Thread 106496251

Why can't open sores JUST WERK™?

Works on my machine.

>>106496260
No it doesn't

>>106496251 (OP)
Behold, the power of JUST WERK®™ at your fingertips.
https://github.com/futo-org/grayjay-android/issues

>>106496251 (OP)
>479 channels
wtf, i thought that my 90 followed channels are way too much. most of them are 1 video per year too.

>>106496291
Yes it does.

maybe if you stopped spelling things like a petulant child they'd work right iunno

in the case of Android, 3rd party apps don't compete on equal footing with google slop. For example, google maps gets the permission to access device's location while running in the background, whereas 3rd party apps cannot even request such permission. The most you can get is a "while using the app" permission.
>>106496251 (OP)
here it says "Job was c...", with the truncated part probably being "cancelled". Again, there are restrictions on what you can do in the background. This may be a coroutine cancellation caused by android deciding on a whim that grayjay won't receive any more CPU time. Turning off battery optimization for grayjay may let it run better in the background. But I can only guess, and I never used grayjay anyway.

>>106496251 (OP)
That's source available tho

>>106496324
Prove it

>>106496251 (OP)
it does, youtube (proprietary) breaks it on purpose.

Pipepipe just werks. Grayjay isn't even opensores, moron.

>>106497323
https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay

>>106498829
>Source First License 1.1
you were saying?

>>106498863
you said open source, it is open source.
If you want to cry about free as in freedom that is something else.

>>106496783
>google maps gets the permission to access device's location while running in the background
they may be depending on poogle play services to do it for them

>>106496251 (OP)
Compared to the other alternatives it's been working very good before the last few updates

>>106498877
Based

>>106498829
>https://github.com/futo-org/grayjay-android
Why do I need an account to see the docs

>>106496251 (OP)
Grayjay is proprietary. Ironic how angry OP is at FOSS but in reality it is AGAIN closed non-free proprietary by proprietary corporation that is the bad one.

>>106499475
The source is open.
You don't understand the difference with that is license.
Retard.

Foss is much worse

>>106496251 (OP)
It does, your brain doesn't lmao.

>>106499458
why did you change the link from gitlab to github?

>>106499538
I don't remember why desu.

>>106499490
Source is not open. You cannon reproduce the binaries from that. You end up getting different binaries for different software with different features. How difficult this is to understand. It is like proprietary Brave that doesn't have reproducible binaries and the source code is 100% unrelated. These applications are proprietary, impossible to compile to get same binaries, license is proprietary, and only open source is allowed in official default repository of F-Droid and even that doesn't accept the Grayjay or Brave BECAUSE THEY ARE PROPRIETARY. Stfu if you don't understand what proprietary software means. IT MEANS YOU CANNOT MODIFY OR COMPILE IT AND IT HAS PROPRIETARY LICENSE.

>>106499475
It's open source, the source was just linked above.
Do you not know what proprietary is?
You can take the source, and change it in any way you want for yourself. You can learn from it as well. That is open source and the power of it.

>>106499549
If it is impossible to compile source code into binaries, it is not open source. It ends up as different application with different features. It is not reproducible so it is proprietary. Also the license is proprietary. If proprietary software has "source available" proprietary license and doesn't even have reproducible binaries, then it is proprietary.

>>106499565
that's just not reproducible binary, nothing to do with a source of a project.
Some languages even have issues doing this.

>>106499573
Software is open source only if it meets all OSI criteria, allows unrestricted modification/redistribution, and enables reproducible binaries for verification (per community standards like F-Droid). Grayjay violates OSI criteria with its proprietary license, restricts modification/distribution, and lacks reproducible binaries (resulting in different, unverifiable software). Therefore, Grayjay is proprietary software. It's controlled by a proprietary corporation (FUTO) that enforces restrictions.

You keep repeating how "You can take the source" (no you can't because the actual Grayjay's source code is not available 1:1), "and change it in any way you want" (no you can't because proprietary corporation FUTO prevents you to do that), "You can learn from it as well" (impossible because the source code is not for the Grayjay, it is for some similar application that has different features) "That is open source" (false) "and the power of it." (it has zero power to be or do anything).

>>106499653
that's foss / floss

>>106498829
>>106498877
>>106499549
>You may use or modify the software only for non-commercial purposes such as personal use for research, experiment, and testing for the benefit of public knowledge, personal study, private entertainment, hobby projects, amateur pursuits, or religious observance, all without any anticipated commercial application.
>You may distribute the software or provide it to others only if you do so free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
>Notwithstanding the above, you may not remove or obscure any functionality in the software related to payment to the Licensor in any copy you distribute to others.
>You may not alter, remove, or obscure any licensing, copyright, or other notices of the Licensor in the software. Any use of the Licensor’s trademarks is subject to applicable law.
That is NOT open source, it is source available at best. Even the BSD or MIT cuck licences are way better than this crap.

Lmao at the retard not knowing the difference between open source and free as in freedom license

speaking of, I think this app is pretty cool https://github.com/crackededed/Xtra

>>106500473
Thanks, will try it out
I've been using PurpleTV but their website got nuked.
https://t.me/pubTwChat

>>106499547
You do realise I can fork GrayJay right? The only limitations are SourceFirst limitations. Please tell me you read the actual license before going schizo

>>106499653
You do realise the OSI does not hold a trademark on what open source is right? There is no single definition of what open source is. The OSI are corpo backed and expert solely to pretend that cuck licenses have a reason to exist and to antagonize Free Software.

>>106500091
Imagine defending cuck licenses

sourcefirst.com

>>106500091
lol

>>106496251 (OP)
It's not the applications fault, youtube website simply fails randomly, especially youtube rss

>>106496251 (OP)
Nobody fucking told you things like Grayjay should just work, especially when companies such as YouTube making sure it doesn't

>>106500965
>>106500963
My other YouTube clients do work though.
GrayJay has never worked properly

>>106498877
Open source isn't a term that just means source available, it's descriptor for a license that follows specific criteria as specified by the open source initiative. Source First License 1.1 is not an open source license.

>>106500969
In other applications they either simply dont report when there is a youtube error or they use another youtube endpoint that doesn't fail. It's still an issue with youtube itself. Youtube does it best to prevent third party applications from working properly, even when using official endpoints.

>>106496251 (OP)
what do you expect when the company is named futa

>>106500979
That's where you're wrong retard.

Which is why people like Stallman never mention open source alone to mean FOSS
you forget the F retard.
Free as in freedom (license)

>>106500979
wrong

>>106500704
>Imagine defending cuck licenses
Source first licence is more cucked than MIT or BSD. You cannot use the software in commercial applications, you cannot sell the software, if you fork it you cannot remove features that pays the original author, you cannot change the licence.
MIT, BSD, GPL, and many other open source licences do allow you to do all of that.
You make a fork, add features, fix bugs, improve performance... and the original author is the one getting paid, not you. You can't be more cucked than that.

>sourcefirst.com
>No product or software that is source first can include ads or other malware within it. By this we don’t mean that a product can’t include a simple shout out to another project within it, that is totally fine. However, projects should not explicitly have paid advertisements or other advertising features embedded within them.
>Privacy is a primary issue in the current software landscape and there are many open source projects which overtly violate users’ privacy. Any software that contains telemetry must have a mechanism for opting into said telemetry. We fundamentally reject all “the user is the product” software business models.
Not part of the licence, so this cannot be enforced.

>>106496251 (OP)
try updating the app once in a while