>>106899061
I imagine a few explanations. First it's an actual attempt to kill unixes; but that makes me unsure about the corpo side of it (eg redhat).
The second is that wayland makes it PERFECT to replicate what happened between firefox and chromium. Firefox/KDE is more "liberal", GNOME is more dictating. Wayland creates incompatibility at display server level, because of the concept of extensions, and the fact that the core is basically useless. So we have a concentration between two sides. One will sound like the counter force to the dictating one, while the dictating one advances. Until the point that everyone depends on it, then the other can be slowly discarded.
OR the third and schizo scenario, they are actually retards and thought a kiosk display server with nothing done for security (we actually have a bigger attack surface in practice and your data passing through questionable [in terms of security] software like dbus) is good and secure.