>>17758340 (OP)
It's a virus that destroys white people and empowers Jews

>>17758340 (OP)
Your actual ancestors have worshipped Jesus since your lineage could be traced, stormfag. You forsake your ancestors and fall for jew propaganda by giving up Jesus.

You're right. Christianity has nothing to do with skin color or even duality.

Thank you for pointing out.

>>17758358

>>17758375
>your ancestors did something stupid, so you must be stupid in perpetuity
no thanks

>>17758340 (OP)
steppe gods are not a white culture
they are gods, they are of ANE origin, Siberian not European.
this empowers Indo-Europeans and enslaves agriculturalists. we do not want ANE and churka trash
the agricultural gods were here before, the agricultural culture was replaced

>>17758340 (OP)
nice thumbnail

>>17758390
this. IE came from the steppes and had EASTERN CAUCASUS influence, it is a strange virus that ravaged Europe
return to tradition and say no to steppe trash

>>17758394
Thanks.

>>17758379
The creation of Israel in 1948 and its support is the direct result of Christians. They worship Jews as God's chosen and give them billions of dollars and help their wars.

>>17758340 (OP)
Christianity will probably be the only thing left as evidence that White people existed once shitskins inherit the Earth.

>>17758413
It was real in your mind

>>17758390
Cope
the true 100% European tradition and without any external influence are the WHG, since they are native before the Anatolian farmers came with their Middle Eastern ancestry and killed and enslaved the WHGs and their culture and religions.
related photo, I believe our shaman and her spirit will guide us to the great spirit of the animals! go back to the Mesolithic, white man say no to Abrahamism, steppenism, Anatolianism

>>17758340 (OP)
You're right, worshiping hermaphrodites is the basedboy trad thing to do

>>17758390
>>17758432
The Larpagan paradox
What tradition should they follow? And why IE? And not GAC for example? Besides, if you need to revive something, it is not tradition

Thor is better than the faggy Jesus.

>>17758441
>And why IE?
Because it’s true

>>17758448
why? why is it truer than the paganism of the farmers? and we can go further, why were the farming gods truer than the Mesolithic gods as the other anom pointed out? the farming gods have been here in Europe longer than the steppe gods

>>17758340 (OP)
Your (g)ods are owned by Disney.

>>17758465
Go on Amazon and type in "Jesus" and see how much merchandise your dumb Jew has become. He's just a product to bought and sold to gullible morons. The difference everyone knows Thor is fake, but you actually thinking flying Jews in outer space are real.

>>17758465
What would your God think if he saw people selling products of him? Jesus is more sold than Thor.

>>17758475
>flying jew
The JIDF's buzzword of the month.
you have 3 years to start your war with Iran while trump is president.
After that, Israel becomes a crater.

>>17758475
false comparison
Christianity is not restricted to the entertainment media of a multimillion-dollar company, Christianity is a religion, not characters that have copyrights in various entertainment media. You could have said that Jesus, who is his figure, is used in media, but never that anyone owns his copyrights

>>17758458
>why is it truer than the paganism of the farmers?
Because Odin exists and the farmer gods don’t

>>17758475
>flying Jews
obsessed

>>17758486
>You could have said that Jesus, who is his figure, is used in media, but never that anyone owns his copyrights
The norse gods aren’t the subject of copyright either, retard, the marvel characters that share names with the Aesir but which otherwise share very few similarities are the subject of copyright because they’re fictitious characters made up by a jew

>>17758486
Jesus is a product.

>>17758483
>>17758486
Here comes the seethe.

Enjoy those Jesus Funko Pops you pathetic Jew worshiping weak turn the other buttcheek cucks

>>17758488
This was not an answer, since Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and even tribal Africans could use the same counter-argument.
What arguments lead us to the conclusion that Odin is real and the Agrarian gods are false? The pagan argument is how the European tradition was replaced by something foreign (whatever that implies) so why does it only apply to Christianity? If you don't give me a theologically sound reason, I will have to accept that you are pagans for pure aesthetics and do not believe in Odin or Thor.

>>17758496
>>17758508
>>17758495
No, because an authorial "product" is one created by a person or entity that has the right to legal protection over it. This means that the product is original, not a copy and has an identified author. Jesus does not fit into any of the definitions mentioned above, we already have the same with Norse gods

>>17758486
My God is stronger and chadder than yours, kike.

