>>106407218 (OP)
gonna reply to a fag from a previous thread cause I didn't get the chance
>>106385883
>a 12x weaker than a typical mid to high range desktop cpu
I very explicitly specified smartphones, and even said in my original reply
>It could maybe work if you designed it around high performance desktops, or assuming the user would pay a subscription fee to a pow completing service. But good luck making a standard that assumes that.
>costs 1e-5 per second (12 / 365.25 * 12 / 3600 / 12)
That's maybe a reasonable number for a high end desktop. Not for a 12x weaker than high end desktop.
