Thread 106363108

Why does Asmongold want Age Verification so badly?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1mfoI1ouWE

Back in my day parents were responsible for their kids.

Teach kids, never, ever, ever give corpos your real information:

Your name: Bob Sagget
Your Dob: 1/1/1930
Address: whatever the whitehouse is

Or is it illegal for kids to lie about their age now?

The world where kids can't lie about their age is more dangerous to kids imho.


I hate Roblox okay probably more than you, teach your fucking kids to be safe online parents.

Also "confidential VMs" is homogay, it's just big tech speak for lol feel good about giving us your data but we don't actually defend against cpu bugs.


Also https://rms-open-letter.github.io/

30. LineageOS
35. Mozilla
58. Tor Project
61. X.org Foundation (lol use Wayland)

P.S. Why is San Francisco a fucking hole?

>>106363108 (OP)
technology?

>>106363108 (OP)
blockchain-based age verification is the future
if you want free money, you should go work on it so your system is the one that's adopted

>>106363129
An Indian

>>106363129
The push for age verification on "adult" websites which among other things is getting 4chan banned in the UK soon seems technology related to me.

>>106363151
Master troll or retard

>>106363168
>what is a zero knowledge proof?

>>106363211
You are an idiot.

https://blog.google/technology/safety-security/opening-up-zero-knowledge-proof-technology-to-promote-privacy-in-age-assurance/

Today, we open sourced our Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) libraries, fulfilling a promise and building on our partnership with Sparkasse to support EU age assurance.

https://blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/we-are-announcing-sparkasse-as-our-first-national-credential-partner-for-eu-age-assurance/


You give your details to SparkASSe

>>106363108 (OP)
how am i supposed to know

If the entire world wants age verification except for a handful of chronically online losers, then maybe we should have age verification? I don't know, just a thought.

>>106363108 (OP)
>Back in my day parents were responsible for their kids.
i agree that a website can't raise your kid right and neither is it its full responsibility, but this is still such a retarded and disingenuous statement. what parents have the time to look at their kid's screen and monitor exactly what they're doing without being too invasive?
>teach your kids to be safe online
and what if your kid ignores it and just watches gore anyway and you have no way of knowing because you are at work and nobody cares what their parents say?
like what does that even mean lol

just bite the bullet and show your ID if you really want to watch tranny porn all day or start torrenting it, but maybe your kids should have a fair chance to not be as retarded as you are

>>106363108 (OP)
>Back in my day parents were responsible for their kids.
And now they're not, they've given up that responsibility. Sadly, because we live under a gay-retard political system (euphemistically called a "democracy"), instead of criminally punishing these neglectful parents before they became a critical mass, we have to deal with the consequences of those parents' lack of action.

>>106363231
retard look up what sparkasse is
you verify you have a bank account so you can have permanent access to all adult content without revealing your identity
there's a lot to learn from germany
https://www.actuallygoodregulations.eu/

I am guessing he is tired of retarded kids shitting up the internet, but how the hell would i know?

>>106363255
It's just not technically feasible the way the internet is designed.
Governments will destroy trillions of dollars of GDP via age verification.

I don't like requiring verification but the idea of interacting with less children on the internet is certainly appealing so it might be worth it.

>>106363376
how would getting kids off the internet destroy trillions in value?
kids can't open bank accounts, drive cars, get married, vote, or drink

parenting all went downhill when women were allowed to vote

mass surveillance is evil and anyone supporting it should be killed with a rock.
simple as.

>>106363514
you paid your isp with your real identity omg

>>106363108 (OP)
>Why does Asmongold want Age Verification so badly?
he does not, he is just being pragmatical.
>Back in my day parents were responsible for their kids.
they aren't anymore and it started before ww2, we're seeing the downfall right now.
>Teach kids, never, ever, ever give corpos your real information:
good fucking luck getting apathetic millenials to do anything good given the absolute dogshit education they received from the worst generation of all time, the boomers, they can't die fast enough, they ruined the west beyond recovery, they're responsible for everything bad in this world and it started with reagan.
>The world where kids can't lie about their age is more dangerous to kids imho.
it was never about kids, crony capitalism (look it up, it's a real thing, it's not actual liberal capitalism (the best kind of capitalism) where the market is actually free and monopolies can't exist) is starting to fail, the oligarchs are getting scared because it's 100% their fault, they don't want people to know, they want poorfags to fight against each others and to be unable to coordonate. "muh children" is impossible to argue against if you aren't prepared for this fallacy.

He wants age verification because he thinks it will improve sites by preventing them from shitting everything up, what he doesn’t realize is that there are more than enough adult Indians shitting up everything now that it won’t make a difference

>>106363108 (OP)
if you've ever attempted to become a kind of eceleb of any kind you've had to deal with malicious trolls.
this user behavior of online harassment will eventually be treated by govts as crimes.
the mechanism that is enabling malicious online users to get away with abusive behavior, is that there are no forced ID verification checks to really use any social media service which exposes millions of users to contact with this person.
mandatory online ID doesnt need to happen at just a service level, it needs to happen at an ISP level when u connect to the internet.
ISP's need more powers to monitor users and anyone who disagrees is just a criminal seething that the internet is becoming more secure, not less.

It has nothing to do with age or protecting children. It's so they can connect online activity to individuals with complete certainty. Both so they can legally prosecute you for "misinformation" and so your identity can be leaked to your friendly neighborhood antifa cell so they can explain to you in person the right path for you to take (or else).

>>106363558
Courts have ruled over and over again that's not proof of anything because anyone could have been at the house using the internet connection.

>>106363805
now we need constant biometric scanning before being able to access the internet, go-guys