Thread 106556310

>>106556310 (OP)
Intel is done.

>>106556508
2 more weeks

intelaviv never fails to hit new lows

>>106556310 (OP)
just one more naming scheme change and we will be in the green again

>>106556310 (OP)
Are they planning to get an OEM to start up LGA1200 mb production again?
there is only 1 (one) affordable LGA1200 board available new and it is probably old stock

>>106556310 (OP)
Did we time leaped back to 2020?

>>106557620
Not only that, LGA1200 coolers would need to be produced again, not that they aren't widely available, but a lot of the non-tower options (stuff like the arctic alpine 12 line) are discontinued.

how over is it for intel ?

>>106560858
Pentium 4 era looks good in comparison.

>>106556310 (OP)
Why are you stupid autist surprised about this? It is well know fact semiconductor industry that when you release a new product (say a new gen), you don't stop production immediately; instead, you keep selling it at a discount, or in third world shitholes. Everyone does this: Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, Mediatek, even Apple does it (where do you think Best Buy gets those M1s at $600?)
Now, another fact that you didn't know... Intel has kept producing i5 10400s for a very long time

>>106561240
I forgot to add this pic from AliExpress. You can see on the numbers printed, the first number after the letter is the year of production, so X5 means produced in 2025.
Something I find funny about this: if AMD does this sort of refresh, it is called "platform longevity"; if Intel does it, it is a turd that is not worth buying.

>>106561240
the 10400 is still a great CPU, but trying to sell it as a rebranded Core i5 110 for 200 is to much, the 10400 is like 150 by now.

>>106557620
>>106560482
Nope, they are just going to shove the chips into an adapter board, like they did with skylake dies when x299 just released. There was a huge shitstorm about Intel releasing these shitty 20 pcie lane cpus on the HEDT platform.

>>106556587
They would be done if they didn't receive socialism to save the dead company.

>>106561423
I agree that the renaming is dumb af, but I can find 10400s on AliExpress at $80.
Also, ignore that fake MSRP, it is there so that bulk buy contracts get a 'better' deal. I can bet you that those chips are OEM/huge orders only.

>>106561423
forget the 10400, the 12400 is below $150

>>106556310 (OP)
Has not its GPU support been discontinued?

By the way:
https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/2025/intel-is-losing-its-second-xeon-chief-architect-in-eight-months

>>106556310 (OP)
"They are not buying it!"... "Change the SKU and relaunch! That will fool them!"

>>106556938
How else will you trick the goyim into buying your 5 year old trash?

>>106561478
>the 12400
Isn't this the last cpu before estrogen cores?

>>106556310 (OP)
10th gen never obsolete

>>106561584
>how else
that would imply it's working

>>106556587
>has been shedding assets and personnel for well over a decade now
>one step away from getting communism'd by the us govt
>t-they're w-winning g-guys!
How much Intel stock did you buy retard?