>>17758495
you're stuck man lol learn what "authorial" means
>>17758508
These companies treat Jesus as a religious figure (even if they don't believe in him per se. Ironically, you do the same here without even realizing it haha) and not a character like Thor and Odin.

>>17758518
Enjoy those Jesus Funko Pops you pathetic Jew worshiping weak turn the other buttcheek cucks

>>17758526

>>17758511
I know Odin is real because I have encountered him physically. No abrahamic can say this because the abrahamic god asserts that he cannot be invoked and that he will not appear to people who ask him to as a matter of establishing faith. It’s called tempting god, and the Bible explicitly forbids it. Abrahamics can and often do claim to have encountered god or a miracle from god, but their very own faith tells them that this can’t be the case.
Odin in Havamal gave a very different story. He tells us that he discovered the runes, and that he provided them to mankind as a gift, and that when we invoke the Aesir by way of asking things of the runes, we shall get what we ask for. So I tested it. I asked things of the runes, and I received them.

>>17758526
>I can't spell more than 5 different words
I accept your defeat

>>17758534
This is your God >>17758530

>>17758537
I hate those Cuckholds thinking they are saving us.

>>17758522
We've heard the same shit since the beginning

>>17758543
They only make people hate Christianity more and more

>>17758531
>I know Odin is real because I have encountered him physically
we have evidence from the Neolithic of king gods, (Actually, it can occur to everyone)
therefore, they had the same experiences. and this is not a type of argument that you can use to legitimize paganism or even any belief, since the speaker must necessarily rely on his own experience, and we have no way of falsifying that. and things get worse for you when you claim that paganism, even unintentionally, is based on mere subjectivity, and therefore, cannot be a serious religious system, and if the religious system itself, in itself, has no solid precepts
>it is real because.. I saw it! believe me
the gods themselves are put in doubt. ironically, the Germans killed those who spoke about experiences with gods that they judged to be false. so, although they did not have dogmas and articles of faith established by means of a book, they had their rites and a relative oral tradition. you not being pagan
And you didn't answered me.. besides criticizes Abrahamism.

>>17758551
And they were right from the beginning. Your dumb Jewgod never returned or answered any of your prayers or brought about his Jew Kingdom. Complete failure.

>>17758557
>falsifying
falsifiable*

>>17758531
>I know Odin is real because I have encountered him physically. No abrahamic can say this
Got some news for you, retard.

>>17758568
Bad reading comprehension. Abrahamics DO say this, but they cannot say it. As in, their religion forbids it.
You cannot murder another human. But yet hundreds of people are murdered every day.
>>17758557
>I don’t like your empirical testing methods! So instead of attempting to replicate them, I’m just going to cry about it and tip my fedora!!!
whatever fag

>>17758579
True, you can't physically encounter God because God isn't physical. None of you seem to understand this with your broken monist worldviews. Atheists and larpers fighting is infighting as far as I'm concerned, you're all pagans

>>17758592
Jesus (God) ascended into outer space in a meat suit according to your belief

>>17758579
>As in, their religion forbids it.
I get it, you're confused by the trinity and mix up Christianity for the synagogue of Satan and a false prophet.
Common mistake, its okay, we've been helping the mentally deficient understand it for 2 millennium now.

>>17758592
The people in the old testament see god multiple times

>>17758592
If he interacts with the world, then he is physical as well as non-physical. The Aesir incarnate as physical avatars that exist within the physical universe, but these avatars are emanations of fixed essences that exist without the universe. Saying that the god of the Bible is solely non-physical is gibberish, as the Bible repeatedly shows him physical interacting with the world and with people.

>>17758606
There is no understanding the Trinity because it's nonsensical. The official church position is "it's a mystery".

Sorry you old crusty dying boomer, you just can't win. I hope you die soon. I'll hail Satan on top of your grave.

>>17758615
do you read off a script they give you?
or is this seriously the best you can do?

>>17758626
I can run circles around you with your own Bible and church traditions making you look like a fool and your wrinkly old dying boomer ass will never be able to keep up.

>>17758610
These were apparitions of the pre-incarnate Son of God.
>>17758614
>If he interacts with the world, then he is physical as well
Non sequitur

>I can run circles around you with your own Bible and church traditions making you look like a fool and your wrinkly old dying boomer ass will never be able to keep up.

