Thread 107050436

>>107050436 (OP)
right would unironically look better
its a waste of compute and not needed but still. this fake outrage is gay

>>107050436 (OP)
>right would unironically look better

I CAN'T WAIT FOR ALL VIDEO TO HAVE NO NOISE WHATSOEVER

>>107050436 (OP)
This will destroy so much it's incredible.

>>107050475
yeah the video game from the screenshot wouldve preffered to make their graphics look like the right thing but they just couldnt

>>107050436 (OP)
>>107050558
>This will destroy so much it's incredible
the original quality should be the default. if they force upscale it it would just not play on 720p roku tvs and other devices

she did nothing wrong

>>107050475
>this video is bad because i froze on a single frame and cropped a tiny portion of it and created a low quality jqg image

Youtube just keeps getting worse and worse and it's completely unchecked because there's zero competition whatsoever

>>107050436 (OP)
how are they going to reduce artifacts? even 1080p is unwatchable now because they compress it to shit

>>107050436 (OP)
they upcase yt shorts already, it looks like weird deep fried sharpen filter

>>107050436 (OP)
>a bazillion dollarinos to solve a none issue
Incredible, as usual.

>>107050436 (OP)
This is part of their long campaign to erase historical artifacts.

>>107051277
There are dozens of other places to host and watch videos. The problem is that you won't use them.

>>107050436 (OP)
ENHANCE
ENHANCE

>>107050436 (OP)
perfect for gorgeous looks

Right is what the designers had in mind all along, the tech just wasn't there at the time.

>>107051574
Not that anon but why the fuck would I move to some other video hosting site that has no content on it? The problem isn't fixed with just me going to a different site; video makers have to move too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9f4c9SNziE my favorite amvs becoming slop? it is not even possible to upscale this shit

>>107050436 (OP)
>1080p HD
More like 576 SD, you need to play a 4k video to actually get 1080p quality on YouTube.

>>107050436 (OP)
>to 1080p
>meaning all 720p content will be upscaled
This is such a terrible idea.

>>107051364
the companies hunger for usecases to justify all the spending on ai that theyve locked themselves into
the project managers come up with these shit 'features' to similarly justify their overpaid positions
the engineers implimenting this bullshit dont care and just want to keep their jobs so theyll do what theyre told even if its objectively a waste of compute
bleak

the future is now

adapt or get left behind

>>107050436 (OP)
Great, every fucking video is going to look like its been passed through a watercolor filter.

>>107050436 (OP)
Save literally every old video you like because it's about to be plagued with six fingers and the equivalent of those shitty ZSNES filters on everything.
Old YTPs especially will be hit the hardest because an AI cannot comprehend some of the jokes in it and will ruin them trying to 'fix' them.

>>107050466
>right would unironically look better
Mental illness.

>>107052120
Oh my God, yeah if YouTube tries to apply AI to (((enhance))) sentence mixing it's going to fuck it up so bad.

>>107052120
where does it say they'll completely erase the original video?

>>107052134
Maybe you didn't get the memo but EVERY resolution will be upscaled. Even 160 and 240p. All of it is getting hit with the AI filtering. If there is an original video, you're not going to be able to see it anymore. If a creator can get their original work is up in the air.

>>107050436 (OP)
They've already done that for some time for highres content already.
They're using an AI "sharpening" method on everything you upload so everything has that slop veneer.

>>107052153
idk if dats true. hopefully they're fucking crazy to wipe out the OG video. assuming the entire world can stream 1080p video no problem is crazy lmaoooooooo. yeah if it's just enabled by default and you're seeing blurry shit straight up then that's already bad enough. I saw some 9/11 footage (((upscaled))) and like holy shit it looks fucking terrible, it all looks blurred and smudged. I'd much rather just stare at big chunky pixels. when is this stupid fucking bubble going to pop?

>>107052049
>locked themselves into
>the project managers come up with these shit 'features'
Project managers don't make up features. That's the product managers job you dip shit.
Project managers just execute what product decides to do.

>>107052120
>Old YTPs
YTP was never funny nor original and the zoomers who thought it was are simply skibidi tier retard faggots.

are there any upscalers that look actually good? every upscaled video i've seen always looks like the meme filter in OP's pic or just the same vid but in bigger resolution

a lot of modern ai upscalers give me the same feeling i get from those trypophobia images
just some greasy, sinewy quality that's disgusting

>>107052212
Wrong, faggot.

