Thread 106503884

Why is this allowed?

>>106503884 (OP)
googling that returned no hits. what is it?

>>106503989
the github got removed for it recently
it was https://github.com/alex-suspicious/UnsafeYTools

>>106503884 (OP)
what did it do use words fren

>>106504031
found a copy here
https://github.com/JTarmagedon/unsafeyt
looks cool

>>106503884 (OP)
>unsafe

Does it put users at risk? The name sounds like it does.

>>106504058
I downloaded the ZIP, but attempting to install it to my browser failed. Also tried renaming the .zip to .xpi. Weird.

A few months ago when the project was first posted on some other board (nsfw board? can't remember) I reported the project to YouTube. Included the links and explanation of how it worked. I wonder if that has something to do with it + all the zoo shit getting posted onto YouTube recently using the project.

I don't not regret shit. I fucking hate what people do to cool projects like these so I just said "fuck it".

>>106504076
>Does it put users at risk?
Probably more like ad providers and.

>>106504100
>I don't not regret shit.
* do not.

Pic somewhat related. I hate you all.

>>106504100
Is that some kind of a weird fish smoked?

You all will HANG.

>>106504120
>Is that some kind of a weird fish smoked?

>>106504134
hey i was in that /ck/ thread too

>>106504134
Still unsure what species that belonged to

>>106504058
>>106504097

>>106504100
Kill yourself.

>>106504100
thats so tuff
omg i feel so much safer

>>106504174
>Kill yourself.
The source code is still in circulation anyways. You can fix it up yourself.

>>106504176
ts tuff asl

>>106504192
zoo stuff is still up
try harder i guess
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Qve9bFTsE

It's allowed because you mocked stallman

>>106504146
probably halibut based on only one piece because its expensive. if it was cod there'd be 10 pieces
>t. fish and chips enjoyer

>>106504156
It says in the instructions to unpack the zip file.

>>106504382
Yes, I tried that as well, however there was no option to "load it as an unpacked extension."

This is too damn funny. Unreal to me that people get their kicks off of uploading porn to YouTube. Do they jerk off to the video player?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktwIcxdsNuU

>>106504461
Oh okay, it works in Chromium, which has that option.

>>106504496
its not just shoot them in the face and move on

I assume its just actual malware that leaks private information to israel
why would anyone try to delete it from githud/play store otherwise

>>106504580
One youtube comment said the extension does dox people. Not sure if true. Most of the encrypted videos are just internet cartoon trash AI porn.

>>106504641
I don't see anything in the source that would suggest that this is possible. It reaches out to jsdelivr for some css, but thats about it.

>>106505075
>It reaches out to jsdelivr for some css
cdns are massive attack vectors silly
thats why google basically disincentivized their use entirely
it used to be
>load the resource from a CDN so every user can have it from their cache!!!!!!!!
now its rewarded if you do this instead
>deliver it yourself from your server!!!!!
>more secure, less network request authing!!!!!!!

>>106505107
In this particular case what could the CSS do?

>>106505324
well a pdf file can make a web request in the background most people dont know that. basically anything youre not controlling the source of is a vulnerability. letting anyone serve some resource you can just as easily host yourself is needless
even css can be an attack vector if a browser bug is hit with a 0day
>things people never share publicly unless paid millions of dollars, which then gets massively exploited

>>106505324
CSS has been used in creative ways in the past, among which credit card theft by forcing the use of an on-demand download web font which partitioned each digit into a separate font file.
User types digit, they start a web request to an attacker controlled server for a font file indicating they typed a 1. A few milliseconds later, they start a request for a 2. etc.

>>106504134
I thought that was one of those shredded arm steering wheel memes from the thumbnail

op confirmed pedo

>>106506959
erm no?

>>106503884 (OP)
>>106504031
>>106504058
what a retardation
the masses really are dumb

>>106506986
erm yes?

i got it working and holy shit is it overhyped dogshit. the videos are just furry trash. these basedteen retards are seething over nothing

>>106506467
I have no idea what this thread is about but I'm with this anon.

>>106506467
>>106508438
Are you guys Indians?

>>106508438
have that thread then
https://warosu.org/ck/thread/21205612

>>106504140
ck best board

>>106504641
Thats why it wont work offline

What do the tokens do?

>>106503884 (OP)
It's unsafe, trust the mozila

>>106507506
I had never heard about this before, but considering this AI search engine reply, "the masses" don't know shit indeed:
>"Obfuscating" videos for YouTube does not refer to embedding hidden or encrypted information within the video files themselves (as digital obfuscation would be erased by YouTube's reencoding process), but rather to techniques that interfere with or manipulate YouTube's recommendation and profiling algorithms by altering the history of watched videos.
>In practice, this means injecting artificial or random video watches into the user's watch history alongside real activity. These added watches serve to confuse YouTube's recommendation engine and make it harder for the platform to infer the genuine interests, habits, or identity of the user. The obfuscated data is not inside the video itself—the "obfuscation" operates at the level of usage analytics and behavior tracking, not video file encoding.