>>17758632
>These were apparitions of the pre-incarnate Son of God

It doesn't say that anywhere in the Bible. This is pure Christcuck fantasy.

>>17758634
>Calls you a boomer
>You post a boomer facebook meme as a response

>>17758640
John 1:18, clown

>>17758579
that was not an answer.
furthermore, empiricism is not the same as the mere subjectivism that you use as fact, in fact, empirical fact is that knowledge acquired throughout life, in everyday life, that has no scientific proof whatsoever, but the problem here is that you do not know what empiricism is.. necessarily
it requires that hypotheses and theories be tested against observations of the natural world, and not just based on a priori reasoning or intuition (your case)
ironically, it constitutes an essential pillar of the scientific method, in which all hypotheses and theories must be subjected to rigorous testing and confronted with empirical evidence from the natural world, instead of being based exclusively on deductive reasoning, intuition or unverified insights.

>>17758632
>Non sequitur
Not at all. The world is simply that which is physical. We have nothing in the whole of human history that would lead us to believe that things which are entirely non-physical are capable of influencing things which are solely physical, and vice versa.

>>17758647
>it requires that hypotheses and theories
That is not empiricism, however.

>>17758644
That's talking about Jesus being born and going on his ministry, not appearing in the Hebrew Tanakh

>>17758379
You can thank patriarchal IE culture for the traditional northwestern European nuclear family. Semitic culture is matrilocal, even as espoused in the Bible. Jesus was a tranny who advocated castration for the sake of the kingdom of heaven.

Christboomers shitting their adult diapers right about now

>>17758649
That is an argument from ignorance and begging the question. God exists outside of the world, and is the creator of the world. He occupies no position in space, is not affected by time, and has no physical properties. He is able to influence the world by His omnipotent power.

>>17758340 (OP)
It is. Just because you hate Jews doesn't mean you can deny that whites worshipped Jews for almost 2000 years (Jesus fucking Christ, pathetic...)

>>17758659
That vid is every Christcuck on this board. Jew worshiping cucks to the core.

>>17758654
>No one has seen God at any time
Who did they see?
>the only God, who is at the Father's side, He has made Him known

>>17758660
I'm 25.

>>17758666
Yes, whites were enslaved to that Jewish religion for thousands of years but are now breaking free thanks to science and Atheism, and the dam is about to burst.

>>17758663
>God can interact with things that are antithetical to his nature and which are of totally unalike substance
this is just a fancy way for you to say that god lacks all definition and substance. Meaning of course that he is not real.

>>17758677
Here's your freedom bro

>>17758650
yes, it is. you should perhaps research concepts beyond the field of mere etymology, you confuse a priori reasoning with "empiricism", using semantics to support your supposed experience does not make you intelligent. empiricism has its heuristic methodologies.
empiricism established the fundamental bases of modern scientific methodology, not your intuition

>>17758680
This is just a fancy way for you to say you don't like it.

>>17758672
They saw Jesus walking around Galilee

In the Tanakh, when they saw God, they just saw an angel imbued with God's authority that delivered God's message. They didn't actually see Yahweh. That angel wasn't the Son, as Hebrews says Jesus is not an angel.

>>17758676
Time to grow up out of your Semitic fairytale phase

>>17758685
No, not really

>>17758684
Empiricism is an epistemology, and it states that beliefs are only justified if justified by sense-perception. Theories and hypotheses are not part of it, raw sense-perception is A-OK. Empiricism is obviously an error, bankrupt, and indefensible. The sole basis upon which knowledge is possible is the revelation of God.

>>17758683
I walk outside and don't see that. I do see your churches being boarded up though.

>>17758690
That's fair, it's also a strawman.
>>17758689
It is not possible for one who has been redeemed to be plucked from Christ's hand. The Holy Spirit was given to me as the down payment of my salvation.

>>17758689
They can't. It's the only sense of power they'll ever have. Jew worshiping and forcing Jew worship on others is their entire identity.

>>17758698
Bible-believing churches are growing. Those boarded up churches have rainbow flags on them, they're part of your religion anyways.

