Thread 106561243

>>106560169
>>>In fact you couldn't even understand my own words
>>I understood them fine. You are wrong.
>>You claim that Devarim 22 verse 28 allows the father to prevent the rapist from keeping the girl. It does not.
>You have now changed your assertion. You said
Wrong. You are in favor of the girl's will being enacted.
Weather her will is enacted through the tool that is the father; or directly; it is the same in it's essential terms.
>>Says nothing about "father can reject", nor "girl want's or doesn't want"
>But I never said that the girl can reject it. I said the father can reject it for her. Which is true.
Distinction without a difference, as you indicated that "if the girl doesn't like the rapist man, the father will reject this"
(this is not a quote from your exact words: but from your heart: what you ment by those words).

> The correct word for that would be "קח" as in 24 5. "תפש" implies nothing as to being legally married.
There is no "legal marraige" in the first 5 books of YHWH's law.
There is only man, woman, girl. The man is the ba'al, and the adoni. The woman and the girl are simply women and girls.
Ruled over by a ba'al.

> That he marries her is a punishment to him, it is not a requirement on the father.
Yes it is a requirement.
You have added that "it is a punishment".
It is not a punishment. YOU have added that.

>Just like in a general case of stealing, the original owner has a right to ask for it back instead of being compensated financially.
Wrong; that is not in the text and is something you are adding.
The text says the girl becomes the woman of the man.
He shall not send her away because he raped her.
There was no contract made; just fait accompli.
He made his choice already.
He is now the Ba'al of the girl child, and pays the 50 pieces of silver.

>>106561243 (OP)
Technology?

Key Characteristics

Irreversible Outcome:

The action itself creates a new, often permanent, reality that cannot be easily undone.
Strategic Advantage:
It is a tactic used to gain an advantage by making it difficult for an adversary to retaliate or counter the action.
Disputed Territory:
States often use military force to seize disputed territory, hoping that the fait accompli will avoid a larger war.
"Accomplished Fact":
The literal meaning of the French phrase is an "accomplished fact," highlighting that the event has already occurred.

Historical Examples

Louisiana Purchase (1803):

President Jefferson pressed forward with the purchase, effectively creating a new, expanded United States before constitutional objections could halt the process.
Suez Canal Construction:
Ferdinand de Lesseps' decisive action to build the canal, despite opposition, made its completion a fait accompli, leading to worldwide marvel.
South China Sea (Recent):
China's assertive actions to establish control over parts of the South China Sea can be seen as a series of limited faits accomplis, or "salami tactics," to expand influence incrementally.

Modern Application

Gray Zone Conflict:

The fait accompli is a common method for states to pursue revisionist agendas in the "gray zone" of conflict, which involves actions short of open warfare.
Deterrence:
Understanding the tactic is crucial for deterrence efforts, as states must deter limited land grabs and territorial seizures that might otherwise lead to conflict.

To recap: /g/ christian faggot, essentially argues (in construction) that Devarim 22 verse 28 is abrogated

"Because"
"some word indicates this is not a legal marraige!"

The counterpoint is:
That there is NO "legal marraige" in YHWH's law.

There is simply man, woman, girl, ba'al, adoni.
The man is the ba'al, the adoni.
The women and girls are simply women and girls with a ba'al.

White people are fags.

In ancient israelite society you got married the first time you had sex with a woman, the act of consummation is the act of marrying someone. Having sex with a woman created an obligation to provide her the rights of a married woman. Many traditional societies are like this

>>106561243 (OP)
Shut up brown jew I told you already that little girls are for whites, go away with you brown kikery. This is a techloliogy board.

>>106561243 (OP)
“They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?” (Matthew 19:7)