Thread 106976245

Let me guess, you need more

>>106976245 (OP)
only 6 people alive can read this

>>106976496
which is funny because its probably one of the easiest languages to read.
just think about how dude could make roller coaster tycoon by himself with just this language and some books.

>>106976496
>only 6 people alive are real programmers

>>106976496
there are only 7 people on the planet

>>106976245 (OP)
bro I wrote a for loop generator because it started to get tedious every time I wanted to iterate over an array.

>>106977152
Why not just use rust?

>>106976245 (OP)
https://www.chessprogramming.org/BootChess

I refuse to write in assembly unless it's PDP-11 and I haven't found any computers with the PDP-11 instruction set yet.

>>106976245 (OP)
There's like 0 (zero) usecase for asm except for a few parts of a kernel development

>>106976496
good morning saar

>>106976245 (OP)
which version of assembly is this?
x86??
nasm?
intel?
linux?
meme?

there's so many languages and no standard to tard wrangle them in.

the one job the government has, which is to set standards and ensure its regulation, it doesn't do.

>>106978367
fuck off commie

>>106977351
I'm not a pedophile.

>>106978367
too busy implementing hidden instructions for the ime

>>106977152
Wait wtf this is unironically clever

>>106976245 (OP)
>Read scancode
Well now you have to make a library call(on windows, atleast) in a user program that will make the right syscall to look up the right drivers, which will handle the interface from the right io port (for ps2) or memory mapped port. Many layers of abstraction over and under assembly.

Back in the early DOS days and before, the computer architect did very little beyond what the ISA advertised, just some pipelining, and the OS didn't get involved in I/O if you decided to do it directly. That was low level, no abstraction software or hardware side. Assembly programming is no longer low level today (atleast user side. Kernel level still is on software side.).

>>106976496
Pretty sure you're just illiterate

>>106978121
I'm a jeet and I can understand it just fine. Stop making up a spook in your head, anon.

>>106980998
architecture*

And not like architecture wasn't there desu, just not on microprocessors.

>>106980232
https://github.com/aussie114/c_tools
I'm pretty lazy.

>>106976245 (OP)
But how do you draw it on the screen?

>>106976245 (OP)
Why the fuck do assembly programmers put so many comments? It's like looking at my jeet professor's Java all over again.

>>106977152
>>106980232
>>106981134
Have you actually never heard of code snippets?
/g/ really is nocode these days

>>106976245 (OP)
> xchg ax, dx ; swap AX and DX
Literal retard

>>106981751
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) /* main function */
{
int x = 0; /* initialize an integer echs to zero */
…

>>106981736
Sounds like some jeet shit.

>>106981990
>I'm going to reinvent the wheel because I'm lazy but also clueless
>wheels are jeet shit

>>106977152
ultisnips
it's a dsl for creating these with keybinding management (in insert mode)

>>106981398
Because assembly is less self explanatory in what you are doing and why.

>>106976496
what do you mean? in college they made us as homework code space invaders in assembly back in 2010, we werent even a computer or programming major

>>106976245 (OP)
Once your snake is more than 2 blocks in length, if you try to reverse direction you die.

>>106982549
in real life?

>>106982728
Yes, only ever thrust forward

>>106976496
It's pretty readable imo and i don't actually write x86 assembly.

>>106976245 (OP)
Why does my back hole always feel like it's being pounded?

>>106976496
Assembly is a standard part of an ABET accredited CS program.
Pretty sure even the EEs at my uni did some uC stuff with it.
Not even a difficult thing to learn. What's more confusing is the memory layout that actually gets produced on assembly. Still don't really understand linker script sections.

>>106982509
It's just fine. A few extra comments are necessary but commenting every line like this is retarded.

>>106976245 (OP)
What's with all the unnecessary text on the right?

>xchg ax, dx
>; swap AX and DX
F
thank you for your service
F
F
F
F
F

>>106976245 (OP)
>I found a way to make my snake game 1 byte smaller. In exchange, it's completely unrecognizable, but I think the trade off was worth it.

(It's actually really cool)

>>106978367
>linux?
is there a specific syntax for linux ? Because calling conventions for subs and system calls aren't.