Thread 106958267

>WELL... you see... the cloud is more reliable with 99.999% uptime and is um... cheaper too because of ECONOMIES OF SCALE
How do retards still for this in 2025?

>>106958267 (OP)
something off about this fox

>>106958439
Her proprtions are that of a guy here.

>>106958267 (OP)
"The cloud" was the AI of early 2010s.

konata

>>106958267 (OP)
i really wonder Amazon will manage to continue to claim that number in the future.

Then again, burger laws make it legal to just lie in your ads to it's not a problem.

>>106960221
Never fell off because the audience still retarded.

>>106960364
C4PITAL1SM GUD?

>>106958267 (OP)
For me its buying an external drive. Kikes can tongue me anus for all I care

>>106958267 (OP)
SLA level of 99% uptime/availability results in the following periods of allowed downtime/unavailability:
>Daily: 14m 24s
>Weekly: 1h 40m 48s
>Monthly: 7h 18m 17s
>Quarterly: 21h 54m 52s
>Yearly: 3d 15h 39m 30s
SLA level of 99.9% uptime/availability results in the following periods of allowed downtime/unavailability:
>Daily: 1m 26s
>Weekly: 10m 4.8s
>Monthly: 43m 50s
>Quarterly: 2h 11m 29s
>Yearly: 8h 45m 57s
SLA level of 99.99% uptime/availability results in the following periods of allowed downtime/unavailability:
>Daily: 8.6s
>Weekly: 1m 0.48s
>Monthly: 4m 23s
>Quarterly: 13m 8.9s
>Yearly: 52m 36s
SLA level of 99.999% uptime/availability results in the following periods of allowed downtime/unavailability:
>Daily: 0.86s
>Weekly: 6s
>Monthly: 26s
>Quarterly: 1m 19s
>Yearly: 5m 16s
Anything below 99.99% is pretty bad actually

>>106958267 (OP)
>>106961828
You can clawback costs for downtime beyond what's specified in the contract so it's still decently competitive versus hosting it yourself with your own IT staff for doing it local with no guarantee of uptime. Most company IT depts are staffed by retards, too

It does become spenny when you try to keep a large amount of data in the cloud meme or want to migrate away and have to pay to take ur datas with you