Thread 107050647

10 posts 4 images /g/

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 8:32:51 AM No.107050647 [Report] >>107051420

so...which one is it?

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 11:15:04 AM No.107051386 [Report]

OSI model is the correct one.
The others assume that different layers are merged because TCP/IP handle all of the missing layers without having to code it yourself.

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 11:22:54 AM No.107051410 [Report]

(1) Physical
(2) Digital

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 11:24:50 AM No.107051415 [Report]

OSI died decades ago.

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 11:26:11 AM No.107051420 [Report] >>107053374 >>107053418

>>107050647 (OP)
Doesn't matter. I used to Software Engineering, DevOps, and now Network Engineering, and I rarely think about these. You just need to understand what encapsulates what. And understand the actual protocols.

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 4:02:20 PM No.107053374 [Report]

>>107051420
>I rarely think about these. You just need to understand what encapsulates what.
read that again, slowly

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 4:05:38 PM No.107053401 [Report] >>107053428

/g/ doesn't even know the 8th layer hehe

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 4:07:28 PM No.107053418 [Report] >>107053499

>>107051420
>I only work with the application layer
>therefore there is no stack
retard

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 4:08:29 PM No.107053428 [Report]

apu_chuckle.jpg md5: 42edd9a5...

>>107053401
I was your mom's 8th layer last night

Anonymous 10/30/2025, 4:18:17 PM No.107053499 [Report]

>>107053418
I've worked with the entire stack dumb fuck. OSI model is absolutely useless except for filtering the most entry level retards. If I work with TCP traffic, I won't be thinking: "urrrm TCP is layer 4. This is critical." You'll be thinking about the actual protocols of the stack. Like Ethernet, IP, and TCP. OSI model is only useful if you're retarded.