>>106614314
No, homosexuality is far worse. Here, a true Christian man speaking about it:
>“Arthur’s the name, is it?” asked Uther, still wondering at the age of his son. Then suddenly frowning he asked, “He is not a vile sodomite?”
>“Certainly not,” said Merlin. “He hath been reared in hardy Wales, far from the effeminacy of cities.”
>And though dying the king roared with coarse laughter. “Then he already doth tup fat ewes, Merlin. I too was reared rustically.”
>But Merlin was humorless as to the carnal appetites, being himself a stranger to them. “Assuredly, Sire,” said he, “Arthur is pure in that regard and in all others.”
>“Then he’s no son of mine,” said Uther in disgust. “Nor, me-thinks, a suitable king for the robust British.” And he made a feeble effort to rise from the litter. “Perhaps I shall not die now and leave my country a trunk without a head.” But he lacked in the strength for further movement and he fell back groaning most bitterly. “There is no man who doth not lust for something,” said he. “If not for females, then for his own kind. ’Tis the prime function of a man to use his prick, and a king is the quintessence of manliness and a model to the masculine orders beneath him. Swyving one’s own sisters, as do the monarchs of bawdy Egypt, though a most unnatural practice, is not so heinous a crime as having at a boy. O cruel destiny, that a sod should succeed me!”
