Anonymous
8/26/2025, 3:18:59 AM
No.106385087
>>106385134
>>106385166
>>106385245
>>106385621
>>106385891
>>106386396
>>106386495
>>106386758
>>106388374
>>106388674
>>106389166
>>106389895
>>106390004
>>106390128
>>106390154
>>106390187
>>106390196
>>106390511
>>106391109
>>106391552
>>106391689
>>106391783
>>106391805
>>106391871
>>106391979
>>106395798
>>106396160
>>106400369
>>106400951
>>106401032
>>106401296
>>106401797
>>106401803
>>106402325
>>106402428
>>106403901
>>106404922
>>106409024
The worldwide assault on privacy persists, now targeting TOR. I never thought The Guardian, of all newspapers, would stoop to this level, as the article is filled with more misinformation than a typical Daily Mail piece.
TLDR
>The article is crafted to mislead readers into thinking that TOR is a company storing CSAM on its servers and refusing to remove it.
>Donors to the Tor Project are named and pressured to withdraw their funding
>Tor Project is demanded to include backdoors
https://archive.is/6qMDX
TLDR
>The article is crafted to mislead readers into thinking that TOR is a company storing CSAM on its servers and refusing to remove it.
>Donors to the Tor Project are named and pressured to withdraw their funding
>Tor Project is demanded to include backdoors
https://archive.is/6qMDX