Thread 106384834

hahhhahahhahHAAHHAHAHAHHAhahHAHAHAHaHAHaHAHhaHhaHAHaHAHAHhaHahaHAhahHaHahahHHA

>I CAN'T PROMPT!!!
skill issue

>>106384834 (OP)
You are already left behind.

you laugh but people are putting that in their resumes now

>>106385201
Let me laugh even harder.

>>106384842
Yeah these luddites are retarded.
They will be replaced by AIGODS

>>106384834 (OP)
legitimate skill but i get your issue with someone who assumes they have some skill because they know things like "reply in a concise manner"
but the way i am with it, i would classify it at an elite level, especially in that i developed ways to use it all in a free manner. for example having local databases for context grabbing quickly, inserting into the prompts. managing the responses, rubber ducking conversations in a good database for easy referencing. quickly inserting different personalities and workflow expectations into the prompt with quick macro dropdown lists, only needing to add the actual specific query related to the problem into a text box.
i go so quickly, have such powerful retention over the solutions, implementations, organization, etc. that its the modern way to be an actual computer hacker in everyones shit while everyone else is ooo'ing and awww'ing like they got their first internet connection

>>106385243
LLM wrote this post

>>106385267
was it the rule of threes i used? yeah damn, i notice LLM use them a lot but its just a convenient way to write. maybe the "LLM" is changing "me" br0
https://youtu.be/9Ch4a6ffPZY

>>106385314
btw that video became a prompt!
Write as a human, not an LLM. Avoid these AI red flags:

1. Don’t overuse em-dashes — use them rarely and only when natural. Prefer commas, semicolons, or periods.
2. Don’t fall into repetitive parallel structures (“it’s about X, it’s about Y”).
3. Avoid the cliché “rule of three” style list (e.g., always grouping in threes).
4. Don’t present information as overly neat or mechanical lists unless context requires it.
5. Be concrete and specific; avoid vague platitudes or generic summaries.
6. Minimize filler phrases like “in today’s world,” “it is worth noting,” “in summary.”
7. Don’t make grammar and flow *too* perfect — slight quirks, casual tone, or imperfection are fine.
8. Avoid relentlessly neutral or positive tone; take natural stances, include nuance or edge.
9. Vary sentence length and rhythm; don’t let it sound metronomic.
10. Don’t stack multiple stylistic crutches (em-dash + parallelism + filler) in one sentence.

Write confidently, with natural variety, as if you were speaking or writing casually to another person.

>give me a typical reddit text post OP. very normal, realistic example of it
Here’s a pretty “normal” Reddit-style OP (like you’d see on AskReddit, r/relationships, or r/Advice):

**Title:** My roommate keeps eating my food even after I’ve asked them to stop. What should I do?

**Body:**
I (24M) live with a roommate (23F) and we split groceries for common stuff, but we each buy our own snacks and meals too. Lately she’s been eating my stuff without asking — frozen meals, energy drinks, even leftovers I was saving.

I’ve asked her a couple times to stop, and she always apologizes, but then it happens again a few days later. It’s not about the money so much as the principle and the fact that I feel like I can’t keep anything for myself.

Is this just a roommate thing I have to deal with, or should I be firmer about setting boundaries? Anyone else been in this situation?

Do you want me to make one in a **specific subreddit style** (like r/AskReddit “prompt style,” r/AmITheAsshole “judgment style,” etc.), or just keep it “generic Reddit OP”?


>>106385328
>drops this

**Title:** Neighbor’s dog won’t shut up at night, I’m losing my mind

**Body:**
So my upstairs neighbor just got this little yapper a few months back. During the day it’s fine, but after midnight it turns into non-stop barking. I don’t mean once or twice. I mean hours. I’ve had to be up at 6am for work and I’m sitting there at 2 in the morning listening to this thing go off like a car alarm.

I tried knocking on their door one night, but they didn’t answer. Next day I caught them in the hall and brought it up. They acted surprised, said they’d “look into it.” Nothing’s changed.

I don’t wanna be *that* guy who calls the landlord or animal control right away, but I’m at the point where I can’t even relax in my own apartment. Anyone deal with this before? Do I just escalate or is there another way to handle it without starting a war with the neighbors?

>>106385240
Luddites did nothing wrong.

>>106385424
Luddites are retards against process. They must be destroyed.

>>106385435
Sir, the correct word is "progress"!

>>106385474
Ok saar you discovered me. I'm an indian from Bangladesh and I'm shilling AI.

>>106384842
>>106385240
I just made a prompt engineer agent for my claude code that will convert all my trash prompts into well constructed ones. Now what?

