← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106593975

17 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.106593975 >>106594014 >>106594027 >>106594070 >>106594330 >>106596410 >>106596976 >>106597007
Why did the tech industry abandon the isometric icon aesthetic when it was objectively the best looking aesthetic they've ever come up with?
Anonymous No.106593998
Isometric graphics were pretty based overall. Gave you all of the depth you needed in a very tiny performant package.
Anonymous No.106594014
>>106593975 (OP)
Because once Silicon Valley discovered minimalism, they realized it was easier to ship bland rectangles than hire actual artists.
Anonymous No.106594022 >>106594040 >>106594054
It’s just noisy and visually inconsistent, I still think it looks neat but designing thousands of icons around it sounds like a pain in the ass. It’s not suitable for smaller screens either and graphic designers would much rather use a unified design language across multiple platforms. This is why something like numix or tela works better than breeze.
Anonymous No.106594027
>>106593975 (OP)
computer monitor resolutions got bigger
Anonymous No.106594040 >>106594359
>>106594022
>visually inconsistent
Variance is healthy for your brain, not to mention it makes things more identifiable, which is the whole point of having graphics.
Anonymous No.106594054 >>106595902
>>106594022
>designing thousands of icons around it sounds like a pain in the ass
Why do tech companies employ "designers" that they pay $300k a year then? Your job should be a pain in the ass if you're being paid such an obscene amount of money.
Anonymous No.106594070
>>106593975 (OP)
>objectively
You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means
Anonymous No.106594330
>>106593975 (OP)
Looks like a toy.
Anonymous No.106594359
>>106594040

What do you mean anon? McKinsey assured us this was peak minimalist icon design
Anonymous No.106595902
>>106594054
Well, most icon packs are made for free by volunteers.
Anonymous No.106596410
>>106593975 (OP)
because as screen resolutions got bigger, pixel art went out of style. simple as that
Anonymous No.106596976
>>106593975 (OP)
I'm glad Be Inc. died because I didn't have to suffer watching them become woke 25 years later.
Anonymous No.106597007 >>106597080
>>106593975 (OP)
Who else used it other than BeOS, though?
Anonymous No.106597076
OP, sorry but some styles aren't timeless. Windows XP is timeless unlike this crap.
Anonymous No.106597080 >>106597596
>>106597007
IRIX.
Anonymous No.106597596
>>106597080
https://docs.maxxinteractive.com/books/misc/page/photo-gallery