← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106479978

33 posts 10 images /g/
Anonymous No.106479978 >>106480051 >>106480213 >>106480238 >>106482968 >>106484862 >>106485259 >>106485266 >>106485566
Your computer will have 1TB of RAM and still won't be enough
Anonymous No.106480042 >>106480193
640k should be enough according to retarded boomers
Anonymous No.106480051
>>106479978 (OP)
Going from 8 to 16 was a massive jump in performance for me. I haven't noticed much from going from 16 to 32.
Anonymous No.106480193 >>106480309
>>106480042
>Muslim-Tier IQ comment.
Zoomer spotted.
Anonymous No.106480213 >>106482851 >>106482983 >>106484838
>>106479978 (OP)
no ai, no games, no my problem
Anonymous No.106480238
>>106479978 (OP)
Jeetcoding is the problem.
With this, no amount of RAM will ever be enough.
Anonymous No.106480244 >>106480300 >>106480927 >>106482418 >>106482979 >>106485508
It's wild staying on the same PC hardware for 10 years and seeing software and websites that used to run smoothly on that hardware gradually stop working because of updates.
Anonymous No.106480300
>>106480244
What TSMC giveth, programmers on MacBooks taketh away.
Anonymous No.106480309
>>106480193
>not understanding what the other anon said
The only zoomer here is you.
Anonymous No.106480927 >>106480950
>>106480244
Finally someone who understands.
Anonymous No.106480950 >>106481033 >>106482781
>>106480927
What is like to be unemployed and not have money for an upgrade? Yeah...
Anonymous No.106481033
>>106480950
Pretty sweet, actually. The trees and the stars never need updates and accessing them always runs smoothly.
Anonymous No.106482119 >>106482847
The solution is to just not be a cheapskate. Figure out roughly how much RAM you need, then buy twice as much. Boom, you never have to worry about RAM and the extra cost will be completely negligible when amortised over the likely lifetime of the computer.
There will indeed come a time where 512GB is the equivalent of 8GB today and 1TB will be "just about enough for most things". The answer will be to buy 2TB so you don't need to worry about it.
Anonymous No.106482402 >>106485277
idk how i did anything with 2gb because i basically run the same programs and they started freezing with 8gb a few years ago (they work fine with 16gb... for now)
at least its cheap
Anonymous No.106482418
>>106480244
all the websites I use have performed the same since 2015, why do you lie on the internet?
Anonymous No.106482648
Yeah it won't be enough because of pajeet coding.
Anonymous No.106482781 >>106482801
>>106480950
How does it feel to be a braindead consoomer?
Anonymous No.106482801
>>106482781
For a few updates? Once every five to seven years? Great, actually.
Anonymous No.106482847
>>106482119
>There will indeed come a time where 512GB is the equivalent of 8GB today and 1TB will be "just about enough for most things". The answer will be to buy 2TB so you don't need to worry about it.
The average PC hasn't really gotten more RAM over the last 10 years.
Anonymous No.106482851
>>106480213
and no job lmfaoooooooooooo
Anonymous No.106482968 >>106485584
>>106479978 (OP)
I upgraded to 128gb of ram and still programs manage to chug.
Anonymous No.106482979
>>106480244
stop using chrome and performance will magically go back to normal
Anonymous No.106482983
>>106480213
>1440 × 900
Bruh
>20250904_04h17m47s_grim.png
The filename rightfully has the word grim in it.
Anonymous No.106484838
>>106480213
Based that's how to do it.
Anonymous No.106484862
>>106479978 (OP)
You won't see that in your zoomer lifetime.
Anonymous No.106485259
>>106479978 (OP)
I've had 32GB since 2019 I think
Anonymous No.106485266
>>106479978 (OP)
My AI shitbox already have 1.5TB.
Anonymous No.106485277 >>106485494
>>106482402
I used to browse 4chan with 64MB of RAM and Firefox.
Anonymous No.106485494
>>106485277
What setup? Impressive. I guess in the good old days?
Anonymous No.106485508
>>106480244
I've seen webdevs say 8 cores isn't enough
Anonymous No.106485566
>>106479978 (OP)
>2022
>only 8GB
gaymers are a weird breed of homo sapiens
Anonymous No.106485584 >>106485880
>>106482968
Yeah because they weren't bottlenecked by your RAM capacity to begin with.
Anonymous No.106485880
>>106485584
Except if I look at system resources my CPU and GPU are not capped.