Thread 106412396

>>106412308
My fork predates the trannyization of Quake.
In 2012 "Lord Havock" (Forest Hale: lived in california, look him up (that's what you k_w_ fags are good at)) was a normal white "guy".

Then he disappeard for 3 years, from what I can recall.
Then there appeared a "LadyHavoc" next to the "LordHavoc" name on irc.

Some years later the "LordHavoc" name disappeared.
And some years after that the story was "LadyHavoc" ("ashley hale") is a "LordHavoc" who had his dick and balls sawed off.

No signifigant features were ever coded by "LadyHavoc"

While "LordHavoc" effortlessly built in complex animated modeling formats.

----
I am someone else: a mapper, and quake modder, originally a Unreal and Unreal Tournament mapper, previous to that a SimCity/StreetsOfSimCity/SimCopter player, not that a cunt woman like you would care (you're "above" what us "MAAALLLLEEESSS" like or do)

>>106412396 (OP)
>LadyHavoc hate thread
ok codelet

I see you deleted my previous thread, while claiming you had nothing to do with the threads not picking up.

Look how mad you are
<-----------------------------
HAHHAHHHAHAH

Mad you can't ban me?

>>106412396 (OP)
Hello again, sir

>>106412418
My code's right there, see the image.
I am going to kill you for banning Mitceria Kitsune from Darkplaces and Xonotic.

>>106412418
>>>106412396 (OP)(OP)
>>LadyHavoc hate thread
>ok codelet

Given I use code from 2012:
clearly I don't care about "LadyHavoc" at all, dipshit fuck.

Lord Havoc was a good programmer.
"LadyHavoc" is just an enemy of loco-for-loli paedophiles.

A feminist.
And "she" will be killed for it.

>>106412396 (OP)
Is there something about working with the old Quake engine spin-offs that make people go insane?

>>106412418
>Don't look at the John Carmack in the background.
Re-writing John Carmacks code does not make it yours.
"Darkplaces" is simply quake.

And I funded the addition of the cryptographic networking in "Darkplaces", and am the one that asked for it to be in.
Divverent (Rudolf Polzer) tricked you; at my behest.

>>106412451
>Is there something about working with the old Quake engine spin-offs that make people go insane?

It's using C when you should be using QuakeC.
I know you are calling me insane for not being pro-tranny, but "LadyHavoc" is the one who chopped "they" dick and balls off.

C can do anything: but it takes forever and you're always "fearful" of crashes when you add a new feature: that is you take a working stable program: and one feature can make it an unstable mess that can be ended by any player. So you have to test alot.
However since C can do anything: your mind races about all these "things" you could possibly accomplish. Then, since you don't have the talent or Will to do them: you add useless changes and not features.
That's what happens if you're only in the C world.

QuakeC can do only a limited amount of things: but it can do them quickly and fairly well. It's higer level on the stack of things. And you can simply build 3d worlds and not care about the implementation details.

If you only know C you'll be stuck in the pits, and go insane.
If you know various languages you can use the right tool for the right job.

Sometimes that's PERL.
(conversion scripts from Unreal t3d to quake .ent and .rtlights).

So yes: working exclusivly in the C engine does make people go insane. It takes about a month to get a big new feature to stop crashing. Now, the faggot here will say "SKILL ISSUE", while not showing "his" work.

But any C project needs to be extensivly tested for every single added feature. Or you'll get segfaults in a previously working project.

>>106412506
Why do the tools suck on linux? Model viewers, pak tools, etc.

>>106412444
>clearly I don't care about "LadyHavoc"
right
>In 2012 "Lord Havock"
>Then there appeared a "LadyHavoc" next to the "LordHavoc"
>Some years later the "LordHavoc"
>And some years after that the story was "LadyHavoc" ("ashley hale") is a "LordHavoc"
>No signifigant features were ever coded by "LadyHavoc"
>While "LordHavoc"
>>106412455
>Re-writing John Carmacks code does not make it yours.
(s)he never claimed it did

>>106412506
>It's using C when you should be using QuakeC.

