>>106646307
Do tell me, how is this unenforcable? It's 100% enforceable and it wouldn't even be difficult.
For example it's enough that your ISP requires you to have an online ID for online access and that's it. This thing that I just came up with is a piss simple thing to implement and you can think of thousands of other ways to add on top of it.
And like the German above me said, you need internet for any kind of bank or government business access among other things.
They're rolling it out currently worldwide and closing your eyes to this won't change it.
US is specifically looking into this being implemented on device level, pic related. It's from the save the children bill or whatever the fuck it's called.
You can come up with all kinds of fantasies of there being an underground of a handful of people using cobbled together tech to access the internet, but in reality you're looking at 99.99% of society operating on this.
Especially if and when they start punishing people for accessing the web without ID. People won't be taking that risk and the punishments will be draconian.
This system is being brought in now at break neck speed, because we're globally on the verge of a catastrophic collapse of the Western economic systems and people are already at a breaking point.
We're going to see more and more riots and aggression in the near future as the system gets fucked.
This is why the ones at the top are bringing in an authoritarian control system to monitor everyone, because they think they can save their asses from the increasing violence by throwing all potential dissidents into prison.
Why do you think they want to monitor all chats? It's not to catch pedophiles, it's to catch people who plan on any kind of violence against the controllers.