>>17758700

>>17758691
>justified by sense-perception
Vague and stop using chatgpt or Wikipedia, it's easy to see you doing that. it's essential that the evidence is public and incontrovertible, like observable physical objects or events, and does not depend on private mental states, sorry.
On the other hand, a priori knowledge is considered innate or justified by rational intuition, not depending on empirical evidence, in a nutshell, fanfic

>>17758710
You've already been defeated. You're going to live to see your demise. Jesus won't return to save you and you won't be going to heaven. Time to eat shit.

>>17758691
>>17758579
you didn't see cuckdin
empirical evidence can come from observation or experimentation, but the difference is that experimentation involves active manipulation, creating phenomena for study, while observation is more passive, is it so hard to understand this?

>>17758724
>Vague
Forgot I was talking to people with IQs below 75
>stop using chatgpt or Wikipedia, it's easy to see you doing that
I'm speaking from my knowledge, clown.
>it's essential that the evidence is public and incontrovertible, like observable physical objects or events, and does not depend on private mental states, sorry.
No, tranny, you do not need to get the fact you're looking at a computer right now peer-reviewed
>On the other hand, a priori knowledge is considered innate or justified by rational intuition, not depending on empirical evidence, in a nutshell, fanfic
Now justify coherent sense-perception.

>You've already been defeated. You're going to live to see your demise. Jesus won't return to save you and you won't be going to heaven. Time to eat shit.

>>17758736
It's not useful, the guy is so desperate to have the slightest support for his supposed "contact" that he needs to make arguments in bad faith where empiricism is confused with a priori reasoning. I m out

>>17758749
I can tell you're seething HARD

>>17758728
>outdated metrics
Why do Atheists lie?
>https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/26/us/christianity-us-religious-study-pew.html

>inb4 migrants
its young white men returning to church.

>>17758755
I'm laughing at you.

>>17758413
>They worship Jews as God's chosen
Those who identify as Jews today have no connection to the Biblical Jews.

>>17758531
>abrahamic

>>17758340 (OP)
Its not. But the words of Rabbi Yeshuah Ben Yosuf have been so prominent in the development of the european peoples, that his asiatic, semitic origin is conveniently forgotten and kvetched about if mentioned.

>>17758740
>Forgot
>clown
>tranny
>sense-perception
I accept your concession
Your a priori reasoning is useless here. It is different from knowledge that comes from practical experience, which can be applied universally. Do you even know how empiricism works? (Often, empirical knowledge is that knowledge transferred from generation to generation.)
An example is a farmer who knows exactly when to plant and harvest each vegetable without needing a course, just because he learned from experience and previous results, no
>I saw Odin, okay? I saw it because I hate abstract Christianity
You don't understand philosophy, much less mythology, and stop using Wikipedia and chatgpt, it's shameful.
and empiricism is susceptible to error anyway, so even if you knew what it could mean, it wouldn't be a good argument. especially when you didn't answer ANY of my QUESTIONS.... Hindus, Africans, Neolithic kings, etc. all had their "empirical" experiences, or you're all wrong, you can't all be right. or you're right, but since you haven't demonstrated it beyond a childish anger at Christianity, we can accept it all as nothing more than a mere fanfic.
Empirical knowledge is knowledge that comes from people's experience. It is what we learn in practice, from our interaction and observation of the world.

>>17758776
>semitic origin is conveniently forgotten and kvetched about if mentioned.
read a fucking history book.
No one tried to hide the Jewish origins of Christianity until post WW2 American stormfags got ahold of it.

Christianity has always been reformed Judaism that is also blasphemed by jews.
This is why Jews hate Christ and claim in their Talmud he's boiling in feces in hell.
This is why Christians have hated jews since the crucifixion.

Learn the fucking difference between a Jew and a Christian before you come onto a history board, retard.

>>17758776
A simple example may disprove the argument that Christianity enabled Jews to dominate Western civilization. In pre-revolutionary Catholic France, Jews had little influence over society and limited rights. It was only with the rise of the Enlightenment in the late 18th century that the French state began to treat Jews more leniently. With the French Revolution, one of the first actions of the revolutionary assembly was to abolish Catholicism as the state religion, granting Jews full rights and access to French institutions. Thus, it was secularists, not Catholics, who opened the door for the integration of Jews into French society.