>>106509243
What if the video is unlisted?

fuck. does. it. do.
send screencap

>>106509280
https://web.archive.org/web/20250719135218/https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/unsafeyt/

I can see why YouTube would hate it.
And Mozilla probably banned it over IP infringement and other illegal use. Going by the posts in this thread probably zoophilia?

why do only furries use this shit

>>106509309
seriously I checked youtube and it was 100% furry porn. fucking kill yourselves.

>>106508535
How would saying a photo looks like a photo make me subhuman?

>>106509316
Want me to upload some non-furfag/zoo porn? I'm bored.

>>106503884 (OP)
What, you using a given browser of your own free will?

so how do i use it

>>106510180
I am trying to figure that out right now.

>>106510075
Here goes nothing:
[AmateurAllure] Amateur Allure Introduces Becky Summer, Petite Blonde Loves Giving Head, Fucking and Swallowing Cum (2025.03.21) [1080p]
https://youtu.be/4yHv0mpAbpM

Maybe if I can fix it to work with hardware encoding using ffmpeg to speed it up I'll do more later. This shit isn't really set up to suit my needs.

>>106510665
I posted this and it kinda worked

(Token QLKFOKCDXEXTF07BPT96)

But the audio is completely fucked. Maybe I need to spend more time figuring out how to make it work correctly.

Why the hell would you bother with this shit over just going to a porn site?

>>106510895
If it could actually be done effectively we could upload lots of full length copyrighted scenes there. That would be fun.

>>106510922
It's just gonna be porn (probably including pizza) and gore/torture/other illegal disturbing shit. No thanks.

>>106504100
why ruin it for everyone? now i have to get my toddler porn from the source (getting forum invites from respected members is a pain in the ass).

I'm still trying to figure out what the fuck this all is. Is this some bizarre YouTube DRM using some WebGL shader?

>>106510971
this does not concern you, normie, move along

>>106503884 (OP)
>Pretend jews are ok
>Pretend fags are ok
>They turn everything to shit
woweez, who coulda seen that one coming

>>106510952
If the quality was good enough it could be used for other things. No reason why I couldn't upload movies or TV shows. It's easier to find disturbing content than it is copyrighted content. Even on YouTube.

>>106510971
Ok I see, it's obfuscation for illegal shit. kekw.

>>106510952
Any unmoderated platform ends up with pizza and gore.
There is no getting around it.

Best you can hope for is clearly marked off sections and a community willing to adhere to it, so you don't have to see what you don't want to see.
But there will always be sick fucks who get off from posting pizza and gore in SFW sections just because they know people don't like it.

>>106504100
>I reported the project to YouTube
Hope you used a burner email
If there is some data leak you may be known as the snitch who browses 4chan

>>106503884 (OP)
It's easy to convert to a userscript, I did a poc easily to work in "full page" videos but I'm too lazy to keep working on it.
The "encrypt tool"'s code fucking sucks, tho. Didn't get it to work.
Would be great to have a userscript version, you could probably upload to atf's git with no problem. I do not trust the original creator, they want to create a report system and created a patreon. This isn't a tool, the idea behind is more important. Do not use the extension.
>>106508698
It modifies the offset texture.

>>106511184
I've been using AI to modify the tool. It's fairly straightforward just implemented in a way that's really fucking dumb. I got it to work headless which I need because I don't want to be encoding videos with libx264 on my laptop. Maybe I should try using quicksync on here to do it but I feel like I wasted too much time on this already.

Any artifact bajs here? We could try this to get around the recent jannie infestation

>>106511208
My vibe coding has resulted in a version that isn't total dogshit. Still a long way to go.

>>106504100
snitches get stitches

>>106504580
>Israel
Close. The main dev worked with sharty /raid/ to add a cookie stealer and IP grabber onto the extension, among other things.

>>106512351
I don't see anything suspicious on the unpacked browser extension. Looks completely clean.

Only chrome version works. Wheres firefox archive?

>>106510075
Post your favorite /gif/ webms on shorts

>>106512468
You can check the threads on there yourself if you want to, although the compromised version was only available for less than a day until it got baleeted. They still got at least a few hundred IPs, usernames and cookie scrapes.

>>106512568
It might be worth it to release a fork with the known clean files. Since the code is so shitty as it is a lot of work could be done to make it more usable.

>>106512677
What I find striking is that the author used to promote himself on /b/ and /h/ and wanted to use it specifically to upload porn.
Faggot probably did it for attention and to save his own ass.

This shit will get blocked at the Youtube level sooner or later anyway.
They actively go after obfuscators and eventually reverse engineer the pattern in a predictable way to block it.
Just like how they blocked people putting picture frames around copyrighted content to get around censors and slightly alter the audio pitch / speed.

OY VEY TAKE THIS DOWN IMMEDIATELY!

lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ0pBedo7rE
I actually got the audio to work this time

>>106515735
human porn is soo unattractive
idk why
furry porn on top

How do I decode these videos?