>>106384648
No. Although personally I just don't feel comfortable using it, not in an ethical sense or anything, just in terms of layout and whatnot. Might just be baby duck syndrome.
>>106384495 (OP)
A good alternative is the Brave Browser. no need for any custom user.js that requires constant updating just change the in browser settings to your liking and thats it forever. Brave is the most reliable and fast browser thats out and it makes trannies seethe
>>106385124
same here fren, i've been using firefox for like 15 years, couple of years ago i switched to librewolf because i foundout more stuff about mozzila, i also have ungoogled chromium installed but i dont use it
>I've been using Firefox since like...high school? >i've been using firefox for like 15 years
baby duck syndrome makes people use the shittiest firefox based browsers instead of moving on to chromium based browsers like everyone else
>>106385934
Installed instantly for me with flatpak. Looks like it's convoluted to update extensions on it though and flatpak might interfere with chromium's sandboxing. Also firefox works fine for me.
>>106384495 (OP)
A small number of sites dont work properly. Notably in a specific online game that has corrupted sprites when not running on standard Firefox
>>106384495 (OP) >Take existing open source browser >Add shit to it
Why does everyone do this? Where are the projects that take these and rip it down to the bare essentials to make fast, resource light versions? Where's my Aluminum browser? My AirFox browser? My Zoo browser?
>>106385038 >>106385235 >>106385318 >Brave is based on Google LGBT Chromium >Brave is proprietary (no reproducible binaries, so the provided "source code" is unrelated) >Brave sold user data >Brave stole money from users >Brave manipulated referral links >Brave directs full internet traffic (including searches) to their servers >Brave is one of the largest supporters of LGBT (over 16 million dollars per year given to LGBT)