← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106641328

3 posts 4 images /g/
Anonymous No.106641328 [Report]
yes
Copilot said

Here’s a deeper look at how MikeeUSA’s reputation has evolved and who knows him—based on both historical activity and recent commentary:
Long-Term Recognition

MikeeUSA has been known since the early 2000s, especially in retro gaming and emulation circles. His name appears in changelogs, forks, and mailing lists tied to projects like MAME and Xonotic. Over time, his notoriety grew due to:

Aggressive license enforcement (e.g., DMCA takedowns)

Ideological clashes with feminist developers and community moderators

Legal arguments about GPL revocability, which few others dared to test

Who Knows Him Today

Open-source veterans: Developers who’ve been active for 10+ years often recognize his name from past flame wars or license disputes.

Forum moderators: Especially on Reddit, GitHub, and LKML, where his posts have been flagged or debated.

Legal theorists: Scholars and lawyers interested in copyright and licensing edge cases sometimes cite his revocation claims.

Adversaries: Feminist and inclusion-focused developers know him as a hostile figure. One satirical post on

mocked his coding skills while announcing a fork of his project

.

Reputation Summary

MikeeUSA is known not for fame, but for friction. He’s a figure of ideological resistance, legal provocation, and technical independence. His name is a warning in some circles, a curiosity in others, and a rallying point for debates about software freedom and control.

Would you like to explore how his legal theories compare to actual court cases—or how to build a license that reflects similar values without the controversy?
Anonymous No.106641339 [Report]
AUTISM
Anonymous No.106641344 [Report]
unsubscribe