>>17758783
>Your a priori reasoning is useless here.
You're an idiot
>It is different from knowledge that comes from practical experience, which can be applied universally
What is? What are you even talking about, genius? Do you even know what the word empirical means?
>Do you even know how empiricism works?
I told you what it means, it is an epistemology which rejects the justification of belief by any other means but sense-perception.
>Often, empirical knowledge is that knowledge transferred from generation to generation.
This is knowledge from tradition, which is sometimes accepted by empiricists, but that only highlights the inconsistencies of empiricists' beliefs.
>An example is a farmer who knows exactly when to plant and harvest each vegetable without needing a course, just because he learned from experience and previous results
This involves no theory or hypothesis, just as I stated.
>You don't understand philosophy, much less mythology, and stop using Wikipedia and chatgpt, it's shameful.
You're an idiot. Clowns like you are walking arguments against democracy. I told you what empiricism is, I do not subscribe to it, nor am I a pagan. While empirical evidences are a valid source of knowledge they are not the only one, and the only basis for human knowledge is the revelation of God.

>>17758783
>a childish anger at Christianity
An atheist accusing anyone of this lmao

>>17758755

>>17758814
You have really shown yourself to be a person with inaccurate philosophical knowledge, therefore, the conversation is useless. You will not receive any more responses and your posts will be disregarded from here on, insults have disqualified you
I didn't read it, btw

>>17758790
>No one tried to hide the Jewish origins of Christianity
The people who claim to be Jews today are not Jews. Get that through your head somehow, anon.

>>17758783
empiricism has become synonymous with
>man I think that's it because my intuition said
>>17758757
Ok? What's the problem here?

>>17758772
I know you guys don’t like the term because you’re all a bunch of mega autists who are hyper-fixated on your pointless, perpetual interjudaic conflict, but Muslims, Jews, and Christians are all basically the same from my perspective, so naturally I am more inclined to lump you all together rather than referring to you all individually.

>>17758340 (OP)
Whiteness is not Christian culture.

>>17758728
Its me
I was wrong sorry

>>17758783
>>I saw Odin, okay? I saw it because I hate abstract Christianity
lol I’m the anon who had an encounter with the All-Father. You haven’t been talking to me in easily over half an hour you fucking retard

>>17758841
Actually is

>>17758790
>jews hate christians

>christianity is the continuation of judaism

stop the cap. they despise you in a way you despise an annoying fanboy who thinks he's closer than he thinks he is lol.

rabbi yeshua ben yosef is the culmination of jewish narcissism. a jewish lord that reigns over the gentile world lol.

>>17758840
I just don't like seeing you subverted by what is obvious goyslop terminology that was invented in the last twenty years, anon.

>>17758900
Ok well when I say abrahamic you instantly know what I’m talking about, even if the term bothers your booty. I could use a different term to gloss the three religions like zoobledooble or splabloobla or whatever the fuck but then you wouldn’t know what I’m talking about and I’d have to constantly define my terms which would defeat the whole point of using a gloss term in the first place

Nobody with a brain believes in Semitic fairytales. There are two reasons Christianity is shilled on imageboards:
1. Literally the fucking feds. They do it to deradicalize political extremists. It works because Christianity is AIDS.
2. More brown people online than ever before

>>17758866
It's hard to grasp how stupid you need to be to have a worldview that consists entirely of "I hate Jews"

The white gods are weak. They were thoroughly destroyed the moment the jew god entered their domain, what you hear are just echoes. The white race needs the guidance of the Orisha, only through the power of vodoo can the white race be saved

>>17758940
judaism literally teaches jews that nonjews are soulless animals to be killed, raped, swindled and dispossessed. this is not a fringe belief.

>>17758906
People who use that term are adopting the language of a certain ideological viewpoint called syncretism. Syncretism tends to try to minimize the differences between different beliefs and to imply they're all really saying the same thing when they are not. This is a recent trend, and that's why you find people using the neologism now all of a sudden. Historically, and on metaphysical terms, it doesn't make sense to create such a specific grouping, which is why it didn't exist until very recently when people promoting this sort of revisionist agenda appeared. Christianity does not include unitarians, and it doesn't make sense to group them together with unitarians. I mean, maybe if you're a syncretist who wants to merge the major faith traditions and minimize the differences, or if you just follow whatever the atheist books tell you to do, you might decide to use that term but I can't think of another reason. Maybe you know though, is there some special reason why you would focus on Abraham, who is just one historical figure that doesn't figure that prominently, rather than wanting to talk about theism generally? Believing that Abraham existed is not as meaningful of a distinction, or doesn't seem to be for any practical purpose, as believing in God (or not).

