The greatest thinker ever.

The American lust for Jew dick is unexplainable.

Nah, Stirner had it right.

>>17763376 (OP)
Nah, Buddha had it right.

>>17763380
the jewish lust for germanic lastnames is greater

>>17763415
It kind of sucks to be a German with a Hebrew first name. people just assume I'm a degenerate Jew even though my ancestry is 100% European and Christian as far back as I can trace it.

>>17763376 (OP)
>Literally introduces an ideology that hollows out the entire Western world and floods it with thirdies, destroys the ability for the state to function and causes all civicism to die in 30 years.
Yeah, what a genius. Libertarians and Neoliberals will go down as the grave diggers of the civilized western world.

>>17763376 (OP)
Hoppe better
>>17763452
>destroys the ability for the state to function
Yeah, that's kind of the point, nigger

>>17763463
Yeah, except without a state in a Capitalist order, you just get private oligarchs setting up their own dual power systems and assfucking everyone else, which is what we are seeing.
Fuckhead Libertarians and Neoliberals are the result simply of the Business Plot going underground and setting up their own NGOs to worm through the system and play the long game to restore the Gilded age.
Neolibearlism/Libertarianism is literally the shittiest fucking system imaginable. Not even the USSR at it's worst harmed white european civilization. Thanks to Neoliberals, White people will likely be endangered species by the end of the century and Western society will be completely annihilated.

>>17763438
Just sleep tight knowing that the Elohim is the semitic pipedream version of Alvheim. Niflheim refers to when the Laacher see turned the north sea area into a realm of mist out of which the refugees fled, being the basis for european and middle eastern tales of aquatic priests arriving from the west. (the north sea and atlantic coast area used to be a very wealthy megalithic culture with sealhunting and similar).
"Eden" the much more modern sinking of Doggerbank, which sparked the migration that caused the rise of the PIE, the people that build stonehenge and the arrival of the single-person lavish moundgrave hype into Egypt, adopted as a trope from arriving horselords merging with the atlantic megalithic family grave culture of Osiris. Jews are the 3 children of Loki. Still family in myth however wretched they may be in their twisting of words.

>>17763452
Rothbard opposed immigration

>>17763452
There it is. Remember, "neoliberalism" is a left wing boogeyman that they use to blame all of their failures on.

The fact that this image has Tony Blair, a literal Fabian socialist, as an example of a "neoliberal" is hilarious.

>>17763376 (OP)
Did he have a quote saying that companies shouldnt care about their employees and should only care about their profit margins, and that companies that do care about their employees are socialism?

>>17763376 (OP)

>Governments should like stop telling corporations what to do and stop taxing them. G-g-g-good things will happen!!!

Wow how deep.

>>17763470
Then why most bushiness magnates and NGOs shill for leftist and against libertarian polices ?
If anything they push for an increase of state power and more regulations

>>17763552
no

>>17763376 (OP)
The ugliest kike ever
Physiognomy proves goodness, therefor he’s the most evil person to ever exist

>>17763542
>neoliberalism is a boogeyman
Ignore your lying eyes and ears goyim

>>17763615
> Then why most bushiness magnates and NGOs shill for leftist and against libertarian polices ?
Business magnates are literally the only people in the world who are culturally liberal/fiscally conservative, which describes the average libertarian.
> If anything they push for an increase of state power and more regulations
No, they are simply ruthless opportunists who support whatever is good for them and their business and bad for their competitors. Whether that involves decreasing or increasing regulation is irrelevant. Personal political beliefs rarely factor in when you get up to that high level of political and economic power.

>>17763930
LOL

>>17763951
Neoliberalism throws moronic lolberts for a loop because neoliberalism is essentially using the economic lessons learned from the Keynesian era to control the economy purely for the benefit of capital rather than the capital/public balance the Keynesians tried to maintain. They're still dead set against democratization of the economy and worker-led collectivism. Neoliberalism is what any lolbert society would eventually turn into to maintain private control over the economy through force and prevent the inevitable turbulence of a truly "free" market.

>>17763376 (OP)
Took out everything of value from people like Benjamin Tucker. Private property (especially absentee property) requires a State to enforce. You can't enforce your claim over long tracts of land or an apartment filled will others when everyone is armed. Right's enforcement agencies are government. You're paying armed forces who have the power of binding arbitration. Restricting it's direction to those who can buy it's services. This was outlined by Gustave de Molinari and Aubron Herbert over a century ago. The latter, the OG Voluntaryist, considered it only right that the propertied control governance with proposed voluntary funding services. In fact Herbert in the Right and Wrong of Compulsion critiques anarchists like Benjamin Tucker (who advocated for polycentric law), by saying that competing governance is not at all anti-state. Which Tucker later recanted his views on. Both Molinari and Herbert accepted that organizations relegated to securing rights are government. No matter what they're called, how they function, or how they're funded.

