Thread 106975284

I use Linux Mint.
>b-but it's insecure
i don't care
>b-but it's still using x*rg
i don't care
>b-but it's using outdated software
i don't care
>b-but the developers don't switch to rainbow logo during pride month
i don't care
Yeah, feels good.

>>106975284 (OP)
>I use Linux MinMinMinMinMinMin-- *resets PC*

>>106975284 (OP)
How do I get a gf like her?

>>106975284 (OP)
kys pedo

>>106975574
she's 19 you retard

>>106975284 (OP)
The jew fears the mint

Post rare and unusual Mint-tans

>>106975284 (OP)
I love Mint but I've been having a weird stutter in some webpages that don't happen in other distros.
Right now I'm rocking Fedora KDE and it seems flawless. If I knew how to fix the stutter I might have gone with Mint for good.
Maybe by the 2026 update.

>>106975523
what is special about her?
does she use linux?

if you don't use Mint, you're not a Linux guy

>>106975284 (OP)
Just use windows atp loser, where's your tiling window manager?

>>106975284 (OP)
I like win7 and mint
both are cool

>>106977506
true. my gf has to use xfce4 i use dwm

>glibc library is behind what many plugins require
Grim

How is mint not secure?

>>106978129
too much sovl = not souless (secure)

>>106976486
On /g/, I see so many people encountering issues with Mint, but in the years I've been using Mint, I've never had any issues. It's very stable, light, and snappy. I just want my system to work. If I want to learn Linux, I can just spin up a VM.

>>106978129
I was going ask the same thing. How is it any less secure than any other distro I use. Is it because of Xorg? if so, boo hoo bitch.

>>106978302
I've only had stability issues with Cinnamon but the xfce edition has always been completely reliable.

>>106978302
I mean, yeah, Mint is great. I've found my problem stems from having the 6.14 kernel instead of 6.17. And maybe x11 instead of wayland. My hardware works better with the latters.
Maybe the next release of Mint will include those and I'll migrate to it in no time.
At the end of the day it's not like my system doesn't work or anything. It works and it's fine. I'm just nitpicking.

>>106978320
>if so, boo hoo bitch.
keyed

LOTS of kernel talk in here from noobs who don't understand a few things:
1. Ubuntu is an LTS distro and all Mint (save LMDE which doesn't count) are built on Ubuntu LTS
2. when a kernel is 'safe' and won't bork your system there will be an update and you can get it directly from ubuntu repo
3. if you are on "6.14" you haven't updated, mint is on like 6.8

list of reasons you need the latest kernel:

>>106975284 (OP)
toasting for the mint + rat just werks combo

>>106975284 (OP)
based

>>106975284 (OP)
>derivative distro of a derivative distro
grim

>>106978672
>list of reasons you need the latest kernel:
and i took that personally

>>106980787
surely it was a mistake and he forgot them in his post

>>106977521
i downloaded mint today, and i saw that it still uses compiz, but this was the MATE version.

surely, mint isn't still using old software, for the bells and whistles....is it???

>>106980791
its ok.
i'm sorry too, i put on my war helmet on on impulse

>>106978129
>How is mint not secure?
old packages full of vulnerabilities
"security backports" are a meme