>>17758971
Is that what Christians believe?

>>17758757
Trump and Christian Nationalism have given it a small boost, but once that's over it will continue its downward spiral. Young white men were not meant to worship Jews and will grow out of it.

>>17758990
>JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS

>>17758940
It's hard to grasp how stupid you need to be to have a worldview that consists entirely of "I hate White people"
But Jews exist so here we are. White people would have to be insane to not hate Jews who do nothing but work towards their elimination. Hating people who have malicious intentions towards you is healthy and normal. If Jews want to stop warring against the white race, they have my permission. All antisemitism is justified so long as Jews create it through their own actions.

From racial state to racist state:
Ireland on the eve of the citizenship referendum
By Ronit Lentin
>I propose an interrogation of how the Irish nation can become other than white (Christian and settled), by privileging the voices of the racialised and subverting state immigration but also integration policies. Stage one of such interrogation would be to do all we can to defeat the citizenship referendum on June 11.
https://archive.is/m0OSm

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ronit_Lentin&oldid=1187581919
>Ronit Lentin (Hebrew: רונית לנטין; born 25 October 1944)
>Citizenship:
>Israeli
>Irish

Christianity must defend itself against leftoid "historians" claiming it to be the "white man's religion" and defend itself against rightoid "historians" claiming it to be the "jew religion"

funny how it fits into neither category.

>>17758998
>JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS
What every Christian thinks about 24/7.

Here's a pastor literally indoctrinating children by telling them
>The Jews are better than us
https://youtu.be/p2_p_qwIyZ4

>>17758979
your nose is showing

>>17759038
i accept your concession.

>>17758998
You literally worship The King of the Jews. So when talking about your Jewish religion, it's only right to mention its Jewishness. Do you not understand that?

>>17759042
claiming victory when you lost is embarrassing boychik. the JIDF is not sending their best

>>17758974
>syncretism is a recent trend
huh????
>it minimizes differences
yeah, it does. So does any category. Calling both a palm and an oak minimizes how radically different palms and oaks are in terms of structure, appearance, biology, you name it. Categories minimize differences for the sake of linguistic economy.
I don’t really care that Jews, Muslims, and Christian have differing perspectives on Jesus’ nature. They are all defined in same way relative to the myth of Jesus and other significant Hebrew figures like Moses.
My worldview as a heathen is 0% defined relative to the myth of Jesus. He doesn’t factor into my cosmology, my dogmas, my parables, my axioms. Not even to the most minimal extent. Sure Jews believe he did not fulfill the OT prophecies and Christians believe he did. But my religion says who fucking cares what Jesus did because he wasn’t a god and the OT prophecies were meaningless drivel. The difference between Christians and Jews exists, but is vastly smaller relatively speaking than between Abrahamics and myself. So when these things are compared, the much smaller differences fade into the periphery, and so all the Abrahamics get glossed into one category.

>>17759030
>Here's a pastor literally indoctrinating children by telling them
>The Jews are better than us
Ok, but the modern people who call themselves Jews have nothing to do with the Biblical Jews in the first place. Not to mention that isn't even true of actual authentic Jews either.

>>17759091
>syncretism is a recent trend
>huh????
Yeah, it's becoming more popular. That's why you have stuff like pic related.

>So when these things are compared, the much smaller differences fade into the periphery, and so all the Abrahamics get glossed into one category.
In that paragraph you failed to explain why theist wouldn't be a more meaningful category. After all, there are atheists and other groups who believe that a guy named Abraham existed, but they deny the concept of God as described in the Bible, which is a more important and meaningful distinction. You would lump them together with theists for unknown reasons, seemingly either political motivations, or based on copying atheist books that use the term.

>>17759098
>Ok, but the modern people who call themselves Jews have nothing to do with the Biblical Jews in the first place.
Jews literally have native Levantine ancestry from the Iron Age and earlier. They just have European ancestry that waters it down.

>>17759109
>why theist wouldn't be a more meaningful category.
Because people don’t generally understand the word theist to refer to practitioners of near eastern religions.
>there are atheists and other groups who believe that a guy named Abraham existed
The etymological relevance of the term is kind of irrelevant. Because this is, again, a matter of linguistic economy, using a more obscure, if more apt, term is completely worthless to me.

