← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106522992

20 posts 10 images /g/
Anonymous No.106522992 [Report] >>106523194 >>106523536 >>106523561 >>106524034 >>106524142
So, what exactly are the hardware security features that only Google Pixels have? And how come they survived the transition from Qualcomm SoCs to Google Tensor?
Anonymous No.106523014 [Report] >>106523053
this is not the grapheneos faq
Anonymous No.106523053 [Report]
>>106523014
I read the FAQ, didn't answer my question. It says what features they need, not which ones other phones lack (and half of them are standard for ARMv9 chips)
Anonymous No.106523149 [Report]
I think the main thing is that Pixels are one of the few mainstream phones that (for now) allow you to install a custom ROM and relock the bootloader. It all comes down to hardware attestation:
https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide

The world GrapheneOS wants to live in is one where they deploy a ROM which is verified to be secure and to not provide root to the users so that app developers can be confident that users aren't spoofing their location in Pokemon go or taking screenshots of Snapchats or whatever they're worried about. The compromise is that even without root GrapheneOS does return much more control to the user via sandboxing etc. We don't live in this world though; currently any device attestation is inexorably linked to Google.

Notably GrapheneOS isn't advocating for the attitude that "this is the user's device, they should have root and be able to do whatever the fuck they want", they're merely saying that because they've gone to all this work to make their ROM secure it should be considered as such by app developers.
Anonymous No.106523163 [Report]
OP confirmed illiterate retard.
Anonymous No.106523194 [Report] >>106523389
>>106522992 (OP)
>de-Googled Android OS
>only runs on Google hardware
Anonymous No.106523237 [Report]
BRAAAAAAAP
Anonymous No.106523389 [Report]
>>106523194
They used to support a couple of other phones until they were paid off.
Anonymous No.106523525 [Report] >>106524278
>unlockable bootloader
leaves only Pixel, Sony and Fairphone
>relockable bootloader
leaves only Pixel and Fairphone
>secure element so you can't just spam all possible PIN codes to unlock
leaves only Pixel
Anonymous No.106523536 [Report]
>>106522992 (OP)
>how come they survived the transition
just wait.
but serious, its because they provided device trees and driver source, which they wont do anymore for pixel 10
Anonymous No.106523561 [Report] >>106523836 >>106523950
>>106522992 (OP)
LMAO look at this! Daniel Micay has created an alt account! Look at his writing style and his obsession with fighting "misinformation"! It is him!

https://social.tchncs.de/@tranquil_cassowary@infosec.exchange
Anonymous No.106523607 [Report]
plasma mobile seems promising
Anonymous No.106523836 [Report] >>106524175
>>106523561

Oh look a faggot who glows in the dark trying to vilify an autistic jewish kid who does nothing but codes and dunks on retards online.

Why you so mad at the kike for? Because he's helping society while you are jerking your tiny penis off all day?

Love how everyone calls strcat schizo but he is legitimately being gangstalked online by a bunch of glowie faggots. That's how you know he does good work and you can trust GrapheneOS.

Fuck the feds, fuck the glowies.
Anonymous No.106523950 [Report]
>>106523561
>Account created: 20. Aug. 2025

It must be him.
Anonymous No.106524034 [Report] >>106524242
>>106522992 (OP)
Anonymous No.106524142 [Report]
>>106522992 (OP)
cpu backdoors kek
Anonymous No.106524175 [Report]
>>106523836
Anonymous No.106524242 [Report]
>>106524034
But the Titan M2 was only introduced with the Pixel 6 and GrapheneOS was running on the Pixel 4. Samsung has the comparable Knox chip as well.
Anonymous No.106524278 [Report] >>106524351
>>106523525
why are smartphone companies so shit?
Anonymous No.106524351 [Report]
>>106524278
If it aint broke (the buisness model) dont fix it