>Adam and Eve have kids
>Brothers and sisters flood the world with their inbred spawns
>Merciful God kills everyone so Noah and his sons repopulate the world fucking each other's wives and their children inbreeding with each other
>Lot gets raped by his daughters and makes more inbred kids
Can inbreeding explain why they love their religion so dearly?

>>17761518 (OP)
THE INCEST WAS A METAPHOR GOY

>>17761518 (OP)
Y-you're a jew OP..

>>17761518 (OP)
Nah...You see Yahweh modified their genes so that they don't get any negative effects from inbreeding. Then at some point in history where there were enough people he stopped the modification of genes to let the natural process go. ;)

>>17761545
Wow, Yahweh sure performed a lot of miracles to make mandatory incest sex happen.

>>17761554
YHWH is not that based

Behold...the retard trinity

Let’s forget about the IQ factor in this scene and let’s think about good vs evil. Good people see Earth as a bad place at the moment and do not wish to create any further Humans. Bad people, however, think that the Earth is a good place at the moment and are ok with reproducing. This means that bad people will educate their kids in a bad way leading to an Earth filled with bad people. The world will naturally populate with evil and a reset is inevitable.

https://youtu.be/sP2tUW0HDHA

>>17761518 (OP)
You are as retarded as a literalist.

>>17761957
is inbreeding a metaphor for something I don't get?

>>17761940
you're just mentally ill because of overpopulation anon. I'm sorry you've internalized that

>>17761539
Jews believe in these retarded stories, they were the ones who wrote em

>>17761518 (OP)
Inbreeding is harmful due to mutation accumulation. It's more likely for broken genes to express themselves in that scenario.

However, in he very beginning, if there were no mutations yet, there was no problem with inbreeding, because there were no borken genes to begin with.

It was only later when God forbade intermarriage - it was because so many mutations accumulated that it started causing actual problems.

>>17763155
>if there were no mutations yet,
biggest IF I've ever seen, and I've seen many a pathetic cretard

>>17763159
>biggest IF I've ever seen, and I've seen many a pathetic cretard
The proper word should be "since".
Each generation has more mutations than the previous one - and don't even try to debate this. It's been discovered decades ago, and it's an undeniable fact.

Now, if you apply logic to this - if each generation has more gene copying mistakes (mutations), there must've been point 0, where it all started.

That's the logical conclusion.

Here's Sanford explaining it in more detail:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY98io7JH-c

>>17763167
>Each generation has more mutations than the previous one - and don't even try to debate this. It's been discovered decades ago, and it's an undeniable fact.
Must be true if pastor Jimbob told you so in sunday school
Meanwhile back here in reality mutations don't work this way

>>17763167
Retard there's no such thing as a 'mutation' free human
Humans didn't pop out of the ground (or a garden) life always had mutations
Also if true, why did your jew god create mutations?
>gene copying mistakes (mutations)
why would perfect creations of a perfect being have such mistakes

>since is real when it's convenient to me
oy vey

>>17763177
>Retard there's no such thing as a 'mutation' free human
>Also if true, why did your jew god create mutations?
You understood a grand total of 0% of what I wrote.
Every creation, overtime, degenerates. Cars accumulate rust, houses accumulate mold, etc.
And the human genome is no different (why would it be? Why would the laws of physics avoid living beings?)
>life always had mutations
Yes, but there has to be a starting point. If each generation has more of it, then logically - every previous generation had to have fewer, until point 0.

And there have been attempts to calculate the age of our genome, calculating the mutation rate - you have it in pic here: >>17763155 .

And don't bother "oy veying" me - jews despise christianity, especially catholicism.

>>17763237
>until point 0.
life didn't start as humans
if you are going to talk genetics and evolution you can't only take in things convenient to you

>>17761940
>Good people see Earth as a bad place at the moment and do not wish to create any further Humans.
No, they wanted to create humans, they didn't say anything about earth being a bad place, they just didn't want to make personal sacrifices, so they both wanted to have top tier careers and a baby at middle age, but fertility doesn't always work like that.

>>17763246
Oh so now we're pushing the ape-to-human fallacy?
Horses were always horses, dogs were always dogs, and humans were always humans.
There's no evidence to suggest otherwise - if crossed, the resulting species are inferior, and often infertile.

And if you believe mutations caused this, I'm very curious how can you explain how genetic copying mistakes led to the emergence of humans (either from apes, or anything else).

>sciene is real when I want it
>science is fake when I don't like it
At least he admits he's result of inbreeding

>>17763115

Overpopulation is the reason you're going to eat ze bugs, live for life in rent, and die with pain because of cynical halfwits getting their dopamine-serotonin high knowing others have it bad than them.

>>17763260
>They wanted to create humans (...) they just didn't want to make personal sacrifices, (...) both wanted to have top tier careers and a baby at middle age, but fertility doesn't always work like that.

Why does society's ruleset forced them to consider fertility at middle age, we will never know...

>inb4 sacrifices

Why is that the default?