>>106879210
>for example bitcoin solved the problem to (mostly) anonymously buy drugs or do crime online
I think you might need to look at that harder. What part of everyone holding an independant copy of the ledger tracking every transaction inherently lends itself to anonimity?
>maybe the problems that crypto will solve in the future just haven't appeared yet I don't know
The problem it does actually solve however is moving money without having to depend on the provably corrupt fiat systems.
>>106879314
That sounds a lot more like the effect of watching bitcoin rise and thinking: "I can do that" without understand what it is they are doing - or worse, understanding they offer nothing and doing it anyway.
>>106885878
>since fiat is much more stable because it takes a whole economic crisis and economy tanking to devalue dollar/euro
It's constantly devaluing. It's the only thing stable about it, you can be assured it'll be worth less tomorrow. Speculative bullshit like attempting to pretend it's a comodity aside, bitcoin only goes up. If you're thinking of a 'pop' in the bitcoin bubble, then what you'll actually be thinking of is this speculative bullshit just crumbled and the price re-adjusted to reality. Which if you look at as a graph over time, keeps going up.
>In order to devalue crypto you only need someone like drumpf or musk to blurt out some bullshit on twitter.
No, that adds in a layer of speculative bullshit as tw@s rush to pretend it's a commodity...
>crypto is basically a scam
Crypto, no. Some examples, without a doubt. Most in fact. But that isn't a "crypto problem" it's a "human greed" problem. There's a certain type of person that will sell a product they do not have to sell to pocket the money and run - is that a fault of the fictional product, or the person pretending they have it to sell?