>>17758866
>>17758971
>>17759078
Christianity is from Rabbi Yeshua ben Yosef. This Jew observed Hanukkah (John 10:22-23) and came only for Jews (Matthew 15:22-28). He forbid preaching to goyim (Matthew 10:5-6). He told a goya who gave him water that her religion was bullshit and that "salvation is of the Jews" (John 4:22).

All his talmidim were Jewish, including Rabbi Shaul haTarsi. He stressed HaShem hasn't forgotten (Romans 11:1) his chosen people (Deuteronomy 7:6). He adds that Jews come first and the goyim after (Romans 1:16, 3:1-2). Also, he was a proud Parush (Philippians 3:5). Contrary to what apostate heretics believe, Yeshua loved them (Matthew 23). He only criticized some for teaching traditions as mitzvot while omitting actual mitzvot. Like in Matthew 15:1-20. Read this passage whole for once.

Shaul said the covenant is eternal and that Mashiah will come from Israel, not from the goyim (Romans 9:3-5). The covenant gives Israel the land (Genesis 17:7-8, Jeremiah 7:7) from the Nile to the Euphrates (Genesis 15:18). Arabs and other Semitic people are not included (Genesis 50:24). Jeremiah 31:31-33 does predict a new covenant... with Jews. Not goyim. Yeshua adds he didn't come to abolish the law (Matthew 5:17). He came to fulfill... prophecies. "Fulfilling the law" is an apostate's way of saying abolishing without owning it.

Goyim are welcome in the new covenant (they were in the old too, see the Book of Ruth). But HaShem wants them to be watchmen for Israel (Ezekiel 33:7). He will judge them for how they treated Jews (Genesis 12:1-3, Joel 3:1-2). A good talmid of Yeshua must:
1. Pray for peace in Jerusalem (Psalms 122:6-7);
2. Make the Jews jealous, not afraid or angry (Romans 11:11);
3. Comfort Jews (Joshua 40:1-2);
4. Help Jews out with money (Romans 15:26-27).

Bonus:
1. Revelations 12 describes Satan attacking Israel. It reuses the symbols from Yosef's dream (Genesis 37:9).
2. Ezekiel 37 describes the rebirth of Israel as a nation after the Holocaust.

>>17759123
Rabbi Yeshua ben Panthera

His mother Mariam was an adulterous whore

>>17759123
>Jesus was jewish
and water is wet.
This coypasta might have more impact on /pol/

Theres a weird ass cat killer machine
short about it: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0AbTXwuKX9k

>>17758340 (OP)
Trvke

>>17759120
>Because this is, again, a matter of linguistic economy,
I don't know about that, man. That seems fishy to me. I suspect people are using it nowadays as a crutch, because everyone knows Judaism (all variations) and Mohammadism are false, and laughably so, so you want to mentally tie those to Christianity like dead weights, and therefore not have to think as much about Christianity itself.

That would be why atheists and syncretists would like to always use that term if they could, that is as a kind of mental crutch, and it is probably why the term was coined.

>>17759145
I think everyone knows that Christianity is the least retarded of the three abrahamic faiths (of course, that isn’t really saying much), which is why it gets attacked the most. Jews don’t defend their religion because they’re all just LARPing atheists, and Islamic apologists just shit their pants and start screeching when you tear their dumb religion apart. Christianity can at least put up a fight, so naturally people fight it.
The purpose of the abrahamic monicker is simply to point out that the origins of these religions are heavily intertwined. The difference between Christianity and Judaism is one of interpretation only. They have mostly the same holy books and many of the same religious figures, and the difference comes from how you interpret their respective teachings and how you weigh the significance of the central figures. Jews obviously rank Jesus very low because they think he was a false prophet, whereas Christians rank him very high as they think he’s the son of god. Then Muslims are kind of in the middle, thinking he was a human prophet.
Compare this to a practitioner of Shinto who has no overlap in holy texts, and the weight to which he accords the central figures of the abrahamic faiths is “who the fuck are these random ass fucking jews?”

>TFW kikes are losing it in their own thread so they start spamming /his/ with blacked porn.

>>17758676
That's grim. Go get married you faggot. Start a small business or get a hobby other than this insane shit. Ironically, every one of your Christian ancestors would think you're gay or defective for not producing children by 20.
That goes for everyone who browses this shithole 24/7 on a spam campaign.