Thread 107166175

>>107166175 (OP)
I mean yeah, coding is a dead end but nobody talks like that. This is really bad ragebait.
>Thank you for taking the time to complete the first phase of our interview process that included 11 technical interview rounds, and the completion of the one-week take-home project
Nobody actually provides clunky mid-sentence exposition for the benefit of the audience in real life

>>107166175 (OP)
If he is so good at coding then he should build the next big app and stop begging jews to give him scraps like a pussy

What right does a company have to take somebody's code from an interview?

>>107166175 (OP)
yeah now that verified accounts get profit sharing off viral tweets i would not trust a single one of these posts
motherfuckers do this kind of posting for a living now, they even start companies and shit

>>107166527
It's in the papers they made you sign before they interviewed you for "privacy" reasons.

Satire like this takes away from the labor abuse that's actually happening.

>>107166175 (OP)
>modifies resume to add that company
he technically worked for them right? they're using his code.

>>107166589
No wonder people put self destructive lines in their code

>>107166215
fpbp
< this is for OP

>>107166175 (OP)
>11 interview rounds

are people really that desperate?

>>107166606
>he thinks it's satire

>>107166175 (OP)
Hillarious if true, i'd sue the shit out of them if they tried.

>>107167278
>he's too dumb to understand satire

>>107166329
There is nothing worth making that hasn't already been made and is actually profitable.

The only good software that hasn't been made yet is software that can't be monetized without being made shitty or worse.

>>107167694
Kek shut the fuck up. There is always money to be made somewhere. "Everything has already been made" is the oldest excuse in the book. Do you think Facebook was a new invention? TikTok wasn't even close to being original either. And those are just examples, I'm not saying you need to make something that big.

Most of the time all you need to do is improve an existing product or provide an alternative for people with different needs. Not saying it is easy but it's not impossible.

>>107167289
You'd lose and get blacklisted from the industry

>>107166329
>Just make the next big app
Everyone who says this shit should pick a rock and smash it on their skull until they drop on the ground. If you went right now and created 5 times less bloated more efficient better feeling and more reliable Google Chrome, nobody would give a fuck, your app would not beat Google and you will never be a billionaire. Network effect makes sure that even in non-monopolistic market current companies stay big unless one of them rebrands and this change causes one of the other companies to shift niche. Reminder that TikTok didn’t come out of nowhere, it was Musical.ly that just got bought by Chinese company and rebranded. And ChatGPT was the first time normies ever got to interact with pretty smart chatbot. Outside of those there has been no big successful apps developed.

>>107167278
it is satire. most companies only have 2-3 interview rounds. anymore than that is wasting time and money on both sides.

>>107166175 (OP)
it's a good joke but now they're going to be inspired

>>107167980
I know I said big but I'm not talking about a billion dollar idea you dumb nigger. Just something that helps you make a living and stop complaining about muh job market. There are thousands of relatively unknown apps making decent money out there.

I'm really tired of retards thinking that unless they become the next Zuckerberg and hit it big on their first attempt then they shouldn't even try.

There's a former college classmate of mine that made an app with profits of $2000-2500 per month with an app that sells shitty AI generated wallpapers. It took like 2 years to reach that amount but now he has a decent passive income source and doesn't have to beg jews for a job once he graduates unlike you and me.

>>107167999
>wasting time and money on both sides
Your point?

>>107168190
how many apps have you made and how much are you making? you can give gross revenue so you dont have to include your hustler's university subscription

how many klocs did your HR dept generate this sprint?

>>107167289
>you: "so can we get a case about stealing or hiring fraud"
>lawyer: "ya but not against a company this big and even then it would have to be class action"

>>107168725
That's not how the law works unless you are a europoor. Big companies settle hundreds of lawsuits a year, something as cut and dry as this any lawyer would be chomping at the bit to sue.

>>107168706
>how about you lolol
I never said anything about me. I'm not even a coder.
I accept your concession.

>>107168755
a fat retard with opinions and advice about stuff he's never done? you dont say...

>>107168190
out of 2 billion users (500 million maybe who are actually willing to pay) one has to carve out 1000 users.

in other words you need 1000 clients minimum where they each pay 20 dollars per year to get a low ball base income

its definitely doable. there are many niches and probably a lot of old proprietary software which can be replaced with modern alternatives

>>107166215
ya fpbp. Rage bait bullshit should be banned.
Also
>Xitter screenshot
>No link
Fuck off OP.

>>107167183
the alternative is flipping burgers for the rest of your life, so yeah.

>>107168765
This is the kind of thinking you should have.
But still you prefer to attack the people who give you advice. Keep being a fucking loser.

>>107168773

>>107168826
>advice
It's shit. Unless you're connected, your software will go unsold. There is plenty of demand for software but no one wants to pay and your software won't do everything the old and busted shitware did. Then your software has to integrate with some horribly mangled SAP bullshit or Windchill or you need to somehow render a CATIA 6 model or some other enterprise bullshit behind a paywall or no open standard and your chance of success against some big software vendors goes from 100 to 0 in seconds.
The world we live in is incredibly broken and jewish.

>>107168683
Even free labor isn't enough to offset wasting 11 workers' time.

>>107166175 (OP)
That coward needs to name and shame. And then bill them for stolen code.

>>107168858
I was thinking like that before, but then I saw how easy it is to market something on social media. If you're persistent enough, you definetely could live from that. You don't need 7 figures (and you won't get that from a salary today anyway) to live decently

>>107166620
this is 100% what he should do. 11 interviews is very reasonably assumed to be at least 11 days. if anything this could have been over one or two months. I would just put it down as a temporary contract.
>>107166175 (OP)
move to a better country, retard. that is illegal in any reasonable place.

>>107168989
i used to be cringe like you. then i took an arrow to the knee

learn to cope

>>107168725
Settling out of court is cheaper than fighting a tiny suit like this that would land in small claims court. Literally just pay whatever and potentially save tens of thousands.

>>107167799
im sorry but if I went through 11 interviews and then they pulled i'd sue and if i lost. I would probably go insane. SO either way it doesn't fucking matter if I was blacklisted.

>>107166175 (OP)
>yellow AI generated avatar
>blue checkmark
i take this scenario very seriously