>>106552586
the thing about the list itself though which ive always found extremely fascinating is the fact that they were:
>very highly connected and bankrolled
>"influencers" in many different spheres; politics, technology, science
>mossad agents capable of being astroturfed everywhere and anywhere, due to power of press
with that in mind, you have created a honey pot. and what this means is, everyone wants to dip into the honey pot, and eventually, everyone will. because you've created a very glamorous image of these powerful, "helpful" people.
not every single person that has been or got involved with this honey pot can be properly accused of anything.
and thats how the entire thing operated. they were influencers who would meet innovative scientists and say
>we like nerds, want some money
was that nerd a pedophile? no probably not. can we condemn him now because he has a photo beside jeff epstein his tech investor, yes?