Thread 106381220

They can march now

>starlord appears
DANCE OFF!

>>106381220 (OP)
Humanoids are a meme because we simply don't have energy source sufficient enough to make them autonomous to a practical degree.
>just plug them in
In this case it's just better to build stationary application specific robotics.

>>106381220 (OP)
Idk why China keeps flexing with agile robots.
West+Japan made clumsy robots that can walk slowly in 2009. Then agile parkour preprogrammed robots in 2017, and now are making AI powered precise dexterous robots that can do stuff with their hands. It almost looks like China is just flexing how performatively good and cheap their robots are as opposed to how good they are at doing actual work.

>>106381220 (OP)
1 push and that fucker will keep marching while lying face down. Current robots are still a meme, just pre programmed movements. No brain yet.

>>106381295
For home they could be plugged to the wall, give them enough battery to move to a different room and plug themselves in.

>>106381220 (OP)
>I do my little turns on the catwalk (yeah)
>on the catwalk (yeah)
>I do my little turns on the catwalk.

>>106381295
I agree that the legs are useless, but the reason why they are building humanoid robots with arms rather then just making task specific robots is because task specific robots have been proven to be unscalable. Humanoid robot could in future replace any manual worker with not much hassle, just plop them there, tell them what to do or download job specific AI, and then when you want to fire them you resell them. You can build these in bulk and still find endless number of customers. Task specific robot will get like few offers, which requires each robot to be handmade with no economy if scale, probably have no universal standards, be impossible to resell and finally require paperwork and planning to implement.

So ironically it is the task specific non humanoid ones that are attractive to dumbasses who will waste money on useless bullshit while the more economic decision is to use a humanoid unless you plan on buying 50 or more of them to do one job.

>>106381295
Solar needs to get into a place where charging fast and keeping powered for the day would be the answer.

Sadly, Solar hasn't really evolved since the 1990's. You can get some "better" panels, and you can get yard decorations and shit with tiny panels on them but you can't power a computer with solar sunrise-sunset off just solar itself. You need a battery and stored energy off it.

>>106381346
Uninformed retard alert. Robots are able to balance and adapt little bit to the environment for the past decade. You can look up robots doing some meme task like carrying boxes while people push them, punch them and move the boxes around.

>>106381220 (OP)
Will robots make war obsolete or will they keep fighting each other with robots? Will governments use them to control the population?

https://youtu.be/lyy7y0QOK-0

>>106381309
>why is the home of worthless disposable crap making worthless disposable crap

>>106381220 (OP)
Why do all robots seem to have a tight gap?

>>106381246
This the most vile fucking post I've seen all month I genuinely hope you get pancreatic cancer.

these closed loop demonstrations are so boring. i miss when they would be shown autobalancing against external forces, or juggling objects in chaotic patterns. these fixed sequences are dull in comparison.