>>107050436 (OP)
Holy Mother of Fuck, they're using SuperEagle to upscale their videos?

>>107051713
Peak can only be achieved using constrained creativity.
Pixel art and chiptune are alive and well for a reason.
If you only go by the designers you get something like picrel because there is no point in doing something "cool" anymore.

>>107052229
>are there any upscalers that look actually good
No.
It will always be making up information without full context. You're better off using your own brain to fill in the gaps, rather than having a pathetic imitation or a brain do it badly for you.

>>107050436 (OP)
this is a good thing

>>107050436 (OP)
There’s no excuse for everything not to be in 1080p original quality (non-upscaled)

>>107050475
Downie Kong

The problem is not implementing new useless stuff. Problem is that we can't disable it.

Over the air TV is still 720p or less on major channels in major cities lol

>>107050436 (OP)
https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/new-features-to-help-creators/
>auto upscale videos below 1080p with AI
>have to manually disable it for EVERY SINGLE FUCKING VIDEO that you watch
>50MB thumbnails for some bizarre reason.
Thanks, I hate it.

>>107050436 (OP)
Why not a system that transcribes audio correctly and puts it on the screen like closed captioning. Sorta like their current system but one that actually functions well.

>>107052571
>serve new, stunning 4K-resolution thumbnails
lmao, usecase for 50 MB 4K thumbnails?

>>107052256
Honestly anon running an NTSC filter on the pre-scalled resolution and then a CRT filter with bicubic/linear scaling is absolute kino.

>>107052182
yeah go watch any old music video they all have this shitty permanent filter slapped on it

>>107053126
>CRT filter
Please never reply to my posts again.

>>107050436 (OP)
>>107050475
>>107050508
reddit

>>107052208
okay so proDUCT managers then you pedantic little shit

>>107050508
compression still exists, and isn't going away

>upload a "noisy" video
>YT smudges it all to make a hi quality 'p
cant wait

They can't afford fast internet near the ganges, the poojoos at jeettube are just looking out for their fellow poos

>>107053158
Idk man I like it.
Thing with CRT(mask) effect though.
You cannot really see it while playing on an HDTV from a far unless you make it really aggressive.

>>107052127
on youtube where they crush the bitrates and you see artifacts on pixelart from old games, yea, it would look better, the alternative is upload a 1080p video in the first place instead of native resolution.

What is so Needful about this AI dogshit that Sars must shove it down our throat on youtube? weren't they having funding problems hosting anything just a few years ago?

>>107053487
> yea, it would look better,
AI can't accurately reconstruct that shit, either. For things like speedruns or playthroughs, fidelity is more important than shiny edges.

>>107053698
AI is infinite content for ostensibly "free". Not free as in beer, free as in 'no effort', because of course there is a computational cost. But subhumans and normies love zero effort content, and if Youtube can have a feature where their algorithm shovels endless AI cat videos into your gullet to keep you watching for hours, then that's great. Better than some creator needing to record their actual cat.

wow the slop trough is getting more sloppier that's crazy
pig feed ain't what it used to be

>>107051574
>other youtube alternatives
>faggots only want to use youtube
>other chan alternatives
>faggots only want to use 4chan
>there are even a ton of pornhub alternatives (no no wait, AN ABSOLUTELY ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF ALTERNATIVES)
>most of these faggots only want to use pornhub and were bitching nonstop when pornhub removed a ton of videos a few years ago

I think most people are just normalfag bot swine. That is why they refuse to budge and move to other platforms when often times the alternatives are actually way better as is the case with the porn example I gave.

>>107056112
>autistically refusing to understand the network effect

>>107051574
I want to use them but creators don't put their content there
this is not a user issue

>>107053158
Stop being a luddite

>>107050436 (OP)
Is everyone so underage they don't recognize this fucking filter? This is not the "AI" upscaling, the person is making a joke / reference to shitty old emulator scaling algorithms.

>>107052450
>>107050466
kill yourselves

>>107057964
no shit nigger

>>107058067
Is is super obvious, doesn't stop the dumbasses in this thread from thinking it's a real frame from YouTube.

>>107057562
How hard is it really to simply upload the same video file to multiple accounts?

>>107053484
>>107057951
there's other benefits to CRTs for /vr/