>>106385524
Create things, retarded luddite.

>>106384834 (OP)
I don't get why people think prompt engineering would be the next job. LLMs can easily do that too.

If anything, the next job frontier is AI overseer just to make sure the AI doesn't output garbage.

>>106384842
>too stupid to write code
>smart enough to tell a dumb machine how to write code
>smart enough to tell when its code has bugs
DOUBT

>>106385649
You have to tell the AI to check the code. don't be retarded, luddite.

>>106385435
Akshually, they're against kikery and imported pajeets.

>>106385661
You won't get it. Luddites have lower iq than pajeets. You will be replaced, chud.

>>106385652
And have you actually done that and had success? My experience is that it will eagerly spit out code (that doesn't work), and when pointing out that it doesn't work with the specific compiler error message, it will admit its mistake and then give me THE EXACT SAME CODE with nothing changed and it will say that it completely, 100%, absolutely fixed all of the bugs this time.
The more I tell it to fix it, the worse it gets.

>>106385684
Yes, I've written a lot of cool stuff without knowning how to program. That sounds like (you) problem, chud.

>>106385684
>"error code - fix it"
doesnt work. but this might
>okay the process where this is supposed to happen in the code isnt working.. we expect it to do this. add more debug code in these sections, whats the variables outputting, more terminal logs, go
>okay here are the more detailed terminal logs from those sections
>AHA, I see the issue! Thank you for providing those detailed logs...
etc, also you fail to mention all the times it gives you code that doesnt error out, for some reason you dont remember all those times it helped you.

>>106385702
also something people dont understand is "context". basically the length of the chatlog.
if you do the same "no it didnt work, error 1, fix it now!" back and forth 5 times in the chat log. and it has changed nothing in the code. any further considerations or improvements in the conversation are including this huge, irrelevant mass of data based around errors.

the correct way is to remove those from the context, or start a new conversation with the previous last working iteration of the code before it wasted all the time, and give it a proper detailed surgical prompt to fix/debug it.
this gives it a simple goal "heres the code, apply the detailed changes" fresh and shiny.

my mom uses AI, right, and i was amazed when i checked on her computer to see she has like... 15 chatGPT conversations, and she actually uses it a lot. but she keeps these long conversations going for one subject. but me, i have like hundreds, on multiple accounts. i compartmentalize everything and its something most people dont.

AI is really useful, what I don't understand is this cult like mentality around it, given that it's a relatively new technology, and what it is today will be very different in a year or less. Not to mention the sussy things the big companies have done to develop it and be at the top. I still remember that open letter some ceos wrote "warning" about the dangers of AI or some shit, and now they're all in on it lmao

>>106385797
Keep coping chud.
>i-i its just a tool
Nope, it was built specifically to replace programmers, artists and luddites in general.

>>106385801
I hereby prohibit you from further replying to me

>>106385801
>chud
knock off this chud shit, faggot. im the only one contributing knowledge in this thread and i hail hitler

>>106385812
>chuddly luddite meltie

>>106385814
Why are you insulting me? retard luddite.

>>106384834 (OP)
another good habit
>dump codebase
>ask it to create a style guide, database tables guide, a readme file, etc

in the future, these become extremely useful because they outline the features, potential, previous implementations, etc. of a system. so it can reuse functionality easily, and continue to create and sustain an efficiently organized modular system

>>106384834 (OP)
Every time I see someone calling someone else a luddite I picture some fat blue haired lady calling someone a bigot. It's the same energy.

>>106385920
Yes, most Luddite chuds don't really understand what they are trying to do.
Fortunately, this type of programmer is now being replaced.
>>106385933
What's your problem? Are you afraid of robots? (I would be if I were a programmer.) tic toc .
We chad vibecoders are going to replace chuds like you.

>>106384834 (OP)
>prompt engineer
promptstitute

>>106385997
>promptstitute
kek true, unless youre paying for it. then youre a primp (prompt simp). but in my case, i use the apis and shit but only for free. im giving them my data anyhow.

>>106385791
>but me, i have like hundreds, on multiple accounts. i compartmentalize everything and its something most people dont.
That sounds absolutely retarded.

>>106386032
look mom, im sorry for calling you out like that, it wasnt personal

>>106385957
What have you created, Anon?

>>106386075
Many things but I can't post them here.

>>106384834 (OP)
Yeah, that's how hard I'm laughing. 6 months on the job at $140k a year, almost 2x more than I made as a sysdev engineer. Your guffaws grow quieter as the rest of us leave you behind. Should've learned to prompt.

