>>106564146 (OP)
even just checking wikipedia and not doing real research
>this dude was born in 1926
>page created in 2007
>most recent edits are an edit war over "father of fibre optics" moniker full of jeet usernames
then if you go to the page for fibre optics itself
>Daniel Colladon and Jacques Babinet first demonstrated the guiding of light by refraction, the principle that makes fiber optics possible, in Paris in the early 1840s.
>In the late 19th century, a team of Viennese doctors guided light through bent glass rods to illuminate body cavities.[18] Practical applications such as close internal illumination during dentistry followed, early in the twentieth century. Image transmission through tubes was demonstrated independently by the radio experimenter Clarence Hansell and the television pioneer John Logie Baird in the 1920s. In the 1930s, Heinrich Lamm showed that one could transmit images through a bundle of unclad optical fibers and used it for internal medical examinations, but his work was largely forgotten.[15][19]
and the main mention of this jeet is that he just came up with the term "fibre optics" instead of whatever it was called before, and was part of a larger american research team aping the work of the dutch.
they dont even try to hide their psyopping
>>106565398
i'll grant that in that era the average westernized jeet was probably some moderately based sikh dude who could at least read or write (and this was the case in most of the west before around 2023) but TJD and attributing all the work of fibre optics existing to one singular jeet (who is being brownwashed to be a apiotic casteoid) is an obvious psyop. and apparently even this dude gave himself an award. pathetic