This comment doesn't make sense. The engine code is in C but the game logic is done in QuakeC.

all i see is niggerniggerniggerjewninggernijewningernjewningjewnwinggnerniwnejewnewejwenejwneinggerjjejewjwew

>>106412536
Remember when I said I paid Divverent (Rudolf Polzer) to implement:
1) Cryptographic networking
2) Unreal style portals
3) laser beams in maps
4) simcity style fakelight (as seen in the editor, then added to the engine)

Now imagine what would happen if I hadn't have done so.
Would those features have gotten done.

Now: hackers and people like me are thrown out of opensource projects for not being pro-women's rights; they are thrown out of their own projects aswell.

What do you think happens then?

>>106412444
>LadyHavoc
>an enemy of [...] paedophiles
as if it's a bad thing

>>106412553
>>>106412506
>>It's using C when you should be using QuakeC.
>
>This comment doesn't make sense. The engine code is in C but the game logic is done in QuakeC.

You can do it in either, moron.
I've been programming this for 20 years, dipshit.
You come and tell me how it works?

FUCK you.
Shows you just know "how" things "should" work; and not how they actually work.

You'll now claim I'm lying because the reality doesn't fit what you believe.

>>106412592
YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
The world was made by him.
Just as the free C compiler was made by RMS.
>>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>>
>>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>>
>>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>>
>>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>>
>>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

>>106412597
>I've been programming this for 20 years, dipshit.
Yeah I can tell. Fuckin' nutter.

>>106412546
>>Re-writing John Carmacks code does not make it yours.
>(s)he never claimed it did
Shows what you know.
On IRC, 20 years ago, they were claiming
>"Well we've rewritten all the code by now, none of Id software code yet remains, that means it's ours now and we can relicense it as we wish"
>"Yes ofcourse!"

You weren't there. I was.
So fuck off.

>>106412618
Oh, because there's more Ds to expand into, right dipshit?

First I coded 1d programs: text console videogames.
Then I worked on 2d programs: CrossfireRPG additions.
Now I work on 3d programs.

Are there any more D's?
Dipshit fuck.

Again: you showed what a fucking neophyte retard you are by DECLARING "DURRR U ARE LYING, U CANT DO GAME LOGIC IN THE C, THAZTs FOR QUAKEC!!!!!"

>>106412629
You can out-crazy a troon.

>>106412649
>>>106412629(You)
>You can out-crazy a troon.
Good.
That's what it takes.

They need to be killed for opposing Loli brides
and removing Hans Reiser's code from Linux.

>>106412585
You didn't answer shit.

>>106412649
There's nothing more insane than Jesus' declaration that male and female do not exist

>>106412662
>They need to be killed for opposing Loli brides
You just hate them because you recognize each other as predators.

>>106412614
>YHWH explicitly allows child brides
doesn't mean he allows shagging them now does he?
>>106412629
>we've rewritten all the code by now, none of Id software code yet remains, that means it's ours now and we can relicense it
>they were claiming
>that means it's ours
>You weren't there. I was.
they've never claimed that
>we can relicense it
this they claimed and were right

>>106412614
literally kys

>>106412666
>>>106412585
>You didn't answer shit.
Yes I did, moron, learn to read you little fucking shit.
Unless you want me to come end your life.

Opensource has garbage because they do not fucking pay men to program what they want.

I _DID_ pay and I GOT what I wanted.
I still use all that code from those days today.
It was a good investment for me.

Other people do NOT pay and just whine: like you fucking faggot FUCK.

Secondly: opensource now excludes people women do not like. The very people that wrote the opensource code to begin with.

>>106412685
>>>106412614(You)
>>YHWH explicitly allows child brides
>doesn't mean he allows shagging them now does he?

