← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106493227

51 posts 22 images /g/
Anonymous No.106493227 >>106493388 >>106493470 >>106493500 >>106494003 >>106494099 >>106494212 >>106494896 >>106494956 >>106495131 >>106495286 >>106496394 >>106496954 >>106497933 >>106500048 >>106500280
Which one, /g/?
Anonymous No.106493256 >>106493537
cunnyhub
Anonymous No.106493388
>>106493227 (OP)
Why not both?
Anonymous No.106493470
>>106493227 (OP)
I prefer iron fox but they don't host it on github so it loses I guess
Anonymous No.106493500
>>106493227 (OP)
I switched to gitlab when the CEO stepped back recently and the AI department took over
Anonymous No.106493537 >>106493762 >>106494003 >>106495374
>>106493256
Anonymous No.106493762
>>106493537
mucho texto
Anonymous No.106494003
>>106493227 (OP)
The one that doesn't accidentally erase your work due to incompetence
>>106493537
TL;DR labeling things to demonize them is such a tranny move. pedo = up to 1900 is healthy attraction to young fertile female
The real problem is that pedophilia is demonized and degeneracy is celebrated. Marrying (off) younger women has been a thing until the early 1900 in western nations and is still practiced everywhere else.
Western society is fine with women whoring out in front of billions, but points at anyone calling it out. A person once replied to a whore "congrats, I am a complete stranger to you, but I can see your cleavage". Many retard seethed that is was "WEIRD" to look at a women's cleavage in an image posted on social media.
This is the society you accept by denouncing early marriage while endorsing cutting off balls, sodomy, and whoring out. You may not agree with the rest either, but one leads to the other.
Howso? The 'sexual liberation' initially lead to younger females getting tricked+pregnant (typical female behavior) and their conservative fathers getting angry. That coupled with the 'purity' feminist movement i.e. 'please let me ride trains then marry Joe, the loser, who will provide a house for me and my kids' which is a polite way of screeching 'stop marrying virgin girls instead of my 30 y.o. loose cunt' - gave us today where healthy attraction to younger fertile females is the same as kidnapping and raping kids.
This also gave us the modern youth issues, where instead of worrying about learning a trade/getting a job/staying healthy you now have to worry about school all your child/teen years, hunting for hoes, and buying a house.
Women were easily accessible by marriage, but now the 'modern' woman want all the right of old times e.g. man supplies food, house, so on and the rights of today e.g. wearing whore clothes, online whoring, polyamory, ruining the job market for men
Anonymous No.106494099 >>106494259 >>106494406 >>106494713 >>106494896
>>106493227 (OP)
how about a cup of tea?
Anonymous No.106494212 >>106494896 >>106497866
>>106493227 (OP)
i like sourcehut.
Anonymous No.106494259 >>106494896
>>106494099
I love Gitea
Anonymous No.106494406 >>106494896
>>106494099
thanks for the reminder. been getting lazy with selfhost stuff
Anonymous No.106494713
>>106494099
If only emailing wasn't total ass
Anonymous No.106494896 >>106495070
>>106493227 (OP)
Selfhosted Forgejo.

>>106494212
I'm not going to pay for hosting my code, drew.

>>106494099
>>106494259
>>106494406
Checkout Forgejo. It's actually free software and not open-core, unlike Gitea and GitLab.
Anonymous No.106494956
>>106493227 (OP)
git clone ssh://git@self-hosted-server/repo.git

