>>106378102 (OP)
you really aren't missing much
>try generating text
>it hallucinates, it's overly tuned to reject you, and it just blabbers on for paragraphs telling you something that could be said in one or two sentences. it's sycophantic and brown-noses you constantly, which instantly makes it useless for having a real conversation or any kind of story (stories have conflicts, AI will just concede everything to the user)
>try generating code
>you're either competent enough at coding to not need AI to write code for you or you need to be competent enough to review the code that the AI writes. either way you need to know how to code, which really ruins the one use case everyone and their dog in the AI industry is reaching for.
>try generating images
>everyone can instantly tell it's an ai generated image because it lacks that human je ne sais quoi, flops at image editing because what it adds doesn't fit with the image which is probably actually a good thing because the world doesn't need accurate "make this person nude" apps right now
>try generating videos
>definitely cool but no use case as long as people can detect it as AI (and thus will become irate when used in movies or really anything commercial)
it basically makes low quality work for pennies of electricity and we do not have any demand for low quality work right now. in fact we have an excess of that. we've had an excess of that since the reagan administration. and i don't see much use for it outside of work tasks when it's fine-tuned for writing emails and brown-nosing
