>>107118642 (OP)
He is correct.
Subscribing to some host who simply gives you FTP access to a folder would be the easier and more straight-forward solution, that also doesn't depend on a corporation.
And you can access it anywhere with every OS having it built in.
I don't know what he is rating about svn or cvs though. Dropbox doesn't have any such ability and it isn't needed.
His comment is also misunderstood. He pointed out that it is trivial to do this, which means that the company value is limited. Would you invest into something that you know everybody can copy?
Even if the average pleb can't, every single rando shitskin can launch such a service with ease and compete with you.
He isn't suggesting that the average normie is going to do it, he is suggesting that competition can pop up within a microsecond.
And time did indeed prove him right. Nobody is using dropbox anymore. And nobody who is using it is paying for it.
It was a venture capitalist scam.