>>106386232
>Yeah, that's how hard I'm laughing. 6 months on the job at $140k a year, almost 2x more than I made as a sysdev engineer. Your guffaws grow quieter as the rest of us leave you behind. Should've learned to prompt.
Gen Z boss and a mini! Gen Z boss and a mini!

>>106384834 (OP)
>programming in html
>css as a backend (to style your butt plug)

>>106384834 (OP)
>Ai
>AGI

>>106385702
It has never once given me code that worked. But I only tried maybe ten times before giving up.

frog death

there'd be an explosion of high quality open source projects if AI really made programmers so much more productive
but it doesn't, so there isn't

>>106390846
Umm sweety, open source chuds are luddites and hate AI.

>>106390846
>open source
>a group of people collaborate on a project together
>ai does everything youd want in private
lol

>>106384834 (OP)
>Prompt engineer
>>106384847
>nonooo! you see you're left behind if you're not giving jews like sam altman and that south african failure money to run the same software you can run using a video card - for free
embarrassing

>>106390846
>there'd be an explosion of high quality open source projects if AI really made programmers so much more productive
the reason is simple to understand: it's much easier to sell the lie of its abilities to computer illiterate morons that drool on themselves and think facebook is the internet. experienced computer users, that have already been using ai shit longer than anybody aren't fooled. they don't give their money to jews in exchange for magic beans/lies and sit there pretending that a large language model knows anything about programming languages. the docile window licking retard learns nothing about how it works, their money is taken, society remains at the same level: docile drooling retards.

>>106392055
> window licking moron thinks large language models can program
lmao

>>106392344
>thinks
what do you mean? i make stuff with them, everyday. i can crank out a project that wouldve taken me weeks in 4 hours.

>>106390846
Yep

>>106384834 (OP)
Prompt Chief

>>106384834 (OP)
It takes a special kind of skill to make a free chink llm produce high quality fetish smut. You wouldn’t get it.

>>106392435
Prompt Lead Sr. Chief Technical Officer

Prompt enginigger

>>106392397
>prompt engineer

>>106392513
no argument, nothing of value said. low iq.
safe to dismiss this person as having no idea what theyre talking about and continue using tools that work and make me extremely fast, running circles around them

>>106392604
>low iq
>screams the rabid monkey that can't code and is barely able to string a coherent sentence together
it's hilarious how we have all this great technology and you're still losing. we really have made it to the "fake it until you make" arc of the time line where abject losers and failures such as yourself can just larp as a programmer, have nothing to show for it and probably call yourself an expert, and regurgitating ai slop without a clue about how any of it functions. then again, you're the same kind of lamer that was copy/pasting entire github projects made by other people into your own and taking credit for all of it. my dog is smarter than you. who are you fooling?
>prompt engineer
lmao

>>106392654
>you're the same kind of lamer that was copy/pasting entire github projects and taking credit for all of it.
Literally me in 2018 at highschool.

>>106392654
>strawman
>impotent rage
im not the one thats upset, i provided value to others in this thread. you arent going to convince me that the things i use everyday are in my imagination, so whatever you have to say about this stuff is based on a meaningless platitude. ITT you have provided nothing. just by examining our posts we can already determine i'm more valuable than you, output more information than you, and contribute more to the board than you.
>>106385920
>>106385791
>>106385702
>>106385402
>>106385243
youre getting outshined by someone you've labeled as a skid, not good

>>106392684
at least you're honest about

>>106392695
>low iq
>thinks he's an expert because he can mash his obese palms into a keyboard
>having a mental breakdown because people think he's a joke and needs to get good at computers instead of sucking on corporate cocks that limp stubby things attached to the who's who of losers on youtube and twitter
you see your problem is that you're too stupid to learn. you talk about iq but yours would only be a few points above the temperature of ice measured in Celsius. no amount of memeai technology will make you smarter. that ship has sailed out of port and sunk to the bottom of the ocean. get good, faggot, and stop crying like bitch. we're your intellectual superiors. get used to it.

>>106392772
Nta but how good is AI for programming nowadays? Is it true that i can replace coders?

>>106392772
i dont have a problem, though. you're projecting. i'm good. making projects quickly is nice.

>>106392794
kek why are you asking him? hes the most clearly biased person in this thread

prompttards are melting their brain away, they think they're good bc the AI sucks their dick but in a few months they will want to die, knowing they destroyed their own brain. AI gods will replace their worshipper too.

>>106393029
heres that superior OLDSCHOOL-REAL-TM engineer i was telling you about!!! oh.. whats he up to? muttering to himself, rambling about the end of the world...