Thread 106560043

Rust in windows

>>106560043 (OP)
Don't care. I'm on mac + linux + windows vm that occasionally bricks itself

“I’d actually, even prior to that tweet, told our teams we should stop new projects in C and C++ and start with Rust if we can’t tolerate a garbage-collected language,” he said during his RustConf keynote.

Now, as deputy CISO of Azure (in addition to CTO), he can make it official: “There’s just too much risk in adopting or creating new C++, you will not do it.”

>“There’s just too much risk in adopting or creating new C++, you will not do it.”

>>106560080
sounds jewish

Based? Now make it first class in Visual Studio and ship rustc and shit through it so my shitty corporate antivirus won't slow down my rust builds. For some reason the retards at my work don't scan visual studio shit. idk why.

>>106560043 (OP)
I imagine Microsoft's old C++ code is the most jeeted dogshit ever so Rust would be an objective improvement.

>>106560103
you think the code was more indian back when they employed white men and not indians?

>>106560110
Jeeted is like Judaic and gay. It's just a slur anon... A whitoid can behave like all of those things.

>>106560133
so you think that jeets who vibe code Rust (small reminder that the majority of Rust code is generated) will produce higher quality than a white man did over ten years ago before DEI was even a thing?

>>106560133
ah, like you are now, indian, jewish and gay at the same time. i see.

>>106560043 (OP)
>C and C++ crash spectaculary
>we want to avoid that with Rust
>once we had a bug in Rust and it caused Bluescreen, which was amazing, because it wouldn't have caused a Bluescreen in C, Bluescreens are deterministic and good, it is what actually mattery
This text is AI written. No human being is capable of writing something like this and don't sport the obvious contradiction happening just two sentences apart

>>106560043 (OP)
it's all marketing trying to bank on rust's good name and success (yes, good name and success).
if you actually read their blog post, you will find out that all they did was publish raw ffi unsafe bindings (just a small step beyond merely running bindgen). and in the blog itself shared ONE SINGLE SAMPLE example of what a rather trivial safe wrapper for ONE SINGLE structure may look like.. in the future.
R4L (rust for linux) literally has thousands of safe wrappers and specialized APIs ranging from trivial to elaborate, yet they won't be marketing it as "Rust as a first class citizen" anytime soon, because they respect the intelligence of their target audience who didn't like microshit pre ai+jeetification, let alone give a fuck post ai+jeetification.

C++ is pretty safe if you write pure functions and use immutable data structures, which are pretty easy things to do.

>>106560043 (OP)
Good

Rust will win because if AI-generated Rust code compiles it's more likely to be correct than C++

>>106561090
>power bill skyrockets since the pajeets have to prompt 50 times more often to get a hello world

>>106560043 (OP)
old news. Microsoft talked about using Rust like 4 years ago or so

>>106560217
It's not contradictory. They want a crash dump, not an empty stack trace.

Perhaps, we can just not write code so shit that it's "leaking privilege escalation bugs monthly", maybe, just maybe, this is a skill issue

>>106561249
You're right but this argument is also retarded, the reason the "new" rust version is safer and faster is because they took all their lessons from the mistakes with the C++ version and applied it to the new software. You can't write something safe and right when you do it the first time, so while it is a skill issue it's also unavoidable for majority of projects.

>>106560080
>start with Rust if we can't tolerate a garbage-collected language
Based. C# should be the default, Rust is if you need more speed.