Thread 106408154

remember to apologize to your local schizo

>>106408154 (OP)
This never makes much sense to me and I wouldn't be surprised if it's bullshit. The pictures don't make sense for starters.

>>106408176
It is bullshit because turning radio waves emmited by a wifi router into a radar takes much more hardware and software than what some bogus network hardware offers

Its beyond me how this shit is still going viral. It doesn't work, never was, never will

>>106408203
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10467185
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.04859
Then please explain this one to me. IEEE 802.11bf is a pretty scary spec man. It's tough to find the actual standard docs without paying a subscription but you're being very flippant and cavalier about something the IEEE seems very confident that this can work

Does it actually work for real-time mapping though? I could see it being used to map a static interior, and maybe getting a general location for anything moving around.

>>106408154 (OP)

totally unrelated
does your tv have dual mode display
there is tv program and there is textphrase white on black

>>106408154 (OP)
Apologize? I'm funding it. Enjoy being cooked alive in your clothes made of tinfoil.

If these are "wireframe renders of people scanned using wifi", why do they look as if they where wrapped in a stretched and distorted wireframe texture??... Like, what's the point?