Yes it does.
The word used is "tahpahs" which means "to take, as to take a city": it means to rape.
So yes: it does mean fucking the young girls.

There is no talk of "marraige" in the hebrew.
Only fucking the girls and owning them as a Ba'al.
Your christian translations paper over all of this
<----- Read.

Also you will just claim otherwise.

>>106412703
>wife
>rape
ok

>>106412690
>>>106412614(You)
>literally kys
Make me.

You cannot counter my arguments so you say "KYS". Like the usless impotent woman you are.

You can't even ban me from this website anylonger.
Want to go cry to the cops that I am violating your website's law?

>>106412716
>>>106412703(You)
>>wife
>>rape
>ok

Hey dipshit: the law is about raping young girls. They aren't your wife before you rape them. They are after.

Also "wife" does not exist in the hebrew. It's just "woman" "girl (female child)" "woman who has a master" etc.

There is no "wife" no "husband": there are girls and women who are ruled over by a Ba'al: which you christian cunts call "a demon".

>>106412691
>Opensource has garbage because they do not fucking pay men to program what they want.

Opensource is not transactional, too many fuckers view it with a business model.


>>106412703
Jesus was/is right.

>>106412685
>>we can relicense it
>this they claimed and were right
No, they are not right.
Their work is a non-seperable derivative of Quake. It cannot be relicensed against the wishes of the original copyright holders.

The original copyright holders also own the structure and make up of the code, no matter how many times you rewrite it.

You believe that Grsecurity can change the licensing of their patch too. And you are wrong.

As you are a woman, you will never admit as such

>>106412748
I've been in opensource far longer than you (you're not in opensource at all, you just look at it from adistance) CUNT WOMAN.

I've both programmed opensource programs, built opensource games, built opensource 3d models, maps, music, sfx, pixel art, textures, etc.

and,
paid for other programmers to do the opensource work I ask for.

You get what you pay for or do yourself.
Fucking cunt.

You'll argue with this.

And Jesus was a lying faggot.
There obviously is male and female.
He was simply a feminist, like you.

>>106412771
Good day, Ashkenazic demon.

>>106412750
>No, they are not right.
>Their work is a non-seperable derivative of Quake. It cannot be relicensed against the wishes of the original copyright holders.
right, except this has already been settled in the BSD suit

>>106412681
It is because they are feminists, much like you

>>106412681
It is because they are feminists, much like you.

>>106412681
>You just hate them because you recognize each other as predators.
It is because they are feminists, much like you.

Form follows function, Girls are for sex.
You, and your christians, oppose that.
You do not want men to have sexual intercourse with young virgin female children

Thus you oppose men marrying young girls;
or cast doubt as to weather mmmaallless "may" haves sex with their brides.

When the text in question is specifically about raping girls: which obviously occurs with sex.

You are simply eunich and woman enemies.
You hate YHWH for his pro-rape-of-girls anti-woman laws. You call him satan: as did your Lord: Jesus Christ. A person who told men to castrate themselves.

Something YHWH did not do, and opposed (not allowing such people in to the assembly of the Ruler)

YHWH allows child brides.
YHWH allows raping little girls and keeping them.
All ways for men to rule over women and girls.

Jesus does not: because he is the enemy of God: and said so when he declared God as Satan.
Which is why the Catholic Church fought against his doctrine for 2000 years and kept the Old Testament God's law in the air.

>>106412703
>child brides
She told you "No" 3 times.

I thought this thread was about making games in C. why am I seeing hebrew books? is this esoteric C knowledge?

>>106413071
>I thought this thread was about making games in C. why am I seeing hebrew books? is this esoteric C knowledge?

Troll threads from some schiz'd out pedo that is ass-mad about a fork of some old FPS game engine.

MICHAEL WHAT DID YOU DO YOU LITTLE SHIT THE POLICE ARE SAYING YOU'VE BEEN LOOKING AT CHILDREN ON THE DARK WEB AGAIN

`test
`test`
``test``