for img in *.jpg *.png; do
magick "$img" -strip -quality 85 "${img%.*}.jpg"
done
I'm not sure it's guaranteed to wipe all embedded data. In theory the lower you set quality the more likely data will be wiped.
>>106373601
I don't think there is any guarantee with any images. 4chan images are riskier because there is a userscript for embedding images and viewing them easily.
>>106373811
Also that magick command will lower your image quality so be careful about that if it matters to you. Some say they don't notice visual difference until going below 40. It depends on the type of image also and how much you zoom in. it
>>106373870
i see, so why else would i do something autistic as reconding the fucking images ? whats the worse that could happen ? there is some cp hidden inside or what ?
>>106374286
Apparently the tool 4chan uses to strip metadata from images causes images to increase in size sometimes. I've seen it happen to my images too.
>>106374304
though i'm concerned this blocks before upload, mine made it onto their server severaltimes, and its still fetchable, just it cant be uploaded anymore
have to find the original see if i can post it fresh
