Thread 106908265

How can people still insist that Framgen isnt the future? How else would we run games at 400+ FPS with good visuals?

How can people still insist that ULMB isnt the future? How else would we run games at 400+ FPS with good visuals?

How can people still insist that G-SYNC PULSAR isnt the future? How else would we run games at 400+ FPS with good visuals?

>>106908265 (OP)
People run games at high framerates to have lower latency. Adding fake frames between real frames makes the image more smooth but it does nothing for responsiveness.

maybe with enough fake frames you can finally approach the motion clarity of a crt running at 60hz

>>106908265 (OP)
>but it does nothing for responsiveness.
there's a point of diminishing returns
if you're generating from, say, 120~200fps it still feels responsive

How can people still insist that PhysX acceleration cards isnt the future? How else would we run games at 400+ FPS with good visuals

>>106908348
I have a PhysX SSD.
Windows, FX-8350, R9 270X (7870 @ 1100 MHz), NoVideo P106-090 for PhysX (GTX 1060 without display outputs and 1050 shader count)

>>106908265 (OP)
What does it matter when every single game released past 2006 is bad?

>400 FPS
why though

>>106908265 (OP)
1080p 60fps is my gold standard and I shall not stray from the light of God.

>>106908265 (OP)
god i love the karin sultan

>>106908265 (OP)
dlss, frame gen, and the gaytracing meme exist and are shilled heavily so devs can cut more corners and get their buggy shitheaps to market faster

that's it

it's not for you. it's for the publishers and their investors. the best trick nvidia ever played was to make you retards think any of this was for the consumer

>>106908265 (OP)
Framegen is cool if can already run the game at more than 100fps. If you don't it will add alot of input latency and artifacts. It's a nice feature to have but it is definitively not the future as you claim.

>>106908265 (OP)
If they didn't bloat games with gaytracing bullshit that never runs well, we wouldn't need hallucinated, artifacted garbage frames. Why are you so desperate and gleeful about eating shit?

>>106908346
You don't have a 400Hz monitor so what's your fucking point?

>>106909248
Wrong game

>>106909374
you're gonna make it someday anon, just get a better job

>>106908514
blur free

>>106909797
my crt does that just fine at 50hz

>>106909835
yea, but its flickery and looks worse

>>106908265 (OP)
>407W dumped into the room to play a 13 year old game at 1440p
Ew

>>106908265 (OP)
is that a generated frame or a real one?
>>106908340
you need real hz for that https://blurbusters.com/crt-simulation-in-a-gpu-shader-looks-better-than-bfi/