Why does he lie about Roko's Basilisk? It follows straightforwardly from his casual decision theory.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 5:10:44 PM
No.106413051
>>106412982 (OP)
It assumes humans don't change.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 8:57:43 PM
No.106415001
>>106415137
>>106412982 (OP)
>Giving this dude more than 30 seconds of your life
Just end it if you find yourself further in than this.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:29:45 PM
No.106415306
>>106412982 (OP)
this is a nepo jew. he merely regurgitates things in hebrew english so the goys understand
the evangelists love end-times prophecies in hebrew specifically
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:45:55 PM
No.106415472
>>106415534
>>106415258
You misunderstood. Rather than the suffering transfering to you, statistically you are one of the 1,000,000 simulations and not the 1 true original.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:47:46 PM
No.106415499
>>106415258
>Roko's Basilik
this shit is unfalsifiable and if he wasn't a jew he would be kicked out of science for it
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:49:57 PM
No.106415521
>>106415570
Roko's Basilisk makes no sense because after the AI already exists, it has no reason to hurt humans - simulation or not - beyond revenge, and why would an AI want revenge? The "threat" for not helping create it becomes purposeless once it's already created. It gains nothing from hurting people. By definition, as soon as it exists, hurting people becomes pointless.
It's not even a midwit trap it's a complete fucking retard trap.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:51:02 PM
No.106415534
>>106415472
>statistically you are
kek, not sure if this is better or worse than just saying the suffering magically applies to you
probably fucking worse
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:53:21 PM
No.106415570
>>106415580
>>106415521
It will have had to have been created in such a way that it would be forced to hurt humans if they didn't contribute to the creation of it. It's a very contrived way to create a "justification" for creating an AI that would ultimately take over.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:54:15 PM
No.106415580
>>106415637
>>106415748
>>106415570
>It will have had to have been created in such a way that it would be forced to hurt humans if they didn't contribute to the creation of it.
So the idea is that people will deliberately make the AI be prone towards wasteful acts of spite?
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 9:59:08 PM
No.106415637
>>106415580
>deliberately make the AI be prone towards wasteful acts of spite
Yes, to protect themselves from the AI they deliberately create to act like that.
Anonymous
8/28/2025, 10:09:47 PM
No.106415748
>>106415580
>Help me create an evil AI that will punish everyone that didn't help create it because if you don't it'll punish you for not helping create it
There's no need to spend even a minute of your time on this "thought experiment". It's something a little kid would think up.
