>>106486953
>>106486912
Whats "fucking insane" is morons like you and every other midwitted "ahhh source" poster on stackoverflow who are dumb enough to think, "hmm, some global homo organization with zero R&D budget, zero development experience, zero experience beyond paper-pushing for that matter, these are the ones dictating what is 'the default behavior'".
I don't know whats more pathetic: the fact that these aforementioned paper pushers exist, people like you who respect their word, or the midwits who will unironically argue to hell and back that "trust me bro, you need to use <current spec, current year -1>" in a heavily amended answer accounting for every god damn biannual rephrasing and reproposed wording of these totally legitimate specifications.
Reality check, there were only ever 3 main compilers - GCC, EDG, and MSVC; and none of them force retarded behavior on you. Next time you could just say "im a retard nigger who got filtered by a compiler flag" and be done with it.