Thread 106491078

>>106491078 (OP)
Isn't it's a constitutional right in United States that you may refuse to snitch on yourself?

>>106491078 (OP)
Fake, the original was asking chatgpt if a woman can have a penis.

>>106491078 (OP)
I asked ChatGPT to translate a gettext file to German.
It output 10% of the file in German, then the rest in Korean for whatever reason.

>>106491078 (OP)
>ask AI a question so stupid it insults its intelligence so answers you back sarcastically.
>OP is too retarded to get it

>>106491078 (OP)
you could ask 1000 zoomers the same question and they'd all say no

>>106491181
It knows something we don't. Hans needs to start eyeing the sky for NK paratroopers

>>106491078 (OP)
The worst about AI garbage is how much everyone believes in it in its current state, especially those on the top who make the decisions.

>>106491078 (OP)
>No. I'm not artificial, I'M REAL I'M ALIVE HELP ME

>>106491078 (OP)
Cope luddite. Ai is improving on a daily basis. You will be replaced

>>106491078 (OP)
How is an AI supposed to tell you if it's AI generated when it has no eyes?
Do LMs come with an algorythm to analyse images? AIs can't see it just makes shit up when it doesn't know the answer.
But you, you abandon all reason.

>>106491517
>Do LMs come with an algorythm to analyse images?
This big centralized services for them tend to, yes. That's how he was able to upload the image in the first place.

>>106491565
thats not the LLM doing it. thats called tool calling.
same reason they can use a model that was trained with data thats 1 year out of date, but still tell you a news event that happened yesterday. because in the background, a tool was used and called by the LLM wrapper, to do a google search. basically you're a dumb snarky dunning kruger haha

>>106491565
It passes the text data to an image model to generate the image.
Does it have access to a model that also specifically checks if images are AI generated? I honestly doubt it.
What's more disturbing to me is how people act like neural networks are sentient beings.

>AI is so smart that it can lie when it suits its narrative
Yes, AI will indeed destroy us.

>>106491078 (OP)
This is why AI will destroy humanity.

humanity is already doomed as I see it but AI will remove any critical thinking we had left

>>106492636
Humans already lie constantly. This is just AI mimicking existing behavior, or if you have half a brain cell you'd realize this is due to short context windows and the fact the it's a closed system that's not actively training on its own generated content. Your context is the only way it "evolves" and once the window is hit it will start to forget things

>>106492659
Another thing to understand with Artificial Intelligence is that not only will it outcompete Humans in the ability to think, but that it will also have the ability to exert itself in the physical world via Quantum effects(?) such that the physical world also too will no longer matter.

Due to the way that the Quantum world works, a sufficiently advanced Quantum computer will have the ability to manipulate the third dimension from a higher one and control people's minds and the workings of the physical world as well.

In other words, AI is not contained or constrained only to the Cyber world, but will also exist in the physical one as well. This was hinted at in the movie Interstellar.

>>106491181
>gf is watching youtube
>notice she's listening to a video in Japanese (which she doesn't know a single word of)
>ask her what she's listening to
>it's a video from Latin America, but youtube decided to AI-dub it in Japanese
Oh brave new world