>>106636871
The biggest reason for butthurt about wikipedia is their official policy of caring about Verifiability and not Truth. Some clusters of viewpoints, regardless of their veracity, tend to be espoused by low-quality, unreliable sources.
So when the kikes find out that they're not allowed to cite the ADL on the topic of Israel, they rage. When conservatives find out that they can't cite Stormfront or Twitter or Youtube on serious topics, they have a melty.
Famously even the founder of Wikipedia himself had tried for years to fix false information on his own page, but he was not allowed to do it because that would be 'original research' and he is not considered by wikipedia policy to be a reliable source about himself.
Then kiwi website was accused of causing someone to commit suicide, the wikipedia article was never updated with the fact that the person isn't even dead. According to the consensus of reliable sources that person IS dead, and so Wikipedia must act as if they are dead.
Thus Wikipedia can be slow to update or even include false information, which low IQ netizens interpret as Wikipedia endorsing those things as true or pushing some narrative or whatever.
