trump's support, Intel has been handed the infinite-money cheat.
They will never fail and you will be forced at gunpoint to buy a $1499 Core 9 Ultra 395K, The Best CPU in the world!