← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 107162078

13 posts 12 images /g/
Anonymous No.107162078 [Report] >>107162740 >>107163780
>client has McAfee installed on all their machines for god only knows why
>add our program to the exception list
>weeks pass and our program has a minor update
>O I see the program you manually went through the effort of adding to the exception list has changed?
>let me just remove that exception for you ;)
why is it like this?
Anonymous No.107162122 [Report] >>107162648 >>107162738
Diluc, my belovedn
Anonymous No.107162648 [Report] >>107162723 >>107162738
>>107162122
>be me
>furina banner
>roll up to pity
>get 5*
>it's not furina
>it's diluc
FUCKING FAGGOT NIGGER AAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous No.107162723 [Report]
>>107162648
>waifu faggotry
Niggerliciois.
>husbando homoeroticism
Patrician taste. Simple as.
Anonymous No.107162738 [Report] >>107162774 >>107162797
>>107162122
>>107162648
>be me
>raging homo gigafaggot
>play the game like its husbando simulator
>only roll for male characters
>only play with male characters
>havent touched a single female character
i havent played in over a year though, i feel like im too far behind to start again
Anonymous No.107162740 [Report]
>>107162078 (OP)
>McAfee
>why is it like this?
McAfee left.
Anonymous No.107162774 [Report] >>107162839
>>107162738
Real af. Though the game isn't worth it anymore, the husbandos don't really appeal to the wider goyim consumer mass that well, so chinkoverse just stuck to AI-generating the same f*male anime character tropes over and over again.

I'm a little bitter about the fact, wish it were the same exact thing except with imaginary men.
Anonymous No.107162797 [Report] >>107162928
>>107162738
I never played the games but holy shit the yaoi porn with these characters is out of this world.
Anonymous No.107162839 [Report] >>107162928
>>107162774
Nice choice in catboy, im not a fan of the ones that look weak af. I'd recommend Bete Loga from DanMachi
Anonymous No.107162928 [Report] >>107163691
>>107162839
>>107162797
For me, it's the technological implications of picrel
Anonymous No.107163691 [Report] >>107163729
>>107162928
cute kot
Anonymous No.107163729 [Report]
>>107163691
he's a dog
Anonymous No.107163780 [Report]
>>107162078 (OP)
>be AV
>dumb user manually flags one executable as safe, instead of of the dev going thru the (costly) processing of getting vetted by the default channels
>somehow, the executable changes, might be an honest update, might be something malicious, idk. How could I even know? It never went thru the formal process of specifying it is safe with the AV. Just some dumb user flagged it as safe.
>I guess I should probably block it too, unless the user manually does his own audit and specifies that it is safe and he takes full responsibility for it