Thread 106409353

Why does it cause so much seethe to the point that someone is going out of their way to DDoS their servers?

>>106409353 (OP)
Maybe their servers deserve to be DDoSed since they do not care about OpSec. They do not care about anything, really, I'm not even joking, this distro is "popular" just because of their overrated wiki, and because arch toddlers are suck spastic autists that cannot stfo about their software choices and desktop rices. Such insufferable cattle are Arch beasts.

it's the most tranny and /r/eddit distro out there

>>106409353 (OP)
it's only superior if the skill set you're looking to develop involves constantly fixing an OS that's broken by design, and you never use your PC for anything else.

>>106409437
>>106409451
>>106409460
What distro do gigachads like you use?

>>106409437
Another guy seething at Arch. He spams this pic. Why does Arch cause this much seething?

>>106409451
Arch has no tranny devs or package maintainers, while distros like Void, NixOS, Alpine and Debian were taken over by trannies. It's true that trannies like Arch a lot though, but the core team of Arch is tranny free.

>>106409465
MacOS. The white man's OS.

>>106409468
this is unironically the ONLY thing that matters.

>>106409468
every point in that pic holds truth if you dare to check them, but why I do care? you're a clueless arch fanboy plus way too obsessed with trannies to the point you're unable to think logically about anything.
>offers numerous technical arguments exhibiting why Arch is absolute dogshit
>TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES IN MY WALLS
That's about any argument with gullible fanboy.

>>106409437
The distro is popular because it's good and is the least pain in the ass distro to use compared to others and yes, having excellent documentation can really help solving whatever issues you may face on Arch compared to other distros where you would have to search solutions on a search engine only to find either a 10 year old outdated forum thread or a forum thread that has no responses.
>>106409451
If you care so much about how you look when it comes to using an operating system, then maybe (You) are the redditor and a tranny. If you let your ego be a deciding factor on what OS to use, and want to use an OS because you'd think it will make you look "cool" or "based", you're no better than those Redditors who kept parroting "i use arch btw". Does that piss you off being called a Redditor? Then that means you are projecting your own insecurity on Arch users as a whole.
>>106409460
Arch works on my machine all of the time. I don't know what you're talking about.
>>106409477
Wrong board
>>>/lgbt/

>>106409465
slackware, kisslinux and amogOS

>>106409353 (OP)
The real question is why use arch when you can use artix.

>>106409437
>>106409451
lol mad
>>106409460
Works fine for me

>>106410248
Because I'm white

Ran into far less issues doing AI shit on Arch desu. Even if it is a bit more work to get up and running like you want. Feels worth it in the end.

>>106409606
lol so much text of a butthurt wannabe hacker
I use Debian Sid and it's better rolling release than Arch will ever be

>>106410311
>Using a distro that is so ass that the creator killed himself

>>106409437
its much better to use windows 11 professional 2025 edition.
>renders gui with edge
>datamines you, your familiy and even your pets
>has different control panels / settings apps that each use its own legacy toolkits that spans decades
>shows you ads in the start menu
>enforces microsoft online account on install
>lags
>games run slower than windows 10 / linux
>new anticheat enforces secure boot to play call of duty with thomas the tank engine skins.

windows 11 matches perfectly with 5090 and sloppy UE5 games that gives you a stuttering 35fps in 1080p

>>106410311
> better rolling release than arch
doesn't even have the latest neovim package yet (v0.11)

>>106410319
>arguing on technical grounds? That's not my thing!
>I use arch btw