You fundamentally can't have the NAP enforced as a law if you have multiple rights enforcement agencies. Because they have every incentive to wipe out other agencies and enforce laws favorable towards their organizational model. And also an organization that can make laws will always make laws favorable towards their organizational model and never use the NAP as a standard. There will inevitably be competing ideas of what counts as "aggression," since different agencies will interpret the NAP in different ways.
The absence of an objective perspective conceptually makes this a component of how information operates.

>>17764024
And also one last thing. Also the Classical Anarchists (à la Proudhon, Malatesta, Kropotkin, Bakunin, Goldman, etc.. ) have historically proposed that the etymology for anarchy is not ἄν-αρχος (without Chief/Ruler, which is an anachronistic etymology) but, ἄν-αρχή. Αρχή being the Greek word for "method of government", "authorities", "rules", "command" or "hierarchy". So without authority/hierarchy/command. You only get the redefinition of anarchism as mere statelessness/without rulership in the 50's (Yes this is an explicit appeal to authority, but if there is a long tradition of a word being used in one way to define an idea with a whole milieu to it; it's better to keep it and come up with a new term for something else then redefining it).

>>17763552
That is all companies should care about. Its up to the employee to make sure they have a good deal working for that company.

>>17763452
Do you think Blair and Cameron are Rothbardians? Rothbard did not "introduce" modern welfare state liberalism...he was a great critic of it.

>>17764024
>>17764027
These are good posts. Thank you for making them I enjoyed reading them.

>>17763376 (OP)
>“The coming of Caesarism breaks the dictature of money and its political weapon, democracy. After a long triumph of world-city economy and its interests over political creative force, the political side of life manifests itself after all as the stronger of the two. The sword is victorious over the money, the master-will subdues again the plunderer-will. If we call these money-powers 'Capitalism,' then we may designate as Socialism the will to call into life a mighty politico-economic order that transcends all class interests, a system of lofty thoughtfulness and duty-sense that keeps the whole in fine condition for the decisive battle of its history, and this battle is also the battle of money and law. The private powers of the economy want free paths for their acquisition of great resources. No legislation must stand in their way. They want to make the laws themselves, in their interests, and to that end they make use of the tool they have made for themselves, democracy, the subsidized party. Law needs, in order to resist this onslaught, a high tradition and an ambition of strong families that finds its satisfaction not in the heaping-up of riches, but in the tasks of true rulership, above and beyond all money-advantage. A power can be overthrown only by another power, not by a principle, and no power that can confront money is left but this one. Money is overthrown and abolished only by blood."

>>17763400
Why though? Buddha is a creator of a life denying cult.

>>17763470
>Except without a state
>You get a state
>So you should just cuck everything to the state to begin with
Really good argument for commies being retarded.
It's almost as if the people you're speaking of are against legal monopolies like the state and would physically remove and boycott said monopolists because they aren't violent retards.
>Read hoppe
>Or fuck, just go listen to Murphy from Mises media on youtube, they have FREE lectures, as in actually free unlike gooberment programs
because IP is fake and gay

>>17764024
Natural law solves this

That’s not me

>>17763470
They didn't "go underground." They did it right out in the open, it was called the 80th Congress and the Taft-Hartley act. The advent of neoliberalism was inevitable after that because it completely de-fanged labor power.

>>17763438
>It kind of sucks to be a German with a Hebrew first name.
You mean like Josef, Maria, Michael, etc.? Even literal Nazis had Hebrew first names lmao, it's a staple of Western European culture since Christianity became dominant

>>17763463
>Yeah, that's kind of the point, nigger
This unironically proves that Americans are anti-Western Civilization. The US is an affront to what Europe has built towards since the days of Plato.

>>17763452
Neoliberals like central bankers because their monetarists while libertarians want free banking/abolish the fed.

>>17763951
>B-but the business people backing socialist policies means against lolberts means that they are lolberts
Don't you know that the soviets were against fully public gay sex? Such a right wing country
>>17764002
What the fuck are you talking about?
>Policies of Lolbert Keynes, the founder of the 1917 club and admirer of Lenin
>Whom admitted that free marketeers are right
>Democratization
Like giving everything you own to a central planner or just a random bureaucrat?
>Private property requires force
No, the theft of private property requires force
A lolbert society would turn into an improved and better version of the HRE to make the followers of Voltaire ack themselves

>>17764027
>Wordplay
Anon meanings of words change, if you propose a new name, please give an example of an adequate name

>>17765270
>Maria
I think its pretty insidious how a name thats literally derived from Mars has become associated forever with Judaism in Europe because of Christianity.
>inb4 Miriam
Maria was present as a Latin name in Rome before Christianity. Its male form Marius should ring bells for someone with even a surface level knowledge of Roman history.

>>17767211
"Propertarian"

>>17765275
Cry about it, nigger. Your countries are shitholes, we are the real white world now

>>17763930
Does it?

>>17767612
Yes, they have taken over turkey too

>>17767612
Stalin was good, yes.

>>17763380
I wouldn’t say that, philosemitism goes all the way back go the Puritians

wasn't that the "free market in children" guy?

>>17763552
That's Friedman's idea - companies only exist for shareholder profits.