← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106484952

18 posts 4 images /g/
Anonymous No.106484952 >>106484960 >>106484968 >>106485561 >>106485730
New OS development is DEAD until we get an open source GPU
Anonymous No.106484958 >>106485706
And software rendering is shit a threadripper can barely run quake at 60 FPS
Anonymous No.106484960 >>106484978
>>106484952 (OP)
we did not need open source CPUs
whats the difference here
Anonymous No.106484968 >>106486898
>>106484952 (OP)
Why? Just help develop ReactOS and you'll be able to use closed source Windows drivers.
Anonymous No.106484978 >>106485872
>>106484960
The instruction set is openly documented, anyone can talk directly to the CPU. Talking directly to the GPU is not possible.
Anonymous No.106485561
>>106484952 (OP)

look at opensuse site what logo you see

look at wendor what product has tick in linux support box
Anonymous No.106485706
>>106484958
This is utter bullshit: I was running quake at 1280x1024 resolution DOS DJGPP commercial version at 60fps with an Athlon 64 (20 years ago) and no 3d gpu
Anonymous No.106485730 >>106486746
>>106484952 (OP)
It’s just Linux/DRM that sucks. The GNUmach at the core of the GNU/Hurd has native support for heterogeneous architectures with distributed share memory. Quite bitrotted that part, but I’m sure it could be resurrected as the basis of a sane open source GPU ecosystem
Anonymous No.106485851 >>106487019
AMD GPUs are open source though. The problem is with software compatibility. How do you convince developers to support your OS natively?
Anonymous No.106485872 >>106486713 >>106486728 >>106486995
>>106484978
can't you use the open source drivers as a basis?
Anonymous No.106486713
>>106485872
yes, enjoy rewriting thousands of linux drivers to your new kernel because for some reason you want to start from scratch
Anonymous No.106486728 >>106487204
>>106485872
those aren't drivers but just shims.
the actual gpu driver now resides in the gpu's firmware (gsp).
https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/issues/19#issuecomment-1159767527
Anonymous No.106486746 >>106486757
>>106485730
i member being super exited for metal when i thought they were going to go the crossfire-but-driver-level-and-invisible-to-developers route. i was so disappointed in how everybody just believes the lie that its impossible.
Anonymous No.106486757
>>106486746
oops, mantle.
Anonymous No.106486898
>>106484968
NT5x does not support modern graphics cards. And even if you did make NT5x support modern gpus, it would ruin everything since the Vista graphics driver model removed all GDI acceleration functions. Without GDI acceleration the windowing system runs like utter shit since pcie is as slow as treacle.
Anonymous No.106486995
>>106485872
didn't geohot do that with tinygrad?
Anonymous No.106487019
>>106485851
Money and convenience. Money makes the world go round and round.
Anonymous No.106487204
>>106486728
> the actual gpu driver now resides in the gpu's firmware (gsp).
Can I telnet into my GPU and ask it to draw lines snd whatnot?