Thread 106527480

>90% of the images on google images
>can't upload a photo to 4chan half the time as a result

>>106527480 (OP)
you're surprised a proprietary format invented by indians at google is used by google and no one else wants to touch it?
>but but it's open source
yeah cool bro show me all the non-google implementations

>>106527480 (OP)
>download a jpg
>look inside
>webp

>download a jpg
>look inside
>avif

>download a jpg
>look inside
>HEIC

Why?

>>106527497
>and no one else
Most of the internet is webp now. All of my apps and websites support webp EXCEPT for 4chan, which has supported webm for over a decade but still doesn't support webp's, which are literal one-frame webm's.

>>106527497
>yeah cool bro show me all the non-google implementations
an open source software doesn't become proprietary because it isn't popular, if you just stop trying to force your retarded inaccurate definition of "proprietary format" then maybe your criticism would carry weight.

>>106527480 (OP)
bro are you admitting to saving a webp?

I convert all my images to webp to keep them safe from 4chan hackers

>>106527480 (OP)
What's stopping Hiro from adding WebP support to 4chan?

>>106527630
apathy
They removed the suggestions option from feedback

>>106527565
are you low iq or just pretending? all those projects are just importing google's implementation of their shitty jeetslop format
keep sucking bigcorp dick

>>106527673
>all those projects are just importing google's implementation
so you admit it isn't proprietary.

>>106527542
Same reason webshitters started labelling webm and mp4 files as "gift".
They are just that restarted.
> image file?
> issa jpeg
> moving images?
> issa gif

>>106527560
>>106527630
Hiroshima Nagasaki didn't buy 4chan to improve it
the hack a few months ago was because parts of the software stack had known vulns for years and hadn't been updated; they're not even doing basic maintenance

>>106527480 (OP)
Use a 4chan application like Chance that converts it for you.

dwebp input.webp -o output.png

>>106527480 (OP)
this can help
cloudconvert.com/webp-to-jpg

>>106528222
>webp to jpg
dwebp input.webp -o output.png
cjpegli output.png output.jpg

>>106527480 (OP)
NEVER
>NEVER
NEVER
>NEVER

USE WEBP

>>106528255
Preach. Fuck WebP

>>106528255
>>106528420
No...

>>106528222
>transparent jpg
good luck

>>106527480 (OP)
WeaboPee is a dead format.
Move along, AVIF & JPEG-XL are the hot new things you should be worried about.
By the way, tell your handler, that his employers browser doesn't even support JPEG-XL and worry about that instead of paying pajeets to astroturf basket weaving forums with exploitable software propaganda.

Who cares? I want APNG support

>>106528561
Lossless AVIF is a meme and compresses worse than lossless WebP, for grayscale images like manga it's even much worse than PNG. JPEG-XL isn't supported by browsers yet. So lossless WebP is currently the best option for lossless images on the web.
Also people converting some 40kB lossy WebP to an 800kB PNG is just a waste of bandwidth.

>>106528721
>JPEG-XL isn't supported by browsers yet.
Wrong. Even fucking Safari supports it, and it can be enabled in Firefox Nightly since version 90.
The only browser missing support is the one owned by Google. Very interesting.
Better luck next time, but you might need better propaganda materials.

>>106528822
>Even fucking Safari supports it
Safari is the ONLY widely used browser that currently supports it.
>it can be enabled in Firefox Nightly
Buggy, partial experimental support only available in the experimental release that's not even enabled by default and has to be explicitly enabled by the user isn't real support.
>The only browser missing support is the one owned by Google
Which also happens to be the one with the biggest market share by far.
>muh propaganda
I'm just stating the facts. JPEG-XL is great and I wish adoption would go smoother and browsers would support it already, but that just isn't the case yet.