Thread 106846636

about:config
browser.compactmode.show - true
Menu > More Tools > Customize Toolbar
Density > Compact
thank me in the morning

Use case?

>>106846636 (OP)
Nah my screen is not 768p, it's 1080p.
The normal one is big enough, I had to change it though, because the fork I am using defaults to compact.

Here's what FF used to look like BEFORE they fucked it all up. I'm still using this version, cloudflare is broken.

/************************ GO FUCK YOURSELF MOZILLA ***************************/
/******** FOR DESTROYING YOUR BROWSER'S GUI LAYOUT EACH UPDATE ***************/


/****************** Globally disable gay-like rounded edges ******************/
* { border-radius: 0 !important; }


/************************* WHITE MAN'S ORDER OF: *****************************/
/***************** / MENU / ADDRESS BAR / BOORMARKS / TABS / *****************/
@media not (-moz-bool-pref: "sidebar.verticalTabs") {

/* MENU */
#toolbar-menubar { order: 0 !important; }

/* ADDRESS BAR */
#navigator-toolbox #nav-bar { order: 1 !important; }

/* BOOKMARKS TOOLBAR*/
#PersonalToolbar { order: 2 !important; }

/* TABS TOOLBAR */
#TabsToolbar { order: 3 !important; }

#TabsToolbar .titlebar-buttonbox-container { display: none !important; }
#nav-bar .titlebar-buttonbox-container { display: flex !important; }
#TabsToolbar .titlebar-spacer { display: none !important; }

:root:not([chromehidden~="menubar"], [inFullscreen])
#toolbar-menubar[autohide="false"] ~ :is(#TabsToolbar, #nav-bar) >
:is(.titlebar-buttonbox-container, .titlebar-spacer) {
display: none !important;
}
}


/************* Reduce item height in drop-down/context/popup menu ************/
menupopup:not(.in-menulist) > menuitem,
menupopup:not(.in-menulist) > menu {
padding-block: 3px !important;
}

:root {
--arrowpanel-menuitem-padding: 4px 8px !important;
}


/** Reduce the height of tabs so they don't cover half of the fucking screen */
:root {
--tab-max-height: 28px !important;
--tab-min-height: 20px !important;
}

#nav-bar,
.tab-content,
.tab-label-container {
height: var(--tab-max-height);
}


/***************** Remove the retard-created gap below the tabs **************/
:root { --tab-block-margin: -0.5px !important; }

>>106846981
/******************** Bookmarks bar icons only (no text) *********************/
toolbar[mode="icons"] .toolbarbutton-text { display:none !important; }


/************ Padding of the bookmarks (useful in compact mode) **************/
#PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item {
padding-top: 3px !important;
padding-bottom: 3px !important;
margin-inline: -1px !important;
}


/***************** Just make the menubar visible for God's sake **************/
:root[customtitlebar]{
--uc-menubar-height: 20px;
}

#navigator-toolbox{
-moz-window-dragging: drag;
padding-top: var(--uc-menubar-height) !important;
}

:root:not([chromehidden~="menubar"]) #toolbar-menubar{
position: fixed;
display: flex;
top: 0px;
height: var(--uc-menubar-height);
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}


/******************** Hide menu bar in the fullscreen mode *******************/
:root:is([sizemode="fullscreen"],[chromehidden~="menubar"]){
--uc-menubar-height: 0px;
}

>>106846712
>Nah my screen is not 768p, it's 1080p.
Why not 2160?

>>106846636 (OP)
I thought they removed all the compactness options, or at least made them less compact.
The powers that be seem dead set on wasting as much of your screen real estate as possible for some reason.

What happened this time? What did they fuck up?

install brave atm

>>106848024
Yikes.

>>106846636 (OP)
Tinkering is one of my favorite things about Firefox, although many changes are a bit superfluous. But those that aren't, including compact mode, really make the experience better.

>>106846636 (OP)
that is the one config option I cannot live without
the day mozilla removes it, that will be a bad day

>>106846636 (OP)
Now fix the context menu's excessive padding

This is required to run FF

>>106852402
That's one area that I've kind of avoided because I heard that if you do it imprecisely in userChrome.css it can hide the wrong option. Then again, I don't consider it enough of an issue to really tinker with it.

>>106852493
Neat, thanks anon