Thread 106398125

you don't have an excuse anymore

I've been using an LG C6 since 2016 and it's pretty worn out. Burn in (technically burn out) mostly with red and in the centre yellow looks more green.
But it has near 20,000 hours and is almost 10 years old. I will be getting another OLED next year, not sure if I'll stick with LG or go with Samsung

>>106398125 (OP)
>the manufacture of the monitor itself claims there's basically none
>not none, "basically none"
lol. lmao.

basically none is not good enough.

How was burn-in solved? Ppl say all the time that it’s not an issue anymore and expect us to just believe them but never tell us why it isn’t an issue anymore? What changed? Was the technology refined? What specifically changed that made the issue obsolete?

>>106398125 (OP)
I still have two excuses. I do not want to spend the money, and I am fine with my shitty 40ms response time decade old IPS panel.

why cant mods just permaban people posting jpgs without a link
why
whats the point
why does anyone respond to a jpg
you can edit the jpg to say anything

>>106398211
>you can edit the jpg to say anything
journalistic integrity is near null these days, and seemingly most once good mainstream tech outlets are too afraid to say anything negative about a product, or if they do they gloss over it a little in order to ensure they keep getting new products to review. Even if we had a link, they are running affiliate programs, and get kick backs if you purchase through their link - do you trust them to be 100% objective in delivering unbiased opinions and articles?

>>106398171
Solved by marketing. See >>106398134

>>106398125 (OP)
>533 days
That's fucking nothing get back to me when they last longer then 10 years being left on 24/7

>>106398125 (OP)
consider the possibility of working on your reading comprehension you daft cunt.

>Fewer than two years to start noticing burn-in
That doesn't sound good

>>106398246
I like this point. It's adapted to this era I'm afraid.

>'after using an OLED monitor for barely 2 years on varied content, the screen is only "a little bit" destroyed'
Wow, I'll run out and buy one right now! Wait, my IPS monitor is 4 years old already, and I'm planning on using it for an absolute minimum of another 6 years, probably more like another 16 years at the current rate of technological progress.

>basically none
>basically none
>basically none
why is any okay?

>>106398171
They "solved" it by making the screen run an anti-burn in cycle every day or two. What does the anti-burn in do, you might ask? Well, it averages the screen use by color and brightness, then inverts it, and burns out the rest of the screen to match.

Honestly, it's very clever how they called it burn in on OLEDs, despite the fact it's not an image burning into the screen anymore, it's different pixels burning out at different rates. If they called it what it really was, burn out, then everyone would realize that the screens literally kill themselves when you use them.

>>106398125 (OP)
>basically

>>106399270
>screens literally kill themselves when you use them.
That's not just oled screens, that's basically everything

>>106398125 (OP)
I want oled but not this qd oled garbage but a full and proper rgb stripe panel.
As far as I know only asus pro art series have those.

>>106399367
The issue is the general rate of degradation. I've got a hard drive in my PC right now that has lasted 20 years and is still ticking with daily read/write cycles. I generally expect to get maybe 7 years out of a drive.

My 20 year old monitor failed after the CCFL died, I could fix it for 10 bucks if I really wanted to, but it was easier to just buy a new one for 60 bucks with better viewing angles. Why would I buy something with a rated life expectancy far below what I consider acceptable for products in that category?

>>106398125 (OP)
Regular LCD bleed-in on day 1 is worse than most OLED burn-in on year 5