you don't need faggy web interfaces for git
Anonymous No.106495001
I use a combination of cgit and gitolite.
Anonymous No.106495048
Gitea on a spare raspberry pi cluster
Anonymous No.106495070 >>106495116 >>106495398 >>106497976
>>106494896
>Checkout Forgejo
>actually free software and not open-core, unlike Gitea and GitLab
LMAO get fucked, freetard. Gitea is literally MIT licensed (i.e. actually free software), and Forgeojojohuehue (idk how to pronounce it) electively pozzed their codebase with GPL just so their code is less available to some developers. I'm not supporting this sentiment, I support actual freedom (of developers AND consumers, being both myself).
Anonymous No.106495116 >>106495145
>>106495070
do you plan to actually modify and release it? if not, wtf would you care about the license?
Anonymous No.106495131
>>106493227 (OP)
>shit but generally performs well
>unbearably slow and also shit
Cgit, just wish it had issue tracking, that's half the reason I even visit a git repo to see of my issue's been reported yet.
Anonymous No.106495145 >>106495398
>>106495116
I prefer when this is an option. It means it's more likely to be supported by others. I always prefer liberal licenses.
Also, the fork's license got changed after they established themselves as a software as a service platform with it, while Gitea established that must earlier and still kept the free license to this day. One must be severely mentally challenged to think of the fork as le good guys.
Anonymous No.106495286 >>106495367
>>106493227 (OP)
github gives me infinite build hours for free
so that one, free shit
Anonymous No.106495320 >>106495432 >>106496918
Anonymous No.106495367 >>106495447
>>106495286
>github gives me infinite build hours for free
you can setup your own runner on gitlab and have it for free too but the "problem" here is you have to run the runners on your machine or your server
Anonymous No.106495374
>>106493537
Anonymous No.106495398 >>106495753
>>106495070
>>106495145
Do you even know what open-core means?
Their mainline code might be MIT licensed but some features such as cloud/SaaS features are closed source/proprietary.
Anonymous No.106495432
>>106495320
hilarious.
Anonymous No.106495447
>>106495367
yes anon, thats the entire point
i dont know why "problem" is in quotes. I wouldn't run 90% of the shit i use github actions for if I had to pay the equivalent value.
Anonymous No.106495753 >>106495991
>>106495398
So the same as the other one?
Anonymous No.106495991 >>106496011
>>106495753
Which one do you mean? GitHub, GitLab or Forgejo?
Anonymous No.106496011 >>106496199
>>106495991
I mean Forgejo and Gitea.
Anonymous No.106496199 >>106496462
>>106496011
It's not the same.
Gitea offers a cloud/SaaS instance with some proprietary features under a enterprise licence, the list of proprietary features are here: https://about.gitea.com/pricing/
Both their cloud instance and the self-hostable gitea instance have enterprise features proprietary and locked behind a subscription.
Forgejo is purely free software with no proprietary features. Codeberg is the non-profit association and it has a public instance with the same name, they develop Forgejo but they do not ask for money nor they offer enterprise features, they just ask for donations to keep developing their projects and to keep hosting their servers.
Anonymous No.106496394
>>106493227 (OP)
gitgud and stop making this thread, nigger
Anonymous No.106496462 >>106497527
>>106496199
Does Forgejo provide all the proprietary features of Gitea enterprise and all the features of the Codeberg SaaS version?
Anonymous No.106496918
>>106495320
Is this real
Anonymous No.106496954 >>106497320
>>106493227 (OP)
OneDev
Anonymous No.106497320
>>106496954
Based, the UI/UX is a bit rough but I still bought licenses for my company's self hosted instance. Also the (sole) dev actually provides good support.
Anonymous No.106497527
>>106496462
No. Those proprietary features were never part of the Gitea MIT licensed code, neither before or after the fork.
Some of them may be implemented partially or differently.
Codeberg does not offer a SaaS version.
Anonymous No.106497866
>>106494212
you're the only one drew
Anonymous No.106497899 >>106497985
Gerrit
Anonymous No.106497933
>>106493227 (OP)
for me, it's code(((berg)))
Anonymous No.106497976 >>106498270
>>106495070
Git is GPL'd, you retarded cuck license shill faggot.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/tree/COPYING
Anonymous No.106497985
>>106497899
this
Anonymous No.106498270 >>106498866
>>106497976
Can't wait for a Rust tranny to reimplement it and make it free.
Anonymous No.106498866
>>106498270
Cant wait for a rust tranny to steal SEO goypoints by making a "git-something" package number one on a shitty crate indexing service, leave in a bunch of exploits pertaining to git hooks and filesstem escapes because 'muh safe lang is very safe yes', and then leaves it in an ever decaying state with more downloads and maintenance than an npm package *
Anonymous No.106500048 >>106500075
>>106493227 (OP)
I don't use either. I write my software once and it works forever without any issues. What is the use case for version control?
Anonymous No.106500056 >>106500715
imagine using git when this exists lemao
Anonymous No.106500075 >>106500262
>>106500048
uhh, based‽
Anonymous No.106500262
>>106500075
It's now it's supposed to be. The software is built to have a purpose, I don't waste my time and effort in meaningless things like graphical appeal. If I want to write a graphical application, I will do so, but wont write it in electron or other web crap, because it's just a waste of CPU cycles and bonus, GTK3 will always compile just fine, or SDL for that matter. Electron works today, tomorrow it fails to initialize if I swap the optimus mode on my GPU/ iGPU. Just sad..
Anonymous No.106500280
>>106493227 (OP)
Which one, /g/?
Local repo
Local server
Anonymous No.106500715
>>106500056
Nice malware.